Abstract
This study reports on the auditory and visual comprehension of Japanese idioms having both literal and figurative meanings. Experiment I conducted the rating of the semantic distance between the two meanings. Experiment II investigated the difference of comprehension between semantically far and close idioms. Here the materials are presented in isolation both auditorily and visually. Experiment III conducted the same investigation as Experiment II, except that idioms were presented embedded in literally and figuratively induced contexts. Experiment IV reinvestigated the findings obtained from the previous experiments. The results of these experiments show that in isolation visual presentation precedes auditory presentation, and that both in the auditory and visual presentations semantically far idioms are comprehended more accurately than semantically close idioms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broderick, V. (1991). Young children's comprehension of similarities underlying metaphor.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 65–81.
Cacciari, C., & Levorato, M. C. (1989). How children understand idioms in discourse.Journal of Child Language, 16, 387–405.
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms.Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–683.
Chen, H.-C., & Juola, J. F. (1982). Dimension of lexical coding in Chinese and English.Memory & Cognition, 10, 126–224.
Clevenger, T., & Edwards, R. (1988). Semantic distance as a predictor of metaphor selection.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 211–226.
Cronk, B. C., Lima, S. D., & Schweigert, W. A. (1993). Idioms in sentences: Effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity,Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 59–82.
Ezell, H. K., & Goldstein, H. (1991). Comparison of idiom comprehension of normal children and children with mental retardation.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 812–819.
Gibbs, R. W. (1985). On the process of understanding idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 465–472.
Gibbs, R. W. (1987). Linguistic factors in children's understanding of idioms.Journal of Child Language, 14, 569–686.
Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576–593.
Ho, C. S., & Chen, H. (1993). Effects of syntactic structure in the memory of concrete and abstract Chinese sentences,Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 505–518.
Jastrzembski, E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology, 13, 273–305.
Kats, A. N., Paivio, A., & Marschark, M. (1985). Poetic comparison: Psychological dimensions of metaphoric processing,Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 365–383.
Kroll, N. E. A., & Schepeler, E. M. (1987). The comprehension and recall of similes as a function of context and cue.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 101–132.
Marschark, M., & Hunt, R. (1985). On memory for metaphor.Memory & Cognition, 13, 413–424.
Mueller, R. A. G., & Gibbs, R. W. (1987). Processing idioms with multiple meanings,Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 63–81.
Nelson, E. M. M. (1992). Memory for metaphor by nonfluent bilinguals.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 111–125.
Nippold, M. A., Leonard, L. B., & Kail, R. (1984). Syntactic and conceptual factors in children's understanding of metaphors.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 197–205.
Nippold, M. A., & Martin, S. T. (1989). Idiom interpretation in isolation versus context: A developmental study with adolescents.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 59–66.
Pearson, B. Z. (1990). The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children.Journal of Child Language, 17, 185–203.
Pollio, H. R., Fabrizi, M. S., Sills, A., & Smith, M. K. (1984). Need metaphoric comprehension take longer than literal comprehension?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 195–214.
Reagan, R. T. (1987). The syntax of English idioms: Can the dog be put on?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 417–441.
Schraw, G., Trathen, W., Reynolds, R. E., & Lapan, R. T. (1988). Preferences for idioms: Restrictions due to lexicalization and familiarity.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 413–424.
Schweigert, W. A. (1986). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33–45.
Schweigert, W. A., & Moates, D. R. (1988). Familiar idioms' comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 281–296.
Shinjo, M., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of context in metaphor comprehension.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 226–241.
Tompkins, C. A. (1990). Knowledge and strategies for processing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33. 307–316.
Williams-Whitney, D., Mio, J. S., & Whitney, P. (1992). Metaphor production in creative writing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 497–509.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miura, I. Comprehension of idiomatic expressions in Japanese—Auditory and visual presentations. J Psycholinguist Res 25, 659–676 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712415
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712415