Abstract
Between January 1988 and May 1989 twenty cases of bacteremia due toFlavobacterium sp. occurred in 17 patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit. Epidemiologic studies disclosed that the source of theFlavobacterium bacteremias was contaminated reusable pressure transducers. Despite the use of disposable domes spread of the bacteria from the contaminated transducer heads to the fluids given to the patients occurred. An indirect contamination by hands at the time the equipment was initially assembled must have been the mode of transmission. Reinstitution of routine disinfection of the transducer heads controlled the outbreak. Disposable domes failed to prevent septicemia from contaminated pressure transducers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stamm WE, Colella JJ, Anderson RL, Dixon RE (1975) Indwelling arterial catheters as a source of nosocomial bacteremia. An outbreak caused byFlavobacterium species. N Engl J Med 292:1099–1102
Weinstein RA, Stamm WE, Kramer L, Corey L (1976) Pressure monitoring devices. Overlooked source of nosocomial infection. JAMA 236:936–938
Buxton AE, Anderson RL, Klimek J, Quintiliani R (1978) Failure of disponsable domes to prevent septicemia acquired from contaminated pressure transducers. Chest 74:508–513
Donowitz LG, Marsif FJ, Hoyt JW, Wenzel RP (1979) Serratia marcescens bacteremia from contaminated pressure transducers. JAMA 242:1749–1751
Henning RJ, McClish D, Daly B, Nearman H, Franklin C, Jackson D (1987) Clinical characteristics and resource utilization of ICU patients: implications for organization of intensive care. Crit Care Med 15:264–269
Beck-Sague CM, Jarvis WR (1989) Epidemic bloodstream infections associated with pressure transducers: a persistent problem. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 10:54–59
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hekker, T.A.M., van Overhagen, W. & Schneider, A.J. Pressure transducers: An overlooked source of sepsis in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 16, 511–512 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709402
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709402