Skip to main content
Log in

Polymerase chain reaction versus culture for detection ofUreaplasma urealyticum andMycoplasma hominis in the urogenital tract of adults and the respiratory tract of newborns

  • Notes
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was compared with that of culture for detection ofUreaplasma urealyticum andMycoplasma hominis in 726 clinical specimens comprising 189 gynecological samples, 362 urological samples, and 175 samples from newborn infants. The sensitivity of PCR versus culture was 95% for both organisms, while the sensitivity of culture versus PCR was 91% forUreaplasma urealyticum and 84% forMycoplasma hominis. Furthermore, PCR tests were faster than culture tests, allowing the time to diagnosis to be reduced from two to five days to 24 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cassell GH, Waites KB, Taylor-Robinson D: Genital mycoplasmas. In: Morse SA, Moreland AA, Thompson SE (ed): Atlas of sexually transmitted diseases. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1990. p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomsen AC: Mycoplasmas in human pyelonephritis: demonstration of antibodies in serum and urine. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1978, 8: 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mardh PA, Weström L: Tubal and cervical cultures in acute salpingitis with special reference toMycoplasma hominis and T-strain mycoplasmas. British Journal of Venereal Diseases 1970, 46: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edelin KC, McCormack WM: Infection withMycoplasma hominis in postpartum fever. Lancet 1980, ii: 1217–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown MB, Cassell GH, Taylor-Robinson D, Shepard MC: Measurement of antibody toUreaplasma urealyticum by an enzyme-linked assay and detection of antibody responses in patients with nongonococcal urethritis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 17: 288–295.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brunner H, Weidner W, Schiefer HG: Quantitative studies on the role ofUreaplasma urealyticum in non-gonococcal urethritis and chronic prostatitis. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1983, 56: 545–550.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Courfalik ED, Taylor-Robinson D, Csonka GW: Treatment of nongonococcal urethritis with rifampicin as a means of defining the role ofUreaplasma urealyticum. British Journal of Venereal Diseases 1979, 55: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cassell GH, Waites KB, Watson HL, Crouse DT, Harasawa R:Ureaplasma urealyticum intrauterine infection: role in prematurity and disease in newborns. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1993, 6: 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cassell GH, Waites KB, Gibbs RS, Davis JK: Role ofUreaplasma urealyticum in amnionitis. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1986, 5, Supplement: 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sanchez PJ, Regan JA: Vertical transmission ofUreaplasma urealyticum in full term infants. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1987, 6: 825–828.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waites KB, Crouse DT, Phillips JB, Canupp KC, Cassell GH: Ureaplasma pneumonia and sepsis associated with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Pediatrics 1989, 83: 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang EL, Frayha H, Watts J, Hammerberg O, Mahony JB, Cassell GH: Role ofUreaplasma urealyticum and other pathogens in the development of chronic lung disease of prematurity. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1988, 7: 547–551.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie: Isolierung und Identifizierung von Mycoplasmen und Chlamydien. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Hygiene 1989 A, 270: 470–486.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blanchard A, Hentschel J, Duffy L, Baldus K: Detection ofUreaplasma urealyticum by polymerase chain reaction in the urogenital tract of adults, in amniotic fluid, and in the respiratory tract of newborns. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1993, 17, Supplement: 148–153.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Teng K, Li M, Yu W, Li H, Shen D, Liu D: Comparison of PCR with culture for detection ofUreaplasma urealyticum in clinical samples from patients with urogenital infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1994, 32: 2232–2234.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waites KB, Crouse DT, Cassell GH: Antibiotic susceptibilities and therapeutic options forUreaplasma urealyticum infection in neonates. Pediatric infectious Disease Journal 1992, 11: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abele-Horn, M., Wolff, C., Dressel, P. et al. Polymerase chain reaction versus culture for detection ofUreaplasma urealyticum andMycoplasma hominis in the urogenital tract of adults and the respiratory tract of newborns. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 595–598 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709369

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709369

Keywords

Navigation