Skip to main content
Log in

False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detectChlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the presence of inhibitors in urine specimens causing false-negative results in a commercialChlamydia trachomatis gap-filling ligase chain reaction (Gap-LCR) assay. On testing of urine samples by the Gap-LCR assay and urethral swab specimens by cell culture, 73 (19%)Chlamydia trachomatis positive subjects were detected among 382 men attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. In 56 subjects, the agent was detected in both the urine and the urethral samples, while 309 subjects were negative in both tests. In seven subjects urine samples were Gap-LCR positive (confirmed by a different Gap-LCR assay), but the corresponding urethral swab samples were cell culture-negative. In another ten subjects the urethral swab samples were cell culture positive, but their urine samples were Gap-LCR negative. Subsequent re-analysis of the urine samples including the addition of externalChlamydia trachomatis DNA indicated full or partial inhibition in nine of the cell culture-positive Gap-LCR negative subjects. When urine preparations were freeze-thawed and diluted prior to testing,Chlamydia trachomatis was detected in six of the ten initially Gap-LCR-negative samples. Gap-LCR inhibitors were present in at least nine (12%) of the 73 urine preparations from theChlamydia trachomatis positive individuals. Identification of samples containing Gap-LCR inhibitors and subsequent processing to reduce the inhibition increased the sensitivity of the test from 86% to 95%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loeffelholz MJ, Lewinski CA, Silver SR, Purohit AP, Herman SA, Buonagurio DA, Dragon EA: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 2847–2851.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW, Jang D, Chernesky MA: Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing forChlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 2241–2245.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dutilh B, Bébéar C, Rodriguez P, Vekris A, Bonnet J, Garret M: Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to allChlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction. Research in Microbiology 1989, 140:7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. An Q, Radcliffe G, Vassallo R, Buxton D, O'Brien WJ, Pelletier DA, Weisburg WG, Klinger JD, Olive DM: Infection with a plasmid-free variantChlamydia related toChlamydia trachomatis identified by using multiple assays for nucleic acid detection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 2814–2821.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dille BJ, Butzen CC, Birkenmeyer LG: Amplification ofChlamydia trachomatis DNA by ligase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 729–731.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ripa KT, Mårdh PA: Cultivation ofChlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1977, 6: 328–331.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chernesky MA, Jang D, Lee H, Burczak JD, Hu H, Sellors J, Tomazic-Allen SJ, Mahony JB: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1994, 32: 2682–2685.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ånestad G, Berdal BP, Scheel O, Mundal R, Odinsen O, Skaug K, Khalil OS, Plier P, Lee H: Screening urine samples by leukocyte esterase test and ligase chain reaction forChlamydial infections among asymptomatic men. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 2483–2484.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee HH, Chernesky MA, Schachter J, Burczak JD, Andrews WW, Muldoon S, Leckie G, Stamm WE: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet 1995, 345:213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bassiri M, Hu HY, Domeika MA, Burczak J, Svensson L-O, Lee HH, Mårdh PA: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 898–900.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pasternack R, Vuorinen P, Pitkäjärvi T, Koskela M, Miettinen A: Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1997, 35:402–405.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van-Doornum GJJ, Buimer M, Prins M, Henquet CJM, Coutinho RA, Plier PK, Tomazic-Allen S, Hu H, Lee H: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 2042–2047.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grimprel E, Sanchez PJ, Wendel GD, Burstain JM, McCracken GH, Radolf JD, Norgard MV: Use of polymerase chain reaction and rabbit infectivity testing to detectTreponema pallidum in amniotic fluid, fetal and neonatal sera, and cerebrospinal fluid. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 1711–1718.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wiedbrauk DL, Werner JC, Drevon AM: Inhibition of PCR by aqueous and vitreous fluids. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 2643–2646.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson EM, Markoff BA, Schachter J, de la Maza LM: The 7.5-kb plasmid present inChlamydia trachomatis is not essential for the growth of this microorganism. Plasmid 1990, 23: 144–148.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van-Vollenhoven P, Heyns CF, de-Beer PM, Whitaker P, van-Helden PD, Victor T: Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of urinary tract tuberculosis. Urological Research 1996, 24: 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, E.S., Ånestad, G., Moi, H. et al. False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detectChlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16, 727–731 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709252

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709252

Keywords

Navigation