Abstract
This paper examines the syntactic processing of structural ambiguities in German verbsecond (V2) clauses. It is argued that the proposal of Grimshaw (1991, 1993) that CP and IP are verbal “extended projections” allows an incremental parse of these ambiguities which is consistent with the principles of simplicity(no vacuous structure building) and structural determinism(computed dominance and precedence relations cannot be altered by parser-internal operations) proposed in Gorrell (1995). It is argued that the ambiguities discussed here provide evidence against the hypothesis that the parser's initial attachment decisions follow from a maximal-licensing principle rather than a preference for minimal structure (Pritchett, 1992). Further, it is argued that, contra Fodor and Inoue (1994), theories of syntactic processing must not only incorporate some mechanism for resolving conflicts between new input and computed structure, but also distinguish the comparative costs of different reanalysis types.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barton, E., & Berwick, R. (1985). Parsing with assertion sets and information monotonicity.Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 769–771).
Berwick, R., & Weinberg, A. (1985). Deterministic parsing and linguistic explanation.Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 109–134.
Chomsky, N. (1986).Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In R. Freidin (Ed.),Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 417–454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corver, N., & van Reimsdijk, H. (Eds.). (1994).Studies on scrambling: Movement and nonmovement approaches to free word-order phenomena. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
De Vincenzi, M. (1991).Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fodor, J. D., & Frazier, L. (1980). Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN?Cognition, 8, 417–459.
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994). The diagnosis and cure of garden paths.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 407–434.
Frazier, L. (1978).On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut. (Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.)
Frazier, L., & Flores d'Arcais, G. (1989). Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.Cognition, 6, 291–325.
Gorrell, P. (1992).The parser as tree builder. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.
Gorrell, P. (1995).Syntax and parsing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Gorrell, P. (1996a).The syntactic processing of German verb-fixed clauses. Unpublished ms., Max Plank Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig.
Gorrell, P. (1996b).Diagnosis and determinism. The syntactic processing of German verb-fixed clauses. Unpublished ms., Max Plank Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig.
Grimshaw, J. (1991).Extended projections. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.
Grimshaw, J. (1993).Minimal projection, heads, and optimality (Tech. Rep. 4). Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to Government & Binding Theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Hemforth, B. (1993).Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentation und Verarbeitung sprachlichen Wissens. Sankt Augustin, Germany: Infix Verlag.
Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.),Japanese sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marcus, M. (1980).A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marcus, M., Hindle, D., & Fleck, M. (1983). D-theory: Talking about talking about trees.Association for Computational Linguistics, 21, 129–136.
Pritchett, B. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251–270.
Pritchett, B. (1992).Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Speas, M. (1990).Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Thiersch, C. (1978).Topics in German syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Travis, L. (1984).Parameters and effects of word-order variation Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Travis, L. (1991). Parameters of phrase structure and verb-second phenomena. In R. Freidin (Ed.),Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 339–364). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weinberg, A. (1993). Parameters in the theory of sentence processing: Minimal commitment theory goes east.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 339–364.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This is a condensed version of Gorrell (1996a). In this paper I discuss only a few of the relevant structures in German. The longer paper examines the processing ofwh-strucrures and verb-final clauses in German, omitted here. For a more detailed discussion of the properties of the parsing model outlined here, see Gorrell (1995).
Many thanks are due to Gisbert Fanselow, Peter Staudacher, Matthias Schlesewsky, and Craig Thiersch for helpful comments and criticisms. This paper was written while I was a member of the University of Potsdam Linguistics Department and I want to thank Ria De Bleser, Jürgen Weissenborn, and the students in my seminars on parsing theory for helping to make Potsdam a good place to work. Jutta Kasprzik deserves special thanks for favors too numerous to list. I also want to thank audiences at the University of Jena and the workshop on sentence processing at the Einstein Forum, Potsdam.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gorrell, P. Parsing theory and phrase-order variation in German V2 clauses. J Psycholinguist Res 25, 135–156 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708423
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708423