Mathematical systems theory

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 191–194 | Cite as

A helpful result for proving inherent ambiguity

  • William Ogden
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Y. Bar-Hillel, M. Perles andE. Shamir, On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars.Z. Phonetik Sprachwiss. Kommunikat. 14 (1961), 143–172.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. Chomsky, Formal properties of grammars.Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2 (edited by R. D. Luce, R. Bush, and E. Galanter), John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Ginsburg,The Mathematical Theory of Context-Free Languages. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Ginsburg andJ. S. Ullian, Ambiguity in context-free languages.J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 13 (1966), 62–89.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. J. Parikh, Language generating devices.MIT Res. Lab. Electron. Quart. Prog. Rep. 60 (1961), 199–212.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Ogden
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations