Skip to main content
Log in

On relativizations with restricted number of accesses to the oracle set

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conflicting relativizations, also known as “Baker-Gill-Solovay phenomena,” are common place in complexity theory. However, Book, Long, and Selman (SIAM J. Comput.,13 (1984), 461–487) have shown thatP(A) = NP B (A) for all oraclesA if and only ifP = NP, whereNP B (A) denotes the class of languages accepted by nondeterministic machines which possess only a polynomial number of query strings in the computation tree. It is shown in this paper that any superpolynomial bound on the number of queries already yields the BGS phenomenon. Similar results hold for theNP = co-NP andNPC = NP questions. A second objective of this paper is to point out a technique of Hartmanis with which to achieve oracle constructions by using the Kolmogorov complexity. This relatively new technique seems to be adequate for obtaining separation results for complexity classes which are not enumerable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Baker, J. Gill, and R. Solovary, Relativizations of theP = ? NP question,SIAM J. Comput.,4 (1975), 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Book, T. Long, and A. Selman, Quantitative relativization of complexity classes,SIAM J. Comput.,13 (1984), 461–487.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Book, T. Long, and A. Selman, Qualitative relativization of complexity classes,J. Comput. System. Sci.,30 (1985), 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Book, P. Orponen, D. Russo, and O. Watanabe, Lowness properties of sets in the exponentialtime hierarchy,Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Calude and I. Chitescu, Random strings according to A. N. Kolmogorov and P. Martin-Löf. Classical approach.Found. Control Engrg.,7 (1982), 73–85,

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Goldberg and M. Sipser, Compression and ranking,Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1985, pp. 440–448.

  7. J. Hartmanis, Generalized Kolmogorov complexity and the structure of feasible computations,Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, 1983, pp. 439–445.

  8. J. Hartmanis and L. Hemachandra, Complexity classes without machines. On complete languages for UP,Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986, pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman,Introduction to Automata. Theory, Languages and Computation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. N. Kolmogorov, Three approaches to the definition of the concept quantity of information,Peredachi Inform.,1 (1964), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Selman, Xu Mei-Ru, and R. Book, Positive relativizations of complexity classes,SIAM J. Comput.,13 (1983), 565–579.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Valiant, Relative complexity of checking and evaluating,Inform. Process. Lett.,5 (1976), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Zimand, On the existence of complete sets for positive relativized classes (manuscript).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimand, M. On relativizations with restricted number of accesses to the oracle set. Math. Systems Theory 20, 1–11 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01692055

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01692055

Keywords

Navigation