Abstract
Conflicting relativizations, also known as “Baker-Gill-Solovay phenomena,” are common place in complexity theory. However, Book, Long, and Selman (SIAM J. Comput.,13 (1984), 461–487) have shown thatP(A) = NP B (A) for all oraclesA if and only ifP = NP, whereNP B (A) denotes the class of languages accepted by nondeterministic machines which possess only a polynomial number of query strings in the computation tree. It is shown in this paper that any superpolynomial bound on the number of queries already yields the BGS phenomenon. Similar results hold for theNP = co-NP andNPC = NP questions. A second objective of this paper is to point out a technique of Hartmanis with which to achieve oracle constructions by using the Kolmogorov complexity. This relatively new technique seems to be adequate for obtaining separation results for complexity classes which are not enumerable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Baker, J. Gill, and R. Solovary, Relativizations of theP = ? NP question,SIAM J. Comput.,4 (1975), 431–442.
R. Book, T. Long, and A. Selman, Quantitative relativization of complexity classes,SIAM J. Comput.,13 (1984), 461–487.
R. Book, T. Long, and A. Selman, Qualitative relativization of complexity classes,J. Comput. System. Sci.,30 (1985), 395–413.
R. Book, P. Orponen, D. Russo, and O. Watanabe, Lowness properties of sets in the exponentialtime hierarchy,Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986.
C. Calude and I. Chitescu, Random strings according to A. N. Kolmogorov and P. Martin-Löf. Classical approach.Found. Control Engrg.,7 (1982), 73–85,
A. Goldberg and M. Sipser, Compression and ranking,Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1985, pp. 440–448.
J. Hartmanis, Generalized Kolmogorov complexity and the structure of feasible computations,Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, 1983, pp. 439–445.
J. Hartmanis and L. Hemachandra, Complexity classes without machines. On complete languages for UP,Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986, pp. 123–135.
J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman,Introduction to Automata. Theory, Languages and Computation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1979.
A. N. Kolmogorov, Three approaches to the definition of the concept quantity of information,Peredachi Inform.,1 (1964), 3–17.
A. Selman, Xu Mei-Ru, and R. Book, Positive relativizations of complexity classes,SIAM J. Comput.,13 (1983), 565–579.
L. Valiant, Relative complexity of checking and evaluating,Inform. Process. Lett.,5 (1976), 20–23.
M. Zimand, On the existence of complete sets for positive relativized classes (manuscript).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimand, M. On relativizations with restricted number of accesses to the oracle set. Math. Systems Theory 20, 1–11 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01692055
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01692055