Skip to main content
Log in

Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urethral and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients by the polymerase chain reaction

  • Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay Amplicor (Roche Molecular Systems, USA) for diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infection, urethral and urine swabs from a total of 344 male patients were tested and the results compared with those obtained by the nonisotopic hybridization assay Pace 2 (Gen Probe, USA) for urethral samples and by the enzyme immunoassay EIA MicroTrak (Syva, USA) for urine. Discrepant results were analyzed by a repeated test run using a major outer membrane protein-derived primer PCR, by the probe competition assay, and by the direct immunofluorescence test (DIF). Thirty-nine men (11.3%) were chlamydia positive, based on the results of all tests from both sampling sites. The rate of detection of chlamydia in urethral specimens by Amplicor and the Pace 2 was 79.5% and 61.5%, respectively, while the rate of detection in urine sediment was 75% for both Amplicor and EIA. In the first run of the PCR, a high number of false-negative results for unfrozen samples was observed, decreasing the sensitivity of Amplicor in urine to 47.3%. The results of the study indicate that Amplicor detects more infected individuals compared with other tests and is suitable as an alternative diagnostic test for chlamydia infections, using not only urethral specimens but also urine specimens. However, the finding of false-negative results when using Amplicor on unfrozen samples must be further investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chernesky M, Castriciano S, Sellors J, Stewart I, Cunningham I, Landis S, Seidelman W, Grant L, Devlin C, Mahony J: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1990, 161: 124–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chernesky MA, Mahony JB, Castriciano S, More M, Stewart I, Landis S, Seidelman W, Sargeant E, Leman C: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1986, 154: 141–148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moncada J, Schachter J, Bolan G, Engelman J, Howard L, Mushawar I, Ridgway G, Mumtaz G, Stamm W, Clark A: Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the Chlamydiazyme test forChlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1770–1773.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor-Robinson D: The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job. European Journal of Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 499–503.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stary A, Heller-Vitouch C, Müller I: Rapid diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis in male patients by antigen detection in urine samples. Dermatology 1992, 185: 27–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gene M, Stary A, Bergman S, Mardh P-A: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine collected from men and women attending a venereal clinic. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica 1991, 99: 455–459.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stary A, Steyrer K, Heller-Vitouch C, Müller I, Mardh P-A: Screening forChlamydia trachomatis in military personnel by urine testing. Infection 1991, 19: 205–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kok T-W, Payne LE, Bailey SE, Waddell RG: Urine and the laboratory diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis in males. Genitourinary Medicine 1993, 69: 51–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaschek G, Gaydos CA, Welsh LE, Quinn TC: Direct detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 5: 1209–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor-Robinson D, Thomas BJ: Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Genitourinary Medicine 1991, 67: 256–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tarn MR, Stamm WE, Handsfield HH, Stephens R, Kuo CC, Holmes KK, Ditzenberger K, Krieger M, Nowinski RC: Culture-independent diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies. New England Journal of Medicine 1984, 310: 1146–1150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ridgway GL, Taylor-Robinson D: Current problems in microbiology. 1. Chlamydial infections: which laboratory test? Journal of Clinical Pathology 1991, 44: 1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mardh P-A, Paavonen J, Puolakkainen M: Chlamydia. Plenum Publishing, New York, 1989, p. 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stary A, Kopp W, Gebhart W, Söltz-Szöts J: Culture versus direct specimen test: comparative study of infections withChlamydia trachomatis in Viennese prostitutes. Genitourinary Medicine 1985, 61: 258–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. LeBar W, Heschman B, Jemal C, Pierzchala J: Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1989, 27: 826–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Woods GL, Young A, Scott JC, Blair TMH, Johnson AM: Evaluation of a nonisotopic probe for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 370–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mercer LJ, Robinson DC, Sahm DF, Lawrie MJ, Hajj SN: Comparison of chemiluminescent DNA probe to cell culture for the screening ofChlamydia trachomatis in a gynecology clinic population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990, 76: 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kluytmans JA, Niesters HG, Mouton JW, Quint WG, Ijpelaar JA, Van Rijsoort-Vos JH, Habbema L, Stolz E, Michel MF, Wagenvoort JH: Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 2685–2689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iwen PC, Blair TMH, Woods GL: Comparison of the GenProbe PACE 2 system, direct fluorescent antibody, and cell culture for detectingChlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1991, 95: 578–582.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Limberger RJ, Biega R, Evancoe A, McMarthy L, Sliviensky L, Kirkwood M: Evaluation of culture and the GenProbe PACE 2 assay for detection ofNeisseria gonorrhoeae andChlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens transported to a state health laboratory. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 1162–1166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stary A, Kopp W, Zahel B, Müller I, Nerad S, Storch M: Rapid diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis with a nucleic acid probe in male and female patients. Dermatology 1994, 188: 300–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stary A, Teodorowicz L, Hörting-Müller I, Nerad S, Storch M: Evaluation of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 and the MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 1994, 21: 26–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lees Ml, Newman DM, Garland SM: Comparison of a DNA probe assay with culture for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1991, 35: 159–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang LI, Panke ES, Leist PA, Fry RJ, Lee RF: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis endocervical infection in asymptomatic and symptomatic women: comparison of deoxyribonucleic acid probe test with tissue culture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991, 165: 1444–1453.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Blanding J, Hirsch L, Stranton N, Wright T, Aarnaes S, de la Maza LM, Peterson EM: Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia, the PACE 2 assay, and culture for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis from cervical specimens in a low-prevalence population. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 312: 1622–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ostergaard L, Birkelund S, Christiansen G: Use of polymerase chain reaction for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1254–1260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW, Jang D, Chernesky MA: Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing forChlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 9: 2241–2245.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW, Chernesky MA: Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detectingChlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 7: 1753–1758.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bobo L, Coutlee F, Yolken R, Quinn T, Viscidi RP: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1968–1973.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Näher H, Drzonek H, Wolf J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Petzold D: Detection ofC. trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction. Genitourinary Medicine 1991, 67: 211–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ossewaarde JM, Rieffe M, Rozenberg-Arska M, Ossenkoppele PM, Nawrocki RP, van Loon AM: Development and clinical evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction test for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 2122–2128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Viscidi RP, Bobo L, Hook EW, Quinn TC: Transmission ofChlamydia trachomatis among sex partners assessed by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1993, 168: 488–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eley A, Oxley KM, Spencer RC, Kinghorn GR, Ben-Ahmeida ET, Potter CW: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in young patients with acute epididymitis. European Journal of Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 620–623.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wu C-H, Lee M-F, Yin S-C, Yang D-M, Cheng SF: Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1992, 19: 193–197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bauwens E, Clark AM, Loeffelholz MJ, Herman SA, Stamm WE: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of firstcatch urine. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 3013–3016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goessens WHF, Kluytmans JA, denToom N, van Rijsoort-Vos TH, Niesters BGM, Stolz E, Verbrugh HA, Quint WGV: Influence of volume of sample processed on detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples by PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 251–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stary, A., Choueiri, B., Hörting-Müller, I. et al. Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urethral and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients by the polymerase chain reaction. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 465–471 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691313

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691313

Keywords

Navigation