Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multicenter evaluation of a new commercial assay for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies toToxoplasma gondii

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new commercial assay for detection of IgM-specific antibodies toToxoplasma gondii (IMx Toxo IgM, Abbott, USA), based on microparticle enzyme immunoassay technology, was evaluated at 15 clinical sites in Europe and the USA. Performance characteristics were established by testing clinical specimens collected randomly from pregnant women, blood donors, individuals with suspectedToxoplasma gondii infection and individuals confirmed HIV positive. Reference testing was performed using Toxo-M EIA (Abbott). Specimens evaluated at European sites yielding discordant results between the new assay and the reference EIA were further tested with an immunosorbent agglutination assay; at sites in the USA, discordant results were resolved using Platelia Toxo IgM (Sanofi, France) and Vidas Toxo IgM (bioMérieux, France) assays. In addition, matched plasma and serum, heat-treated and non-heat-treated specimens, and fresh and frozen specimens were evaluated at the USA sites. At European sites the new commercial assay had a sensitivity of 95.6 % (196/205), a specificity of 99.8 % (3,137/3,143) and an agreement of 99.6 % (3,333/3,348) following resolution of discordant results; sensitivity in the USA was 97.4 % (184/189), specificity was 99.8 % (1,204/1,207) and agreement was 99.4 % (1,388/1,396) following resolution. The new IMx Toxo IgM is a sensitive and specific assay for measurement of IgM antibodies toToxoplasma gondii in human serum and plasma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Naot Y, Remington JS: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of IgM antibodies toToxoplasma gondir. use for diagnosis of acute acquired toxoplasmosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1980, 142: 757–766.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schaefer LE, Dyke JW, Meglio FD, Murray PR, Crafts W, Niles A: Evaluation of microparticle enzyme immunoassays for immunoglobulins G and M to rubella virus andToxoplasma gondii on the Abbott IMx automated analyzer. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1989, 27: 2410–2413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luyasu V, Schroeder G, Wacquez M, Bohy E: Screening of pregnant women for antibodies against toxoplasma and CMV with the IMx analyzer in Belgium. Klinisches Labor 1993, 39: 799–802.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bessières MH, Roques C, Berrebi A, Barre V, Cazaux M, Seguela JP: IgA antibody response during acquired and congenital toxoplasmosis. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1992, 45: 605–608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCabe RE, Remington JS: The diagnosis and treatment of toxoplasmosis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 2: 95–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Bono V, Canessa A, Bruzzi P, Fioreli MA, Terragna A: Significance of specific immunoglobulin M in the chronological diagnosis of 38 cases of toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1989, 27, Supplement 9: 2133–2135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gussetti N, D'Elia R: Natural immunoglobulin M antibodies againstToxoplasma gondii during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990, 162, Supplement 5: 1359–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desmonts G, Daffos F, Forestier F, Capella-Paviovsky M, Thulliez P, Chartier M: Prenatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Lancet 1985, i: 500–504.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pinon JM, Poirriez Y, Leroux B, Dupouy D, Quereux C, Garin JP: Diagnostic précoce et surveillance de la toxoplasmose congénitale. Méthodes des profils immunologiques comparés. Presse Médicale 1987, 10, Supplement 16: 471–474.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stepick-Biek P, Thulliez P, Araujo FG, Remington JS: IgA antibodies for diagnosis of acute congenital and acquired toxoplasmosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1990, 162: 270–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gretch DR, Warren JJ, Bacina RM, Stefansson ED, Fritsche TR: Performance characteristics of a commercial antibody-capture enzyme immunoassay for detection of toxoplasma-specific IgM antibodies. Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease 1992, 15: 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson AM, Roberts H, Tenter AM: Evaluation of a recombinant antigen ELISA for the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis and comparison with traditional ELISAs. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1992, 37: 404–409.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fleiss JL: The design and analysis of clinical experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986, p. 432.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paris-Hamelin A, Fustec-lbaboure S: Détection des IgG et IgM toxoplasmiques par méthodes ELISA sur billes. Feuillets de Biologie 1986, Volume XXVII: 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Candolfi R, Bessières MH, Marty P, Cimon B, Gandilhon F, Pelloux H, Thulliez P: Determination of a new cut-off value for the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis by detection of aspecific IgM in an enzyme immunoassay. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1993, 12: 396–397.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Best JM, Palmer SJ, Morgan-Capner P, Hodgson J: A comparison of Rubazyme-M and MACRIA for detection of rubella-specific IgM. Journal of Virological Methods 1994, 8: 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Braun R, Doerr HW, Geisen HP, Hornig C, Huschka U, Munk K: Comparison of different methods for the detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies. Journal of Medical Virology 1981, 8: 207–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chantler S, Evans CJ: Selection and performance of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies in an IgM antibody capture enzyme immunoassay for rubella. Journal of Immunological Methods 1986, 87: 109–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Echevarria JM, deOry F, Najera R: Fluorimmunoassay for detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin M: comparison with indirect enzyme immunoassay and muchain capture. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 428–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mortimer PP, Tedder RS, Hambling MH, Shafi MS, Burkhardt F, Schilt U: Antibody capture radioimmunoassay for anti-rubella IgM. Journal of Hygiene 1981, 86: 139–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

M.C. Chretien, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Rungis, France; A. Vockel, Abbott GmbH, Delkenheim, Germany; M.H. Bessieres, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, Toulouse, France; B. Cimon, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Angers, Angers, France; J. Dyke, Sparrow Hospital, Lansing, Michigan, USA; B. England and M. Canavaggio, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA; R. Gipson, St. Joseph Hospital & Health Care Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA; A. Goullier, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Grenoble, France; K. Janitschke, Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany; O. Morin, Institut de Biologie, Nantes, France; F. Parri, Ospedale Careggi, Firenze, Italy; L. Perrin, Hôpital Cantonnal Universitaire, Geneva, Switzerland; I. Reiter-Owona and H.M. Seitz, Institut für Medizinische Parasitologie, Bonn, Germany; W. Smilovici, Centre de Transfusion, Toulouse, France; P. Thulliez, Institut de Puériculture, Paris, France; J. Zufferey, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luyasu, V., Robert, A.R., Schaefer, L. et al. Multicenter evaluation of a new commercial assay for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies toToxoplasma gondii . Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14, 787–793 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690994

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690994

Keywords

Navigation