Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of six culture media for isolation ofSalmonella species from stool samples

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative performance of five plating media [Rambach agar; salmonella-shigella (SS) agar, novobiocin-brilliant green-glycerol-lactose (NBGL), modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (MSRV), andSalmonella Detection and Identification-2 (SM2)] and selenite broth (SB) subcultured in SS agar in the recovery ofSalmonella spp. from 500 human stool specimens was evaluated. On Rambach agar and SS agar, the C8-esterase test was also used for selection of suspicious colonies. Eighty-one samples were positive for salmonellae on at least one of the six media. Sensitivities and specificities of MSRV, SB, NBGL, SS, Rambach agar, and SM2 were 95.1 and 98.1%, 87.6 and 99.8%, 79 and 91.9%, 69.1 and 99.3%, 56.8 and 96.9%, and 54.3 and 92.4%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between MSRV and NBGL, Rambach agar, SS agar, and SM2 (p < 0.005), between SB and SS agar, Rambach agar, and SM2 (p < 0.05), and between NBGL and SM2 and Rambach agar (p < 0.005). The greatest number of isolates was recovered with MSRV, whose performance surpassed that of enrichment in selenite broth, probably because the subcultures were not repeated on MSRV. This hypothesis is now under investigation. The specificity of each of the five solid media was greater than 90%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodrigue DC, Tauxe RV, Rowe B: International increase inSalmonella enteritidis: a new pandemic? Epidemiology and Infection 1990, 105: 21–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Devenish JA, Ciebin BW, Brodsky MH: Novobiocin-brilliant green-glucose agar: new medium of isolation of salmonellae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1986, 52: 539–545.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rambach A: New plate medium for facilitated differentiation ofSalmonella spp. fromProteus spp. and other enteric bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1990, 56:301–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeSmedt JM, Bolderdijk R: Dynamics of salmonella isolation with modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium. Journal of Food Protection 1987, 50: 658–661.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dusch H, Altwegg M: Evaluation of five new plating media for isolation ofSalmonella species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 802–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Poisson DM: Novobiocin, brilliant green, glycerol, lactose agar: a new medium for the isolation ofSalmonella strains. Research in Microbiology 1992, 143: 211–216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Monnery I, Freydiere AM, Baron C, Rousset AM, Tigaud S, Boude-Chevalier M, de Montclos H, Gille Y: Evaluation of two new chromogenic media for detection ofSalmonella in stools. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1994, 13: 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruiz J, Núñez ML, Díaz J, Lorente I, Pérez J, Gómez J: Comparison of five plating media for isolation ofSalmonella species from human stools. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1996, 34: 686–688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruiz J, Núñez ML, Climent C, Sempere MA, Gómez J: Utilización del agar Rambach para la detección deSalmonella en heces a partir de un caldo de enriquecimiento. Comparación con nuestra metodología. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica 1995, 13: 213–217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruiz J, Sempere MA, Varela MC, Gómez J: Modification of the methodology of stool culture forSalmonella detection, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 525–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freydiere AM, Gille Y: Detection of salmonellae by using Rambach agar and by a C8-esterase spot test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 2357–2359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y: More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Statistics in Medicine 1990, 9:811–818.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hine EAS, Steffen EK, Wagner JE: New semisolid agar for the detection of motile salmonellae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 875–878.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goossens H, Wauters G, DeBoeck M, Janssens M, Butzler JP: Semisolid selective-motility enrichment medium for isolation of salmonellae from faecal specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 19: 940–941.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aspinall ST, Hindle MA, Hutchinson DN: Improved isolation of salmonellae from faeces using a semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 936–939.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dusch H, Altwegg M: Comparison of Rambach agar, SMID medium, and Hektoen enteric agar for primary isolation of non-typhi salmonellae from stool samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 1: 410–412.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heinzmann WR: Evaluation of Rambach agar for rapid detection ofSalmonella in human feces. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1993,12:306–307.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manafi M, Willinger B: Comparison of three rapid methods for identification ofSalmonella spp. Letters in Applied Microbiology 1994, 19: 328–331.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly MT, Brenner DJ, Farmer JJ:Enterobacteriaceae. In: Lennette EH, Balows A, Hausler WJ, Shadomy HJ (ed): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, 1990, p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz, J., Núñez, M.L., Lorente, I. et al. Performance of six culture media for isolation ofSalmonella species from stool samples. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 922–926 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690509

Keywords

Navigation