Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro evidence that interactions betweenXenopus blastomeres restrict cell migration

  • Published:
Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The consistency of the frog blastula's fate map is produced, in part, because the progeny of blastomeres located in dfferent regions do not intermix with one another. We examined the cause for this restriction of intermixing in two types of cultures. In one type of culture, two groups of cells were excised from blastulae and stuck together; the movement of cells between the groups was monitored. Cells migrated more extensively between groups derived from the same region than between groups derived from different regions. In the other type of culture, a single cell was implanted into a group of cells that was excised from the blastula. The rate of division and the extent of migration of the implanted cell's clone were monitored. The implanted cell divided more rapidly among cells from its own region than among cells from a different region. Both experiments show that the restriction of intermixing that occurs between regions of the intact embryo also occurs in vitro. These results indicate that the restriction does not result secondarily from normal morphogenetic movements, which are absent from the explants, but probably from cellular interactions that limit the extent of cell migration. This limitation is correlated with a reduction in the rate of cell division.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie M (1946) Estimation of nuclcar populations from microtome sections. Anat Rec 94:239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Boterenbrood EC, Narraway JM, Hara K (1983) Duration of cleavage cycles and asymmetry in the direction of cleavage waves prior to gastrulation inXenopus laevis. Roux' Arch Dev Biol 192:216–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardellini P (1988) Reversal of the dorsoventral polarity inXenopus laevis embryos by 180° rotation of the animal micromeres at the eight-cell stage. Dev Biol 128:428–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dale L, Slack JMW (1987) Fate map for the 32-cell stage ofXenopus laevis. Development 99:527–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M (1955) Dissociation and reaggregation of embryonic cells ofTriturus alpestris. J Embryol Exp Morphol 3:251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon JB (1989) The localization of an inductive response. Development 105:27–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon JB, Fairman S, Mohun TJ, Brennan S (1985) The activation of muscle-specific genes inXenopus development by an induction between animal and vegetal cells of a blastula. Cell 41:913–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose G, Jacobson M (1979) Clonal organization of the central nervous system of the frog. I. Clones stemming from individual blastomeres of the 16-cell and earlier stages. Dev Biol 71:191–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson M (1983) Clonal organization of the central nervous system of the frog. III. Clones stemming from individual blastomeres of the 128-, 256-, and 512-cell stages. J Neurosci 3:1019–1038

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson M, Klein SL (1985) Analysis of clonal restriction of cell mingling inXenopus. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 312:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones EA, Woodland HR (1987) The development of animal cap cells inXenopus: a measure of the start of animal cap competence to form mesoderm. Development 101:557–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller RE (1975) Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula ofXenopus laevis I. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the superficial layer. Dev Biol 42:222–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller RE (1976) Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula ofXenopus laevis II. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the deep layer. Dev Biol 51:118–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller RE (1978) Time lapse cinemicrographic analysis of superficial cell behavior during and prior to gastrulation inXenopus laevis. J Morphol 157:223–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller RE (1984) The cellular basis of gastrulation inXenopus laevis: Active, postinvolution convergence and extension by mediolateral interdigitation. Am Zool 24:589–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller RE, Danilchik M (1988) Regional expression, pattern and timing of convergence and extension during gastrulation ofXenopus laevis. Development 103:193–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller RE, Danilchik M, Gimlich R, Shih J (1985) The function and mechanism of convergent extension during gastrulation ofXenopus laevis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 89:185–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein SL (1984) Studies on the interactions betweenXenopus blastomeres. Dissertation University of Utah

  • Klein SL (1987) The first cleavage furrow demarcates the dorsalventral axis inXenopus embryos. Dev Biol 120:299–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moody SA (1987a) Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stageXenopus embryo. Dev Biol 119:560–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moody SA (1987b) Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell stageXenopus embryo. Dev Biol 122:300–319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moody SA, Jacobson M (1983) Compartmental relationships between anuran primary spinal motoneurons and somitic muscle fibers that they first innervate. J Neurosci 3:1670–1682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscona A (1952) Cell suspensions from organ rudiments of chick embryos. Exp Cell Res 3:535–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscona A (1956) Development of heterotypic combinations of dissociated embryonic chick cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 92:410–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakatsuji N, Johnson KE (1982) Cell locomotion in vitro byXenopus laevis gastrula mesodermal cells. Cell motility 2:149–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakatsuji N, Johnson KE (1983) Conditioning of a culture substratum by the ectodermal layer promotes attachment and oriented locomotion by amphibian gastrula cells. J Cell Sci 59:43–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newport J, Kirschner M (1982) A major development transition in earlyXenopus embryos: I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula transition. Cell 30:675–686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop PD (1969) The formation of the mesoderm in urodelean amphibians. I. Induction by the endoderm. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 162:341–373

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brochta DA, Bryant PJ (1985) A zone of non-proliferating cells at a lineage restriction boundary inDrosophila. Nature 313:138–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paleček J, Ubbels GA, Rzehak K (1978) Changes in the external and internal pigmentation pattern upon fertilization in the egg ofXenopus laevis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 45:203–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slack JMW (1983) From egg to embryo. Determinative events in early development. In: Barlow PW, Green PB, Wylie CC (eds) Developmental and cell biology, Ser 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg MS (1963) Reconstitution of tissues by dissociated cells. Science 141:401–408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg MS (1981) The adhesive specification of tissue self-organization. In: Connelly TG (ed) Morphogenesis and pattern formation. Raven Press, New York, pp 179–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Townes PL, Holtfreter J (1955) Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J Exp Zool 128:53–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetts R, Fraser SE (1989) Slow intermixing of cells during Xenopus embryogenesis contributes to the consistency of the blastomere fate map. Development 105:9–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, S.L., Jacobson, M. In vitro evidence that interactions betweenXenopus blastomeres restrict cell migration. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 199, 237–245 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682083

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682083

Key words

Navigation