Advertisement

Early surgical treatment of secondary bone lesions excluding the spine

  • L. E. Gayet
  • F. Morand
  • P. Pries
  • J. P. Clarac
Original articles
  • 21 Downloads

Summary

The treatment of secondary bone lesions remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the advantage of early surgical treatment with a functional outcome. Our series consists of 66 cases, including 11 cases where there were two operations, that is 77 prophylactic or fracture treatments, on metastatic bone lesions or secondary myelomas. Operations were only on long bones (56 femurs, 19 humeri, 1 clavicle and 1 fibula). There were 11 prophylactic operations on the femur with 4 Ender pins, 4 open reductions and 3 total hip prostheses, including one using an allograft. In the case of fractures, we carried out 12 closed reductions, 9 open reductions, and 24 hip artroplasties of which 6 were “special tumour” total prostheses, 3 using an allograft. As for the humerus, 10 retrograde fasciculated Hacketal osteosyntheses were carried out, of which 7 were prophylactic and 10 were fracture cases. Likewise we carried out 2 arthroplasties cemented using allograft for pathological fractures of the upper extremity of the femur. Our own departmental grading system enabled us to evaluate the results. For femurs, we obtained 46% good early results for pain and 38% of the total for function. The average survival period for those patients operated on for prophylaxil was 14 months. For those operated on for fracture it was no more than 5 months. For humeri, good results were 58% of the total for pain, and 62% for function. The average survival period for those patients operated on for promylaxis was 17 months. It was just 7 months for those operated on for fracture.

The main aim of surgical treatment of secondary bony lesions is to relieve the pain of the patient, but also, if possible, to preserve and even restore function. This treatment is fundamental in handling cancer patients. Our series of 77 consecutive cases demonstrates that both the functional analgesic results and the survival of patients are clearly better where there is prophylactic surgery. These encouraging results should teach us to thoroughly investigate in order to firstly diagnose secondary lesions early, and then to treat them before the onset of fractures and their complications.

Key words

Bone metastases Surgical treatment Preventive treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alcalay M, Azais I, Brigeon B, et col (1995) Strategy for identifying primary malignancies with inaugural bone metastases. Rev Rhum (Engl Ed) 62: 632–642Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avrahami E, Tadmor R, Dalkley O, Hadar H (1987) Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans. Clin Radiol 38: 351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bono B, Cazzaniga P, Pini V, et al. (1991) Palliative surgery of metastatic bone disease. A review of 83 cases. Eur J Cancer 27: 556–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bunting RW (1995) Rehabilitation of cancer patients with skeletal metastasis. Clin Orthop 312: 197–200Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan D, Carter SN, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS (1992) Endoprothetic replacement for bone metastases. Ann R Col Surg Engl 74: 13–18Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conroy T, Malissard L, Dartois D, Luporsi E, Stines J (1988) Histoire naturelle et évolution des métastases osseuses. A propos de 429 observations. Bull Cancer 75: 845–857PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daffner RH, Lupetin AR, Dash N, et al. (1986) MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. AJR 146: 353–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damron TA, Sim FH, Shives TC, An KN, Rock MG, Pritchard DJ (1996) Intercalary spacers in the treatment of segmentaly destructive diaphyseal humeral lesions in disseminated malignancies. Clin Orthop 324: 233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delepine G, Goutallier D (1985) Étude critique des techniques d'ostéosynthèses des fractures métastatiques de l'humérus. Réflexions à propos de 39 cas consécutifs. Compte rendu des Journées de Printemps franco-italiennes, Rev Chir Orthop 71: 412Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duparc J (1983) Le traitement chirurgical des métastases osseuses des membres. Cahier d'enseignement de la SOFCOT Expansion Sci Franç ed Paris 18: 5–30Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Durandeau A, Geneste R (1977) Traitement chirurgical des fractures métastatiques des os longs. A propos de 73 cas. Rev Chir Orthop 63: 501–518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dutoit M (1995) Utilisation des allogreffes massives dans le traitement chirurgical des métastases osseuses. SOFCOT 69e Réunion Anuelle 81 [Suppl. 2]: 185Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franck J, Ling A, Patronas N (1990) Detection of malignant bone tumours: MR imaging vs scintigraphy. AJR 155: 1043–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galasko CSB (1995) Diagnosis of skeletal metastases and assessment of response to treatment. Clin Orthop 312: 64–75Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gainor BJ, Buchert P (1983) Fracture healing in metastastic bone disease. Clin Orthop 178: 297–302Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gayet LE, Muller A, Pries P, et al. (1992) Fractures de la diaphyse humérale: place de l'embrochage fasciculé selon Hacketal. A propos de 129 cas. Rev Chir Orthop 78: 13–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greenberg EJ, Chu F, Dwyer AJ, et al. (1972) Effects of radiation therapy on bone lesions as measured by 47Ca and 85Sr local kinetics. J Nucl Med 13: 747–751Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hipp JA, Springfield DS, Hayes WC (1995) Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects. Clin Orthop 312: 120–135Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoskin PJ (1995) Radiotherapy in the management of bone pain. Clin Orthop 312: 105–119Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Houston SJ, Rubens RD (1995) The systemic treatment of bone metastases. Clin Orthop 312: 95–104Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huten D, Duparc J (1987) Actualité sur le traitement chirurgical des métastases osseuses. EMC Appareil Locomoteur 14030 E-10: 4Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meary R, Postel M, Tomeno B, Forest M (Paris), Bruot Ph (Limoges) (1976) Fractures métastatiques du fémur. A propos de 100 cas. Rev Chir Orthop 62: 761–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mirels H (1989) Metastatic disease in long bones. A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop 249: 256–264Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sim FH, Frassica FJ, Chao EYS (1995) Orthopaedic management using new devices and prothesis. Clin Orthop 312: 160–172Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yasawa Y, Frassica FJ, Chao EYS, Pritchard DJ, Sim FH, Shives TC (1990) Metastatic bone disease. A study of the surgical treatment ot 166 pathological humeral and femoral fractures. Clin Orthop 251: 213–219Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zickel RE, Mouradian WH (1976) Intramedulary fixation of pathological fractures and lesions of the subtrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 58-A: 1061–1066Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. E. Gayet
    • 1
  • F. Morand
    • 1
  • P. Pries
    • 1
  • J. P. Clarac
    • 1
  1. 1.Hospital Practitioners, Prof. Clarac's Adult and Child Orthopaedic/Casualty DepartmentCHRU de la Milétrie, Hôpital Jean-BernardPoitiersFrance

Personalised recommendations