Summary
Objective: To assess the utilization of MRI by the orthopaedic department of a University Teaching Hospital for the investigation of musculoskeletal conditions affecting the extremities.Design: During a 12 month period, all patients referred for MRI of an extremity were enrolled in the study. Clinical details of presentation, surgical management and outcome were prospectively recorded.Patients: 91 patients were included with a mean age of 35 years. The following anatomical areas were scanned; knee (48), shoulder (31), hip (3), soft tissues (6), brachial plexus (2), wrist (1).Results: A significant finding was reported in 56 patients (62%) and surgery was undertaken in 42. With regard to MRI of the knee the sensitivity of the investigation was 95%. Four patients were referred inappropriately for the investigation.Conclusions: Selective referral for MRI for the investigation of the injured knee represents an appropriate use of this scarce resource. It allows arthroscopy to be targetted to those patients in whom the procedure will be therapeutic. Unnecessary diagnostic knee arthroscopy can and should be avoided. The study supports increased orthopaedic access to MRI for non spinal conditions in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldor RA, Quirk ME, Dohan D (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging use by primary care physicians. J Family Pract 36: 281–85
Bassett LW, Gold RH (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. An overview. Clin Orth 244: 17–28
Boeree NR, Ackroyd CE (1991) Assessment of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: an audit of clinical practice. Injury 22: 291–294
Boeree NR, Watkinson AF, Ackroyd CE, Johnson C (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging of meniscal and cruciate injuries of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73-B: 452–457
Bradley WG Jr (1986) Comparing costs and efficacy of MRI. Am J Radiol 146: 1307–1310
Chissell HR, Allum RL, Keightley A (1994) MRI of the knee: its cost effective use in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76: 26–29
Cowley LT, Issacs HL, Young SW, Raffin TA (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging marketing and investment. Tensions between the forces of business and the practice of medicine. Chest 105: 920–928
Ehman RL, Berquist TH, McLeod RA (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system: a 5-year appraisal. Radiology 166: 313–320
Evens RG, Evens RG (1991) Analysis of economics and use of magnetic resonance imaging units in the United States in 1990. Am J Radiol 157: 603–607
Gelb HJ, Glasgow SG, Sapega AA, Torg JS (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of knee disorders. Clinical value and cost-effectiveness in a sports medicine practice. Am J Sports Med 24: 99–103
Heron CW, Calvert PT (1992) Three dimensional gradient echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients. Radiology 183: 839
Hisashige A (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging in Japan and the United States: analysis of utilization and economics. Am J Radiol 162: 511–512
Noble J (1992) Unnecessary arthroscopy. Editorial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 74-B: 797–798
Polly DW, Callaghan JJ, Silkes RA (1988) The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70-A: 192–198
Raunest J, Oberle K, Loehnert A, Hoetzinger H (1991) The clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of meniscal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 73-A: 11–16
Ruwe PA, Wright J, Randall RL, Lynch JK, Jokl P, McCarthy S (1992) Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy? Radiology 183: 335–339
Vosburgh CL, Kopta JA (1994) Appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging of the spine and extremities. Southern Med J 87: 801–804
Watt I (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73-B: 539–550
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harrington, P., McGrath, F. & Moran, R. Magnetic resonance imaging of the extremities. A critical appraisal of utilization by an orthopaedic service. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 8, 157–160 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681652
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681652