Dimensions which have been used to describe various aspects of studying are reviewed. These draw attention to three distinctive approaches to studying which contain elements of both study processes and motivation. The development of an inventory of approaches to studying is reported which confirmed the importance of these three dimensions, but also drew attention to the importance of characteristic styles of learning in describing the processes through which students arrive at different levels of under-standing.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Atkinson, J. W. and Raynor, J. O. (1974).Motivation and Achievement. New York: Winston/Wiley.
Biggs, J. B. (1976). “Dimensions of study behaviour: another look at ATI”,British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 68–80.
Biggs, J. (1979). “Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes”,Higher Education 8(4): 381–394.
Bruner, J. S. (1974).Beyond the Information Given. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Entwistle, N. J. (1975). “How students learn: information processing, intellectual development and confrontation”,Higher Education Bulletin 3: 129–148.
Entwistle, N. J. (1979). “Stages, levels, styles or strategies: dilemmas in the description of thinking,”Educational Review (forthcoming).
Entwistle, N. J. and Entwistle, D. M. (1970). “The relationships between personality, study methods and academic performance”,British Journal of Educational Psychology 40: 132–141.
Entwistle, N. J. and Wilson, J. D. (1970). “Personality, study methods and academic performance”,University Quarterly, 24: 147–156.
Entwistle, N. J. and Bennett, S. N. (1973). “The inter-relationships between personality, divergent thinking and school attainment”. Final report to SSRC on project HR 1346.
Entwistle, N. J., Thompson, J. B. and Wilson, J. D. (1974). “Motivation and study habits”,Higher Education 3: 379–396.
Entwistle, N. J. and Wilson, J. D. (1977).Degrees of Excellence: the Academic Achievement Game. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Entwistle, N. J., Hanley, M., and Ratcliffe, G. (1979). “Approaches to learning and levels of understanding”,British Journal of Educational Research (forthcoming).
Eysenck, H. J. (1970).The Structure of Human Personality. London: Routledge, Kegan & Paul.
Hudson, L. (1968).Frames of Mind. London: Methuen.
Laurillard, D. (1978). “A study of the relationships between some of the cognitive and contextual factors involved in student learning”. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Surrey.
Marton, F. (1976). “What Does It Take to Learn? Some Implications of an Alternative View of Learning”, in N. J. Entwistle, ed.,Strategies for Research and Development in Higher Education. pp. 32–43. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Miller, C. M. L. and Parlett, M. R. (1974).Up to the Mark: a Study of the Examination Game. London: SRHE.
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. and Bent, D. H. (1975).Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. (2nd edition) New York: McGraw Hill.
Parlett, M. R. (1970). “The Syllabus-Bound Student”, in L. Hudson, ed.,Ecology of Human Intelligence. pp. 272–283 Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Pask, G. (1976). “Styles and strategies of learning”,British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 128–148.
Ramsden, P. (1979). “Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment”,Higher Education 8(4): 411–427.
Svensson, L. (1977) “On qualitative differences in learning. III — Study skill and learning”,British Journal of Educational Psychology 47: 233–243.