Skip to main content

First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development

Abstract

This study sought answers to three questions: (1) Do the precollege characteristics of first-generation students differ from those of traditional students? (2) Do first-generation students' college experiences differ from those of other students? (3) What are the educational consequences of any differences on first-year gains in students' reading, math, and critical thinking abilities? Answers come from 2,685 students (825 first-generation and 1,860 traditional students) who entered 23 diverse institutions nationwide in Fall 1992 and who completed one year of study. First-generation students differ from their traditional peers in both entering characteristics and college experiences. Although traditional students make greater net gains in reading during their first year, the two groups gain to about the same degree in math and critical thinking skills. Those gains, however, appear to result from somewhat different experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • American College Testing Program (1989).Report on the Technical Characteristics of CAAP: Pilot Year 1, 1988–89. Iowa City, IA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education.Journal of College Student Personnel 25: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attinasi, L. C., Jr. (1989). Mexican Americans' perceptions of university attendance and the implications for freshman year persistence.Journal of Higher Education 60(3): 247–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P., and Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition.Review of Educational Research 55(4): 485–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., and Terry, B. T. (1982). In search of the silken purse: Factors in attrition among first-generation students.College and University 58(1): 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, M. E., and Dailey, A. R. (1981). Does consistency of parental encouragement matter for secondary students?Sociology of Education 54(4): 254–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K. P. (1981).Adults as Learners: Increasing Participation and Facilitating Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, H. L. (1985).All One System: Demographics of Education, Kindergarten Through Graduate School. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara, J. (1992). Reflections: Bridging cultures. In L. S. Zwerling and H. B. London (eds.),First-Generation Students: Confronting the Cultural Issues (pp. 65–70). New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A., and Associates (1989).Shaping Higher Education's Future: Demographic Realities and Opportunities, 1990–2000. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, H. B. (1989). Breaking away: A study of first-generation college students and their families.American Journal of Education 97(1): 144–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mow, S. L., and Nettles, M. T. (1990). Minority student access to, and persistence and performance in, college: A review of the trends and research literature. In J. S. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: (Vol. 6) (pp. 35–105). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E. (1981). Consumer buying roles in college choice: Parents' and students' perceptions.College and University 56(2): 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1984).Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences. Los Angeles: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantages, T. J., and Creedon, C. F. (1978). Studies of college attrition: 1950–1975.Review of Educational Research 48(1): 49–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 1). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Bohr, L., Nora, A., and Terenzini, P. T. (1996). Is differential exposure to college linked to the development of critical thinking?Research in Higher Education 37(2): in press.

  • Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1991).How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, P. A., and Skaggs, C. T. (1989). First-generation college students: Are they at greater risk for attrition than their peers?Research in Rural Education 6(2): 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendon, L. I. (1992). From the barrio to the academy: Revelations of a Mexican American “scholarship girl.” In L. S. Zwerling and H. B. London (eds.),First-Generation Students: Confronting the Cultural Issues (pp. 55–64). New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. C., Jr., and Skinner. E. F. (1992). Helping first-generation minority students achieve degrees. In L. S. Zwerling and H. B. London (eds.),First-Generation Students: Confronting the Cultural Issues (pp. 29–43). New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, R. (1975). Going home again: The new American scholarship boy.American Scholar 44: 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, R. (1982).Hunger of Memory: The Education of Richard Rodriguez—An Autobiography. Boston, MA: Godine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. F., and Richardson, R. C., Jr. (1988, May/June). Making it in a majority university: The minority graduate's perspective.Change 20(3): 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, L. C., and Gordon, J. J. (1981).The Characteristics and Needs of Adults in Postsecondary Education. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. G. (1970). Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis.Interchange 1(1): 64–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stage, F. K., and Hossler, D. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders.Research in Higher Education 30(3), 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T., Rendon, L. I., Upcraft, M. L., Millar, S. B., Allison, K. A., Gregg, P. L., and Jalomo, R. (1994). The transition to college: Diverse students, diverse stories.Research in Higher Education 35(1): 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research 45(1): 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1987).Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upcraft, M. L. (1996). Teaching and today's college students. In R. Menges and M. Weimer (eds.),Teaching on Solid Ground: Using Scholarship to Improve Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G., and Glaser, E. (1980).Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 5). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L. (1985).Between Two Worlds: Black Students in an Urban Community College. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L. (1992). Discordant voices in the urban community college. In L. S. Zwerling and H. B. London (eds.),First-Generation Students: Confronting the Cultural Issues (pp. 13–27). New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. (1979). Defining and measuring the competencies of a liberal arts education. InCurrent Issues in Higher Education (vol. 5). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D., McClelland, D., and Stewart, A. (1981).A New Case for the Liberal Arts: Assessing Institutional Goals and Student Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • York-Anderson, D. C., and Bowman, S. L. (1991). Assessing the college knowledge of first-generation and second-generation college students.Journal of College Student Development 32(2): 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terenzini, P.T., Springer, L., Yaeger, P.M. et al. First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Res High Educ 37, 1–22 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680039

Keywords

  • College Student
  • Critical Thinking
  • Education Research
  • Cognitive Development
  • Thinking Skill