Abstract
Computer-based technology is increasingly becoming available for students at all grade levels in schools, and its promise and power as a learning tool is being extolled by many. From a constructive perspective, if individuals actively construct meaning from their experiences, then simply having particular tools to work with via a computer doesn't ensure that desired learning will result. Thus, it is important to examine how students construct meaning while using such tools. This study examined what fourth grade students learned from the use of two computer-based tools intended to help them understand sound and music: software that emulated an oscilloscope and allowed students to view sound waves from audio input; and software that turned the computer into an electronic keyboard, which provided students with standard pitches for comparison purposes. Principles ofselective attention andpior knowledge and experiences—foundational ideas of a constructivist epistemology—were useful in understanding learning outcomes from inquiry with these tools. Our findings provide critical information for future instruction with the goal of supporting learning about sound and music from such tools. They also indicate the need for more studies examining learning from computer-based tools in specific contexts, to advance our understanding of how teachers can mediate student activity with computer-based tools to support the development of conceptual understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backus, J. (1977).The Acoustical Foundations of Music, W. W. Norton, New York.
Berger, C. F., Lu, C. R., Belzer, S. J., and Voss, B. E. (1994). Research on the uses of technology in science education. In Gabe D. L. (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York.
Brown, J. S. (1985). Process versus produce: A perspective on tools for communal and informal electronic learning. In Chen, M., and Paisley, W. (Eds.).Children and Microcomputers: Research in the Newest Medium, Sage, Beverly Hills, California (pp. 466–490).
Cook, N. (1993). Perception: A perspective from music theory. In Sloboda, J. A., and Aiello, R. (Eds.),Musical perceptions, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Darrow, A. A. (1990). The role of hearing in understanding music.Music Educators Journal 77 (4): 24–27.
de Corte, E., Linn, M., and Verschaffel, L. (eds.) (1992).Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem-Solving. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Douglas, B., and Moustakas, C. (1984).Heuristic Inquiry: The Internal Search to Know. Detroit, Michigan: Center for Humanistic Studies.
Flowers, P. J., and Costa-Giomi, E. (1991). Verbal and nonverbal identification of pitch changes in a familiar song by English-and Spanish-speaking preschool children.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education. 107: 1–12.
Gardner, H. (1987). The theory of multiple intelligences.Annals of Dyslexia 37: 19–35.
Hanson, N. R. (1958).Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hawkins, J., and Pea, R. D. (1987). Tools for bridiging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking.Journal for Research in Science Teaching. 24, 291–307.
Jordan-DeCarbo, J. (1989). The effect of pre-training conditions and age on pitch discrimination ability of preschool children.Journal of Research in Music Education 37(2): 132–145.
Katz, J. (1983). A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic fieldwork. In Emerson, R. M. (Ed.),Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings, Waveland Press, Inc., Prospect Heights, Illinois.
Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues.American Psychologist 40: 1–18.
Lepper, M. R., and Gurtner, J. L. (1989). Children and computers: Approaching the teenty-first century.American Psychologist 44: 170–178.
Levin, J. A., and Waugh, M. (1988). Educational simulations, tools, games and microworlds: Computer-based enviroments for learning.International Journal of Educational Research 12: 71–80.
Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., and Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education?Journal of Science Education and Technology 3(1): 7–15.
Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., Lewis, E. L., and Stern, J. (1993). Using Technology to teach thermodynamics: Achieving intergrated understanding. In Ferguson, D. L. (Ed.)Advanced Technologies in the Teaching of Mathematics and Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (10: 5–60).
Magnusson, S. J. and Palincsar, A. S. (1995). Learning environments as a site of science education reform.Theory into Practice 34(1): 43–50.
Magnusson, S. J. and Palincsar, A. S. (in press). “We didn't try one with no water, so we don't know”: Fourth graders' investigations of sound and music. Science Education.
Magnusson, S. J., Templin, M., and Boyle, R. A. (in press). Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change.Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Osborne, R. J., and Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process.Science Education 67(4): 489–504.
Osborne, R. J., and Wittrock, M. C. (1985). The generative learning model and its implication for science education.Studies in Science Education 12: 59–87.
Papert, S. (1980).Mindstorms, Basic Books, New York.
Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning.Educational Psychologist 20: 167–182.
Ramsey, J. H. (1983). The effects of age, singing ability, and instrumental experiences on preschool children's melodic perception.Journal of Reserch in Music Education 31(2): 133–145.
Roth, W-M. (1995). Affordances of computers in teacher-student interactions: The case of Interactive PhysicsTM.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 329–347.
Ruopp, R. R., Gal, S., and Pfister, M. (Eds.) (1993).Labnet—Toward a Community of Practice: The Case of High School Physics Teachers Project Science, and New Technologies, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Salomon, G. (1988). Artificial intelligence in reverse: Computer tools that turn cognitive.Journal of Educational Computing Research 4: 123–139.
Salomon, G. (1990). Cognitive effects with and of computer technology.Communication Research 17: 26–44.
Salomon, G. (1992). New challenges for educational research: Studying the individual within learning enviroments.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 36(3): 167–182.
Siegler, R. S., and Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development.American Psychologist 46: 606–620.
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., and Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition.Journal of the Learning Sciences 3: 115–163.
Stein, J. S. (1986). The computer as lab partner: Classroom experience gleaned from one year of microcomputer-based laboratory use.Journal of Educational Technology Systems 15(3).
Woolgar, S. (1990). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. In Lynch, M., and Woolgar, S. (Eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice (pp. 123–152). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magnusson, S.J. Complexities of learning with computer-based tools: A case of inquiry about sound and music in elementary school. J Sci Educ Technol 5, 297–309 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677126
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677126