Skip to main content
Log in

International cournol duopoly and R&D subsidies under demand uncertainly

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Establishing a third-market model of international Cournot duopoly where home and foreign firms choose optimal R&D levels under demand uncertainty, this paper reexamines results on R&D subsidies proposed by Spencer and Brander [Review of Economic Studies 50 (1983): 707–722]. It is assumed that R&D subsidies consist of fixed and variable parts, demand uncertainty is of the additive type, and firms are risk averse. It is shown that signs of the effects of a change in a home fixed R&D subsidy are definitely determined, but those of a change in a home variable R&D subsidy are ambiguous, and, as a result, signs of optimal home R&D subsidies are also ambiguous even if the foreign R&D reaction curve is downward-sloping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. (1965):Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Helsinki: Yrj Jahnsson Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvan, L. (1991): Flexibility versus Commitment in Strategic Trade Policy under Uncertainty: a Model of Endogenous Policy Leadership.Journal of International Economics 31: 341355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., and Staiger, R. (1994): The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Oligopolistic Industries.Journal of International Economics 36: 133150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. (1971): Demand Uncertainty in Imperfect Competition.International Economic Review 12: 196208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J., and Spencer, B. (1983): Strategic Commitment with R&D: the Symmetric Case.Bell Journal of Economics 14: 225235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniglia, A. (1986): Variable versus Fixed Rate Subsidies: Are the Latter Necessarily Less Efficient?Public Finance Quarterly 14: 100106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D., and Helpman, E. (1995): International R&D Spillovers.European Economic Review 39: 859887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1986): Comparative Statics for Oligopoly.International Economic Review 27: 107122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, D. (1976): Input Choices and Uncertain Demand.American Economic Review 66: 94103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, Y. (1979): On the Theory of Monopoly under Demand Uncertainty.Journal of Economics/Zeitschrift fr Nationalkonomie 39: 105118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M., Muller, E., and Zang, I. (1992): Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels.American Economic Review 82: 12931306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. (1972): Theory of the Firm Facing Uncertain Demand.American Economic Review 62: 278291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagiwa, K., and Ohno, Y. (1997): Strategic R&D Policy and Appropriability.Journal of International Economics 42: 125148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (1964): Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.Econometrica 32: 122136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1971): On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty.American Economic Review 61: 6573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivakumar, R. (1993): Strategic Trade Policy: Choosing between Export Subsidies and Export Quotas under Uncertainty.Journal of International Economics 35: 169183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B., and Brander, J. (1983): International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy.Review of Economic Studies 50: 707722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishii, Y. International cournol duopoly and R&D subsidies under demand uncertainly. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 72, 203–222 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676983

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676983

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation