Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the oxidation behavior of Mg-implanted steel samples

  • Published:
Oxidation of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mg-implanted AISI 321 steel samples (implantation-energy 40 keV, dose: 2 * 1017 ions/cm2), were oxidized in air in the temperature region 350–650°C for several days. Nuclear Reaction Analysis (NRA) and Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy (RBS) were used to determine the oxygen concentration in the oxidized samples. An enhancement of the oxidation rate on the implanted material in comparison to the non-implanted was observed at high temperatures. It was demonstrated that the oxidation of Mg-implanted steel proceeds by two different mechanisms, at 350–550°C on the one hand and at 550–650°C on the other. The magnesium-depth distribution, determined by NRA (using the24Mg(α, P)27Al reaction), RBS and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) also indicated a diffusion of the element at high temperatures confirming these assumptions. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) were applied to investigate the surface morphology and to explain the influence of Mg-ion implantation on the oxidation behavior of AISI 321 austenitic stainless steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. J. Bennett, H. E. Bishop, P. R. Chalker, and A. T. Tuson,Mater. Sci. Eng. 90, 177 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Pons, M. Caillet, and A. Galerie,Nucl. Instr. Meth. 209/210, 1011 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Noli, P. Misaelides, P. Spathis, M. Pilakouta, and H. Baumann,Nucl. Inst. Meth. B68, 398 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Noli, P. Misaelides, G. Giorginis, H. Baumann, and H. Hausner,Nucl. Inst. Meth. B113, 171 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Ensinger and G. K. Wolf,Mater. Sci. Eng. A116, 1 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Pons, A. Galerie, and M. Caillet,Defect Diff. Forum 57-58, 189 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. W. Cahn and P. Haasen,Physical Metallurgy (Elsevier Science Publ. 1983), p. 154.

  8. Metals Handbook, 8th Ed. (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1985), p. 1213.

  9. L. R. Doolittle, Computer code RUMP based on: Algorithms of the rapid simulation of Rutherford backscattering spectra,Nucl. Instr. Meth. B9, 334 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Misaelides and F. Noli, Cross Sections Determination of the24Mg(a, p)27AI Nuclear Reaction (to be published).

  11. R. Molins, J. D. Bartout, and Y. Bienvenu,Mater. Sci. Eng. A135, 111 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Galerie,Ion Implantation into Metals (Pergamon, Oxford, 1982), p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. I. Howe, B. McEnaney, V. D. Scott, and G. Daernaley,Ion Implantation into Metals (Pergamon, Oxford, 1982), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noli, F., Misaelides, P., Giorginis, G. et al. Investigation of the oxidation behavior of Mg-implanted steel samples. Oxid Met 48, 225–241 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01670501

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01670501

Key Words

Navigation