Skip to main content
Log in

Fertilizer placement experiments

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The results are given of an investigation in the Netherlands, made over a number of years, on placement of fertilizers. This new method of application has been tested in field trials, in which placement has been compared with the usual method of broadcasting at certain increasing levels of fertilizer. The experiments relate to nitrogen, phosphate and potash on different kinds of crops and soils.

Generally speaking, it would appear that placement is better than broadcasting. The difference between the two methods of application can be represented by a factor indicating the ratio between the amounts of fertilizer giving the same yield for both. Nitrogen applied in bands is about 1.20 times as effective as broadcasting for cereals, potatoes and beets; phosphate for pulse crops 7.50, for maize 2.90, for cereals 2.45, for potatoes 1.90 and for beets 1.20; potash on river clay for cereals 3.65, for potatoes 1.00 at low pH and 1.60 at high pH and for beets 1.00. There are indications that the prevention of fixation and a better early growth as a result of the localisation of the fertilizer near the seed at an adequate depth are reasons why placement is successful.

The conclusions of de Wit with regard to the effect of placement are not corroborated. It appears that placement gives higher yields at light dressings, and at heavy dressings yields as high as broadcasting, whereas, according to de Wit, a favourable effect would be attained, as a rule, with light dressings and an unfavourable effect with heavy dressings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Anonymous, Agr. Eng. Records1, 171–172, 240–244 (1945/1947).

  2. Brenchley, W. E., The phosphate requirement of barley at different periods of growth. Ann. Botany43, 89–110 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooke, G. W., Recent advances in fertilizer placement II. Fertilizer placement in England. J. Sci. Food Agr.5, 429–440 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrari, Th. J., An agronomic research with potatoes on the river ridge soils of the Bommelerwaard (Du. with Eng. summary). Verslag. Landbouwkund. Onderzoek.58.1 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garderen, J. van, Walt, C. F. J. van der, and Stein, L. H., Radioactive phosphorus in a field study on phosphorus uptake by maize. S. African J. Sci.48, 226–231 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goedewaagen, M. A. J., Het wortelstelsel der landbouwgewassen. Edited by Dir. van de Landbouw, The Hague (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, L. G. and Warren, G. E., The efficiency of various methods of application of phosphorus for tomatoes. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.63, 309–319 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jordan, J., Simkins, C., Corey, G., Knight, R., and Baker, C. O., Uptake and movement of fertilizer phosphorus. Soil Sci.73, 305–313 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kendall, M. C., Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin and Company Lim., London (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson, W. L., Krantz, B. A., Welch, C. D. and Hall, N. S., Utilization of phosphorus as affected by placement: II. Cotton and corn in North Carolina. Soil Sci.68, 137–144 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paauw, F. van der, Die Bedeutung einer gelichmäszigen Verteilung der Kunstdünger (Du. with Germ. summary). Verslag. Landbouwkund. Onderzoek.46 (10) A (1940).

  12. Paauw, F. van der, Relation between the lime status and the availability of phosphate on a sandy soil (Du. with Eng. summary). Verslag. Landbouwkund. Onderzoek.56.8 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prummel, J., Placement of fertilizers. Trans. Sixth. Intern. Congr. Soil Sci. Paris 1956IV, 167–171 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roemer, Th., Die Verteilung der Düngemittel im Boden. Ernähr. Pflanze30, 203 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scharrer, R. and Kühn, H., Studien über die Aufnahme der Phosphorsäure aus markiertem Superphosphat. Landwirtsch. Forschung7, 163–169 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Torstensson, G., Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Verteilung der Düngerphosphorsäure im Ackerboden bei verschiedener Art der Aufbringung. Lantbrukshögsk. Ann.4 (1937).

  17. Welch, C. D., Hall, N. S. and Nelson, W. L., Utilization of fertilizer and soil phosphorus by soybeans. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1949,14, 231–235 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wit, C. T. de, A physical theory on placement of fertilizers. Verslag. Landbouwkund. Onderzoek.59.4 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prummel, J. Fertilizer placement experiments. Plant Soil 8, 231–253 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01666159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01666159

Keywords

Navigation