Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative activity of ofloxacin and seven other antimicrobials against urea-splitting microorganisms

Wirksamkeit von Ofloxacin und sieben anderen antimikrobiellen Substanzen gegen aus Urin isolierte harnstoffspaltende Mikroorganismen

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Urinary tract infections caused by ureasplitting bacteria are severe clinical conditions and very difficult to treat due to their association with calculi, and because such bacteria form ammonium hydroxide raising the urinary pH and thereby creating an unfavourable condition for the action of most antimicrobials. We tested ofloxacin, norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, gentamicin, co-trimoxazole and nitrofurantoin against 143 gram-negative and 99 gram-positive bacteria, all ureasplitting, isolated from patients with urinary tract infections. All drugs were tested using media at two different pHs (pH 7.4 and PH 8.5) and two inoculum sizes (104 and 106 cfu). Although ofloxacin and norfloxacin had a similar spectrum of activity, ofloxacin had somewhat greater intrinsic activity against grampositive organisms. MICs of ofloxacin for 90% ofProteus mirabilis, indole-positiveProteus spp.,Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and theCorynebacterium group D2 were ≥ 4 mg/l. The activity of the other drugs varied, but there were many strains resistant to these antimicrobials. The pH and inoculum size did not significantly affect the activity of ofloxacin so that this drug should be useful for the treatment of urinary tract infections caused by the commonest urea-splitting bacteria involved in such infections.

Zusammenfassung

Harnwegsinfektionen, die durch harnstoffspaltende Bakterien verursacht sind, stellen eine schwierige klinische Situation dar, da sie mit Steinbildung assoziiert sind und zudem infolge von Ammoniumhydroxydbildung den pH des Urins anheben und somit ungünstige Voraussetzungen für die Wirkung der meisten antimikrobiellen Substanzen schaffen. Wir haben Ofloxacin, Norfloxacin, Nalidixinsäure, Amoxicillin, Amoxicillin-Clavulansäure, Gentamicin, Co-trimoxazol und Nitrofurantoin auf ihre Aktivität gegen 143 gramnegative und 99 grampositive, harnstoffspaltende Bakterien geprüft, die von Patienten mit Harnwegsinfektionen isoliert worden waren. Die Testung aller Antibiotika wurde mit Medien bei zwei verschiedenen pH-Werten (pH 7,4 und pH 8,5) und mit zwei verschiedenen Inokulumgrößen (104 und 106 KBE) vorgenommen. Trotz eines weitgehend ähnlichen Wirkungsspektrums war die intrinsische Aktivität von Ofloxacin gegen grampositive Erreger höher. Die MHK90-Werte von Ofloxacin fürProteus mirabilis, indolpositiveProteus spp.,Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, koagulasenegative Staphylokokken undCorynebacterium Gruppe D2 lagen bei ≤ 4 mg/l. Die übrigen Antibiotika besaßen unterschiedliche Aktivität, doch waren viele der getesteten Stämme gegen diese Substanzen resistent. Die Aktivität von Ofloxacin wurde durch den pH und die Inokulumgröße nicht wesentlich beeinflußt. Es ist daher anzunehmen, daß sich Ofloxacin für die Behandlung von Harnwegsinfektionen durch die häufigsten harnstoffspaltenden Erreger eignet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Seibert, G., Limbert, M., Klessel, N. Comparison of the antibacterialin vitro andin vivo activity of ofloxacin (HOE 280 DL 8280) and nalidixic acid analogues. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2 (1983) 548–553.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wise, R., Andrews, J. M., Danks, G. In vitro activity of enoxacin (CI-919), a new quinoline derivative, compared with that of other antimicrobial agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 13 (1984) 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly, M. C., Smith, I. D., Anstey, R. J., Thornley, J. H., Rennie, R. P. Rapid identification of antibiotic-resistant corynebacteria with the API 20 S system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 19 (1984) 245–247.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soriano, F., Ponte, C., Santamaria, M., Aguado, J. M., Wilhelmi, I., Vela, R., Cifuentes, L. Corynebacterium group D2 as a cause of alkaline-encrusted cystitis: report of four cases and characterization of the organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21 (1985) 788–792.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwood, D., Osman, M., Goodwin, J., Cowlishaw, W. A., Slack, R. Norfloxacin: activity against urinary tract pathogens and factors influencing the emergence of resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 13 (1984) 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reeves, D. S., Bywater, M. J., Holt, H. A., White, L. O. In vitro studies with ciprofloxacin, a new 4-quinolone compound. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 13 (1984) 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reeves, D. S., Bywater, M. J., Holt, H. A. The activity of enoxacin against clinical bacterial isolates in comparison with that of five other agents and factors affecting that activity. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 14 Suppl. C (1984) 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teoh-Chan, C. H., Cowslishaw, A., Eley, A., Slater, G., Greenwood, D. Laboratory evaluation of enoxacin: Comparison with norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 15 (1985) 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeiler, H. J., Grohe, K. Thein vitro andin vivo activity of ciprofloxacin. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 3 (1984) 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hanninen, P., Huovinen, P.: Comparative clinical evaluation of ofloxacin with conventional, antibacterial drugs in acute bacterial infections. 14th International Congress of Chemotherapy, Kyoto, Japan, June 23–28 (1985) WS-9–14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torres, A., Fernández-Roblas, R., Méndez, B. et al. Comparative activity of ofloxacin and seven other antimicrobials against urea-splitting microorganisms. Infection 14 (Suppl 4), S233–S236 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01661279

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01661279

Keywords

Navigation