Skip to main content

Decision analysis in surgical education

Abstract

Surgical education can no longer be considered adequate if limited to description of surgical diseases and methods of management. Due to the growth in numbers of surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, the surgeon of the future will find it increasingly necessary to understand the principles by which algorithms are constructed and by which individualized decisions should be made. Several systematic approaches for assisting clinical decision makers have been developed. Decision analysis is particularly appealing because it is flexible and readily adapted to a wide range of clinical situations. It explicitly guides the decision maker in determining the crucial variables in a clinical decision, and permits both objective data and personal preferences to play a part in decision making. Because it provides for personal estimates and preferences, decision analysis is not dehumanizing, even though it is quantitative, explicit, and mathematically rigorous. Topics for a series of seminars or case conferences are suggested. Decision analysis should be part of the intellectual preparation of every clinician.

Résumé

On ne peut plus admettre un enseignement de la chirurgie satisfaisant limité à la description des maladies et aux méthodes de traitement. Compte tenu de l'augmentation des procédés diagnostiques et thérapeutiques chirurgicaux, le chirurgien de demain dépendra de plus en plus de la compréhension des principes selon lesquels on construit des algorithmes et d'après lesquels toute décision individuelle devrait être prise. Il existe plusieurs approches pour aider la décision clinique. L'analyse décisionnelle est particulièrement attirante: de par sa souplesse elle s'adapte facilement à une large gamme de situations cliniques. Elle guide clairement le médecin dans sa décision en lui précisant les variables importantes qui entrent dans la décision en laissant données objectives et préférences personnelles jouer un rôle. Puisqu'elle prend en compte avis et préférences personnelles, l'analyse décisionnelle n'est point déshumanisée, tout en restant quantitative, explicite et mathématiquement rigoureuse. Des sujets de séminaires et de conférences sont suggérés. L'analyse décisionnelle doit faire partie intégrante de la préparation intellectuelle de tout médecin.

Resumen

La educación en cirugía ya no podrá considerarse como adecuada si sólo se limita a la descriptión de las enfermedades quirúrgicas y a los méthodos de manejo. En virtud del incremento en el número de procedimientos diagnósticos y terapéuticos, el cirujano del futuro habrá de encontrar cada vez mas necesario comprender los principios que se usan para la construction de algorritmos para la toma de decisiones individualizadas. Diversos enfoques sistemáticos para ayudar en la toma de decisiones clínicas han sido desarrollados. El análisis para la toma de decisiones es particularmente atrayente porque es flexible y fácilmente adaptable a una amplia gama de situaciones clínicas; en forma explícita guía a quien toma la decisión en la determinatión de las variables que son cruciales en una decisión clínica, y permite que tanto los datos objetivos como las preferencias personales jueguen un papel en la toma de decisiones. Porque permite estimaciones y preferencias personales, el análisis para la toma de decisiones no es una técnica deshumanizante, a pesar de ser cuantitativa, explicita, y matemáticamente rigurosa. Se sugieren tópicos para una serie de seminarios y conferencias clínicas para la profundización en la técnica de análisis para la toma de decisiones, una técnica que debe hacer parte de la preparatión intelectual de todo médico.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Weinstein, M.C., Fineberg, H.V., Elstein, A.S., Frazier, H.S., Neuhauser, D., Neutra, R.R., McNeil, B.J.: Clinical Decision Analysis, Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pauker, S.G., Kassirer, J.P.: Decision analysis. N. Engl. J. Med.316:250, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, J.R.: Surgical Judgment Using Decision Sciences, New York, Praeger, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iansek, R., Elstein, A.S., Balla, J.I.: Application of decision analysis to cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Lancet1:1132, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elstein, A.S., Holzman, G.B., Ravitch, M.M., Metheny, W.A., Holmes, M.M., Hoppe, R.B., Rothert, M.L., Rovner, D.R.: Comparison of physicians' decisions regarding estrogen replacement therapy for menopausal women and decisions derived from a decision analytic model. Am. J. Med.80:246, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clancy, C.J., Cebul, R.D., Williams, S.V.: Guiding individual decisions: A randomized, controlled trial of decision analysis. Am. J. Med.84:283, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moskowitz, A.J., Kuipers, B.J., Kassirer, J.P.: Dealing with uncertainty, risks, and tradeoffs in clinical decisions: A cognitive science approach. Ann. Intern. Med.108:435, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raiffa, H.: Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choice Under Uncertainty, Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  9. Einhorn, H.J.: Accepting error to make less error. J. Personality Assessment50:387, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brett, A.S.: Hidden ethical issues in clinical decision analysis. N. Engl. J. Med.305:1150, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elstein, A.S., Dawson-Saunders, B., Belzer, L.J.: Instruction in medical decision making: A report of two surveys. Med. Decision Making5:229, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell, E.J.M.: The diagnosing mind. Lancet1:849, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cebul, R.D., Beck, L.M., Carroll, J.G.: Teaching Clinical Decision Making, New York, Praeger, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sackett, D.L., Haynes, R.B., Tugwell, P.: Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine, Boston, Little-Brown, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  15. Balla, J.I.: The Diagnostic Process: A Model for Clinical Teachers, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sox, Jr., H.C., Blatt, M.A., Higgins, M.C., Marton, K.I.: Medical Decision Making, Stoneham, Massachusetts, Butterworths, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  17. Albert, D.A., Munson, R., Resnik, M.D.: Reasoning in Medicine, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cutler, P.: Problem Solving in Clinical Medicine: From Data to Diagnosis, 2nd ed., Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kassirer, J.P., Moskowitz, A.J., Lau, J., Pauker, S.G.: Clinical decision analysis: A progress report. Ann. Intern. Med.106:275, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  20. Norton, L.W., Eiseman, B.: Surgical Decision Making, 2nd ed., Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  21. Littenberg, B., Sox, Jr., H.C.: Evaluating individualized medical decision analysis. Am. J. Med.84:289, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eddy, D.: Clinical policies and the quality of clinical practice. N. Engl. J. Med.307:343, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bentham, J.: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, New York, Hafner, 1948

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mill, J.S.: Utilitarianism, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz, W.B.: Decision analysis: A look at the chief complaints. N. Engl. J. Med.300:556, 1979

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elstein, A.S. Decision analysis in surgical education. World J. Surg. 13, 287–291 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01659036

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01659036

Keywords

  • Decision Maker
  • Clinical Decision
  • Clinical Situation
  • Como
  • Decision Analysis