Skip to main content

Management of nipple discharge

Abstract

In a series of 8,703 breast operations, nipple discharge was the presenting symptom in 7.4% of cases. It is even more common in the office and clinic since many discharges can be treated medically. To be significant, a discharge should be true, spontaneous, persistent, and nonlactational. Of the 7 basic types, i.e., milky, multicolored and sticky, purulent, clear (watery), yellow (serous), pink (serosanguineous), and bloody (sanguineous), the last 4 are the surgically significant ones. Of the 586 patients operated on for one of these types of discharge, the majority had a benign etiology, i.e., intraductal papillomata (48.1%) and fibrocystie changes (32.9%), but 14.3% were due to cancer and another 7.3% to precancerous mastopathy. In the 84 patients with cancers, the false-negative rate for mammography was 9.5% and was 17.8% for cytology. There was no palpable mass in 13.1% of patients. There was an increasing likelihood of the discharge being due to cancer when the discharge was, in order of increasing frequency, yellow, pink, bloody, or watery, when it was accompanied by a lump, when it was unilateral and from a single duct, when the mammogram or galactogram and the cytology were positive, and when the patient was over 50 years of age.

Milky discharges are usually treated medically unless they are due to a pituitary adenoma. If the cause cannot be found and eradicated, bromocriptine is the drug of choice. Multicolored sticky discharges are also treated medically, chiefly by nipple hygiene, except when advanced. Purulent discharges are treated with appropriate antibiotics but abscesses need drainage and a biopsy of the wall. Except in women under 35 years of age or in those anxious to have children, surgically significant discharges are treated by central duct excision. Good cosmetic results can be obtained with careful technique and the danger of a recurrent discharge is eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Leis, Jr., H.P.: Evaluation of nipple discharge. In Early Breast Cancer Detection and Treatment, Part 2, H.S. Gallager, editor, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1975, p. 69

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Leis, Jr., H.P., Pilnik, S., Cammarata, A.: Diagnosis of nipple discharge. Female Patient,1:22, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pilnik, S., Leis, Jr., H.P.: Nipple discharge. In The Breast, ch. 43, H.S. Gallager, H.P. Leis, Jr., R.K. Snyderman, editors, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Co., 1978, p. 524

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Leis, Jr., H.P., Cammarata, A.: Nipple discharge; evaluation, cancer association and management. Diagn. Gynecol. Obstet.1:43, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Leis, Jr., H.P.: The significance of nipple discharge. In Breast Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment, G. Schwartz, D. Marchant, editors, New York, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1981, p. 111

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Leis, Jr., H.P.: Biopsy of surgically significant nipple discharges. Clin. Invest. Med.8:106, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Leis, Jr., H.P., Cammarata, A., LaRaja, R.D.: Nipple discharge: Significance and treatment. J. Breast (Diseases of the Breast)11:6, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Leis, Jr., H.P., Greene, F.L., Cammarata, A., Hilfer, S.E.: Nipple discharge: Surgical significance. Southern Med. J.81:22, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lavenant, F., Weber, J., Digabel-Chabay, C., Cousin, C., Bertrand, F.: Areolar discharge, Senologia1:301, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sartorius, O.W.: Breast Pap Smear Kit, Diagnostic, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana

  11. 11.

    Sartorius, O.W., Smith, H.S., Morris, P., Benedict, D., Friesen, L.: Cytological evaluation of breast fluid in the detection of breast diseases. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.59:1073, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rothenberg, R.E., Sabatini, M.T., LaRaja, R.D., Lobbato, V.: Mammary duct curettage for early detection of breast disease. J. Breast (Diseases of the Breast)8:26, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Inaji, H., Yayoi, E., Maeura, Y., Matsuura, N., Tominaga, S., Koyama, H., Takatsuka, Y., Mori, T.: Carcinoembrionic antigen estimation in nipple discharge as an adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of early breast cancer. Cancer60:3008, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tetirick, J.E.: Nipple discharge. Am. Fam. Physician22:101, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mori, H., Mori, S., Saitoh, Y., Arita, N., Aono, T., Uozumi, T., Mogami, H., Matsumoto, K.: Effects of bromocriptine on prolactin secreting pituitary adenomas. Cancer56:230, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bloodgood, J.C.: The clinical picture of dilated ducts beneath the nipple. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.36:486, 1923

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Adair, F.E.: Plasma cell mastitis. Arch. Surg.26:735, 1933

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Peters, F., Schuth, W.: Hyperproloactinemia and nonpuerperal mastitis (duct ectasia). J.A.M.A.261:1618, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Holleb, A.I., Farrow, J.H.: The significance of nipple discharge. CA (A Cancer Journal for Clinicians)16:182, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zuckerman, H.C.: The role of mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment, I.M. Ariel, J.B. Cleary, editors, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1987, pp. 152–171

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kopans, D.P., Meyer, J.E., Sadowsky, M.: Breast imaging. N. Engl. J. Med.310:960, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Katz, R., Lerner, M.A., Feller, N.: Galactography in nipple discharge: A statistical analysis and comparison with mammography. J. Breast (Diseases of the Breast)8:18, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Taber, L., Dean, P., Pentek, Z.: Galactography: The diagnostic procedure of choice for nipple discharge. Radiology149:11, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vio, A., Barbaniti, F., Dell'Amore, D., Ravaioli, A., Maltoni, M., Casadei Giunchi, D.: Intraductal papillomas: Diagnostic and surgical procedures. Ital. J. Surg. Sci.15:51, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Leis, Jr., H.P., Urban, J.A., Snyderman, R.K.: Management of potentially malignant breast lesions. In The Breast, H.S. Gallager, H.P. Leis, Jr., R.K. Snyderman, editors, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Co., 1978, pp. 208–218

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ohuchi, N., Abe, R., Takahashi, T., Tezuka, F.: Origin and extension of intraductal papillomas of the breast. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.4:117, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Leis, Jr., H.P., Greene, F.L. Cammarata, A., Hilfer, S.E.: Fibrocystic “disease” of the breast: What's in a name? Contemp. Surg.32:43, 1988

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Patrick Leis Jr. M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leis, H.P. Management of nipple discharge. World J. Surg. 13, 736–742 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01658424

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adenoma
  • Pituitary Adenoma
  • Bromocriptine
  • Present Symptom
  • Basic Type