Skip to main content

Suspected pancreatic cancer presenting as pain or weight loss: Analysis of diagnostic strategies

World Journal of Surgery volume 8, pages 839–845 (1984)Cite this article

Abstract

Comprehensive strategies for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were evaluated with decision analysis for accuracy, cost, and invasiveness. An optimal strategy began with ultrasonography followed by a combination of computerized tomography, needle aspiration biopsy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and laparotomy. The refined strategy established or excluded the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with sufficient reliability for clinical decisions. This strategy had an overall sensitivity of 92% and specificity was greater than 99%. The number of invasive tests increased with the prevalence of disease in the population, but the frequency of diagnostic laparotomy was only 1–9%. The comprehensive strategy could not be significantly improved without marked increases in the utilization of invasive technology.

Résumé

Les différentes méthodes de diagnostic du cancer du pancréas ont été étudiées aussi bien sur le plan de la précision que sur celui de leur coût et de leur caractère invasif. La stratégie la meilleure à observer consiste après ultrasonographie initiale à employer une combinaison des différentes méthodes suivantes: tomodensitométrie, biopsie aspiration à l'aiguille, cathétérisme rétrograde biliopancréatique et laparotomie exploratrice. Elle permet d'affirmer ou d'exclure le diagnostic présumé de cancer avec assez de précision pour que des décisions cliniques soient prises. Cette stratégie exploratrice présente une sensibilité de 92% et une spécificité supérieure à 99%. Le nombre des méthodes à employer est d'autant plus grand que les risques de cancer du pancréas sont plus élevés pour une population donnée, le taux de la laparotomie exploratrice étant finalement de 1–9%.

Il ne paraît pas possible d'aller au-delà des possibilités offertes par cette ligne de conduite à moins d'avoir recours à des méthodes plus invasives.

Resumen

Diversas estrategias comprensivas para el diagnóstico de cancer pancreático fueron evaluadas por medio del análisis de decisión para definir su sensibilidad, especificidad, costo y riesgo. La estrategia óptima se inicia con la ultrasonografía, seguida de una combinación de tomografía computadorizada, aspiración-biopsia con aguja, colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica y laparotomía. La estrategia refinada establece o excluye el diagnóstico de cáncer pancreático con suficiente confiabilidad para la toma de decisiones clínicas. Esta estrategia presenté una sensibilidad global de 92% y la especificidad fué de más de 99%. El número de pruebas invasivas aumentó con la preponderancia de la enfermedad en la población, pero la frecuencia de la laparotomía de diagnóstico fué de solo 1 a 9%. La estrategia comprensiva no pudo ser mejorada en una forma significativa sin un aumento marcado en la utilización de tecnologías invasivas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. DiMagno, E.P.: Pancreatic cancer: A continuing diagnostic dilemma. Ann. Intern. Med.90:847, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  2. Podolsky, D.K., McPhee, M.S., Alpert, E., Warshaw, A.L., Isselbacher, K.J.: Galactosyltransferase isoenzyme II in the detection of pancreatic cancer: Comparison with radiologic, endoscopic, and serologic tests. N. Engl. J. Med.304:1313, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cotton, P.B., Denyer, M.E., Kreel, L., Husband, J., Meire, H.B., Lees, W.: Comparative clinical impact of endoscopic pancreatography, gray scale ultrasonography, and computed tomography (EMI scanning) in pancreatic disease: Preliminary report. Gut19:679, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barkin, J., Vining, D., Miale, A., Jr., et al.: Computerized tomography, diagnostic ultrasound, and radionuclide scanning: Comparison of efficacy in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. J.A.M.A.238:2040, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wood, R.A.B., Moossa, A.R., Blackstone, M.O., Bowie, J., Collins, P., Lu, C.T.: Comparative value of four methods of investigating the pancreas. Surgery80:518, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzgerald, P.J., Fortner, J.G., Watson, R.C., et al.: The value of diagnostic aids in detecting pancreas cancer. Cancer41:868, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zollinger, R.M.: Cancer of the pancreas: The surgeon's dilemma. Am. J. Surg.143:279, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  8. Go, V.L.W., Taylor, W.F., DiMagno, E.P.: Efforts at early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: The Mayo Clinic experience. Cancer47:1698, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moossa, A.R., Levin, B.: The diagnosis of “early” pancreatic cancer: The University of Chicago experience. Cancer47:1688, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  10. DiMagno, E.P., Malagelada, J.R., Taylor, W.F., Go, V.L.W.: A prospective comparison of current diagnostic tests for pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.297:737, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lusted, L.B.: Decision-making studies in patient management. N. Engl. J. Med.284:416, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein, M.C., Stason, W.B.: Foundations of costeffectiveness analysis for health practices. N. Engl. J. Med.296:716, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  13. Silverstein, M.D.: A clinical decision analysis program for Apple computer. Med. Decis. Making3:29, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mackie, C.R., Bowie, J., Cooper, M.J., Kunzmann, A., Moossa, A.R.: Prospective evaluation of gray scale ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreas cancer. Am. J. Surg.136:575, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suramo, I., Lehtola, J., Leinonen, A., Kairaluoma, M.: The diagnostic accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography compared with ERP and arteriography in the detection of pancreatic carcinoma. Scand. J. Gastroent.14:993, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moss, A.A., Federle, M., Shapiro, H.A., Ohto, M., Goldberg, H., Korobkin, M., Clemett, A.: The combined use of computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the assessment of suspected pancreatic neoplasm: A blind clinical evaluation. Radiology134:159, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hessel, S.J., Siegelman, S.S., McNeil, B.J., Sanders, R., Adams, D.E., Alderson, P.O., Finberg, H.J., Abrams, H.L.: A prospective evaluation of computed tomography and ultrasound of the pancreas. Radiology143:129, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  18. Silvis, S.E., Rohrmann, C.A., Vennes, J.A.: Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in hepatic, biliary, and pancreatic malignancy. Ann. Intern. Med.84:438, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reuben, A., Cotton, P.B.: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.148:179, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freeny, P.C., Ball, T.J.: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) in the evaluation of suspected pancreatic carcinoma: Diagnostic limitations and contemporary roles. Cancer47:1666, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kruse, A., Thommesen, P., Fredericksen, P.: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis: Differences in morphologic changes in the pancreatic duct and the bile duct. Scand. J. Gastroenterol.13:513, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frick, M.P., Feinberg, S.B., Goodale, R.L.: The value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected carcinoma of the pancreas and indeterminant computed tomographic results. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.155:177, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mitty, H.A., Efremdis, S.C. Yeh, Hsu-Chong.: Impact of fine-needle biopsy on management of patients with carcinoma of the pancreas. A.J.R.137:1119, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrucci, J.T., Jr., Wittenberg, J., Mueller, P.R., Simeone, J.F., Harbin, W.P., Kirkpatrick, R.H., Taft, P.D.: Diagnosis of abdominal malignancy by radiologic fine-needle aspiration biopsy. A.J.R.134:323, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldstein, H.M., Zornoza, J., Wallace, S., Anderson, J.H., Bree, R.L., Samuels, B.I., Lukeman, J.: Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and other abdominal masses. Radiology123:319, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gudjonsson, B., Spiro, H.M.: Biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology75:726, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  27. Beazley, R.M.: Needle biopsy diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer47:1685, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gudjonsson, B., Livstone, E.M., Spiro, H.M.: Cancer of the pancreas: Diagnostic accuracy and survival statistics. Cancer42:1494, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gudjonsson, B.: Pancreatic carcinoma: Diagnostic and therapeutic approach—A word of caution. J. Clin. Gastroenterol.3:301, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  30. Griner, P.F., Mayewski, R.J., Mushlon, A.L., Greenland, P.: Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Ann. Intern. Med.94:553, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  31. Richter, J.M., Silverstein, M.D., Schapiro, R.H.: Suspected obstructive jaundice: A decision analysis of diagnosis strategies. Ann. Intern. Med.99:46, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  32. Crile, G., Jr.: The advantages of bypass operations over radical pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.130:1049, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brooks, D.C., Osteen, R.T., Gray, E.B., Jr., Steele, G.D., Jr., Wilson, R.E.: Evaluation of palliative procedures for pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Surg.141:430, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scarr, M.G., Cameron, J.L.: Surgical management of unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas. Surgery91:123, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  35. Anaker, H., Lamarque, J.L., Pistolesi, G.F.: Efficiency of different radiodiagnostic techniques in pancreatic disorders. Europ. J. Radiol.1:79, 1981

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Medical Service (Medical Practice Evaluation Unit, Primary Care Program, and Gastrointestinal Unit) and Surgical Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA

    Marc D. Silverstein M.D., James M. Richter M.D., Daniel K. Podolsky M.D. & Andrew L. Warshaw M.D.

  2. Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Marc D. Silverstein M.D., James M. Richter M.D., Daniel K. Podolsky M.D. & Andrew L. Warshaw M.D.

Authors
  1. Marc D. Silverstein M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James M. Richter M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel K. Podolsky M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew L. Warshaw M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dr. Silverstein was supported as a Henry J. Kaiser Fellow in General Internal Medicine and is now with the Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverstein, M.D., Richter, J.M., Podolsky, D.K. et al. Suspected pancreatic cancer presenting as pain or weight loss: Analysis of diagnostic strategies. World J. Surg. 8, 839–845 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01656023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01656023

Keywords

  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Optimal Strategy
  • Clinical Decision
  • Needle Aspiration
  • Decision Analysis