Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of bile duct injuries and strictures following cholecystectomy

  • Original Scientific Reports
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During 7057 conventional cholecystectomies (1972–1991), 16 bile duct injuries occurred, amounting to a risk of 0.22%. A total of 1022 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed without such a complication since April 1990. In a retrospective study, 64 patients (16 of our patients and 48 referrals) with an injury or stricture due to conventional cholecystectomy were investigated. In 14 of our 16 patients the injury was recognized and immediately repaired with a good long-term result of 93%, including one successful repair of a subsequent stricture. Two cases of unrecognized injury were managed by nonoperative means. The group of 48 referred patients comprised 10 early postoperative complications (21%) and 38 strictures after an “uneventful” cholecystectomy. Of the 64 total patients, 10 (16%) underwent nonoperative treatment, and 54 required surgery. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 7.4 ±4.9 years. Most cases (93%) were repaired by bilioenteric anastomosis (i.e., foremost hepaticojejunostomy) with an 18% restricture rate. Including second and third repairs for restricture, a total of 60 operations (14 primary and 46 secondary reconstructions) were performed without hospital mortality. A good long-term result after stricture repair was achieved in 75% of the patients, whereas 17% had a poor outcome owing to restricture or death (10% had related mortality within 10 years). The other 8% had a moderate result due to recurrent cholangitis. Thus immediate repair of a bile duct injury offers the better chance of a favorable prognosis compared to secondary stricture repair.

Résumé

Parmi 7057 cholécystectomies traditionnelles réalisées entre 1972 et 1991, on a enregistré 16 lésions de la voie biliaire principale, ce qui représente un risque de 0.22%. Depuis le mois d'avril 1990, on a réalisé 1022 cholécystectomies sous coelioscopie, sans observer un seul de ces accidents. Nous avons analysé rétrospectivement les dossiers de 64 patients ayant une lésion ou une sténose secondaire à une cholécystectomie traditionnelle. Chez 14 de ces 16 observations personnelles, la lésion a été reconnue pendant l'intervention et a été réparée immédiatement avec un résultat à long terme satisfaisant chez 93% de ces patients; un de ces patients a dû être opéré deux fois. Chez deux patients ayant une lésion non reconnue pendant l'intervention, le traitement a été conservateur. Parmi les 48 patients vus en seconde main, il y avait 10 patients ayant une lésion récente, apparue dans les suites immédiates d'une intervention (21%) et 38 sténoses apparues dans les suites d'une cholécystectomie “non compliquée”. Seulement 10 patients (16%) ont été traités de facon conservatrice alors que 54 patients ont nécessité une réparation chirurgicale. Le suivi moyen a été de 7.4 ±4.9 ans. La plupart des cas (93%) ont été réparés par une anastomose bilio-intestinale, le plus souvent des anastomoses hépatico-jéjunales, avec un taux de resténose de 18%. En incluant les réparations secondaires et tertiaires, un total de 60 interventions (14 reconstructions primitives et 46 reconstructions secondaires) ont été pratiquées, sans aucune mortalité. Les résultats à long terme après réparation biliaire étaient considérés comme des succès chez 75% des patients, alors que 17% des patients ont eu des suites compliquées de resténose ou mort (10% de mortalité en 10 ans). Ainsi, la réparation immédiate des lésions de la voie biliaire offre un bien meilleur pronostic que les réparations secondaires.

Resumen

Se presentaron 16 lesiones de la vía biliar en 7.057 colecistectomías (1972–1991), lo cual significa un riesgo de 0.22%. Desde Abril de 1990 se han practicado 1.022 colecistectomías laparoscópicas sin que se haya prsentado tal complicación.

En un estudio retrospectivo se estudiaron 64 pacientes con lesión o estenosis debido a colecistectomía convencional. En 14 de 16 la lesión fue reconocida y reparada inmediatamente con un buen resultado a largo plazo en 93%, incluyendo una exitosa reparación de una estrechez subsiguiente. Dos casos propios de lesión no reconocida fueron manejados por medios no operatorios. El grupo de 48 pacientes referidos estuvo conformado por 10 casos de complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas (21%) y 38 estrecheces luego de colecistectomía hecha “sin complicaciones”. Diez pacientes (16%) fueron tratados por medios no operatorios y 54 requirieron cirugía. El promedio de seguimiento después de la cirugía fue de 7.4 ±4.9 años. La mayoría de los casos (93%) fueron reparados mediante anastomosis bilioentérica, principalmente hepaticoyeyunostomía con una tasa de reestenosis de 18%. Incluyendo segundas y terceras reparaciones por estenosis, se realizaron 60 operaciones (14 reconstrucciones primarias y 46 secundarias) sin mortalidad hospitalaria. Se logró un buen resultado a largo plazo en 75% de los pacientes con reparaciones por estenosis y 17 pacientes exhibieron mal resultado, a juzgar por reestenosis o por muerte (10% mortalidad en 10 años). Por lo tanto, aparece obvio que la reparación inmediata de una lesión de la vía biliar ofrece la mejor oportunidad de un pronóstico favorable en comparación con la reparación secundaria de una estrechez.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyers, W.C.: The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholécystectomies. N. Engl. J. Med.324:073, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bismuth, H.: Postoperative strictures of the bile duct. In: The Biliary Tract. Clinical Surgery International, Vol. 5, L.H. Blumgart, editor. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1982, pp. 209–218

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hepp, J.: Hepaticojejunostomy using the left biliary trunk for iatrogenic biliary lesions: the French connection. World J. Surg.9:507, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  4. Browder, W., Dowling, J.B., Koontz, K.K., Litwin, M.S.: Early management of operative injuries of the extrahepatic biliary tract. Ann. Surg.205:649, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andren-Sandberg, A., Johansson, S., Bengmark, S.: Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. II. Results and treatment. Ann. Surg.201:452, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blumgart, L.H.: Benign biliary strictures. In: Surgery of the Liver and Biliary Tract, L.H. Blumgart, editor. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1988, pp. 721–752

    Google Scholar 

  7. Csendes, A., Diaz, J.C., Burdiles, P., Maluenda, F.: Late results of immediate primary end to end repair in accidental section of the common bile duct. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.168:125, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  8. Czerniak, A., Thompson, J.N., Soreide, O., Benjamin, I.S., Blumgart, L.H.: The management of fistulas of the biliary tract after injury to the bile duct during cholecystectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.167:33, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufman, S.L., Kadir, S., Mitchell, S.E., et al.: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for bile leaks and fistulas. A.J.R.144:1055, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Sonnenberg, E., Casola, G., Wittich, G.R., et al.: The role of interventional radiology for complications of cholecystectomy. Surgery107:632, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sauerbruch, T., Weinzierl, M., Holl, J., Pratschke, E.: Treatment of postoperative bile fistulas by internal endoscopic biliary drainage. Gastroenterology90:1998, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. Longmire, W.P., Tompkins, R.K.: Lesions of the segmental and lobar hepatic ducts. Ann. Surg.182:478, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hadjis, N.S., Blumgart, L.H.: Injury to segmental bile ducts. Arch. Surg.123:351, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  14. ReMine, S.G., Braasch, J.W., Rossi, R.L.: Unilateral hepatic duct obstruction. Am. J. Surg.153:86, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pellegrini, C.A., Thomas, M.J., Way, L.W.: Recurrent biliary stricture—patterns of recurrence and outcome of surgical therapy. Am. J. Surg.147:175, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pitt, H.A., Miyamoto, T., Parapatis, S.K., Thompkins, R.K., Longmire, W.P.: Factors influencing outcome in patients with postoperative biliary strictures. Am. J. Surg.144:14, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huibregtse, K., Katon, R.M., Tytgat, G.N.J.: Endoscopic treatment of postoperative biliary strictures. Endoscopy18:133, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berkelhammer, C., Kortan, P., Haber, G.B.: Endoscopic biliary prostheses as treatment for benign postoperative bile duct strictures. Gastrointest. Endosc.35:95, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams, H.J., Bender, C.E., May, G.R.: Benign postoperative biliary strictures: dilation with fluoroscopic guidance. Radiology163:629, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rossi, P., Salvatori, F.M., Bezzi, M., Maccioni, F., Porcaro, M.L., Ricci, P.: Percutaneous management of benign biliary strictures with balloon dilation and self-expending metallic stents. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol.13:231, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pitt, H.A., Kaufman, S.L., Coleman, J., White, R.I., Cameron, J.L.: Benign postoperative biliary strictures—operate or dilate? Ann. Surg.210:417, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terblanche, J., Worthley, C.S., Spence, R.A.J., Krige, J.E.: High or low hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct strictures? Surgery108: 828, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barker, E.M., Winkler, M.: Permanent-access hepaticojejunostomy. Br. J. Surg.71:188, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  24. Russell, E., Yrizarry, J.M., Huber, J.S., et al.: Percutaneous transjejunal biliary dilatation: alternate management for benign strictures. Radiology159:209, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  25. Genest, J.F., Nanos, E., Grundfest-Broniatowski, S., Vogt, D., Hermann, R.E.: Benign biliary strictures: an analytic review (1970 to 1984). Surgery99:409, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moossa, A.R., Mayer, A.D., Stabile, B.: Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct. Arch. Surg.125:1028, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  27. Warren, K.W., Jefferson, M.F.: Prevention and repair of strictures of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Surg. Clin. North Am.53:1169, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  28. Davidoff, A.M., Pappas, T.N., Murray, E.A., et al.: Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg.215:196, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moossa, A.R., Easter, D.W., van Sonnenberg, E., Casola, G., D'Ágostino, H.: Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. Ann. Surg.215:203, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cheslyn-Curtis, S., Emberton, M., Ahmed, H., Williamson, R.C.N., Habib, N.A.: Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg.79:231, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lepsien, G., Lüdtke, F.E., Neufang, T., Schafmayer, A., Peiper, H.J.: Treatment of iatrogenic common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the laparoscopic insertion of a T-tube stent. Surg. Endosc.5:119, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raute, M., Podlech, P., Jaschke, W. et al. Management of bile duct injuries and strictures following cholecystectomy. World J. Surg. 17, 553–562 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655124

Keywords

Navigation