Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A rational approach to antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antibiotic prophylaxis should be used a) where the risk of infection is high; b) where bacterial contamination is high; where contamination is infrequent but the consequences of infection are high; and c) where contamination is infrequent but the host is compromised. Careful attention should be given the selection of an appropriate agent for the given circumstance. Timing and route of administration are also important factors.

Résumé

L'antibiothérapie à titre prophylactique est indispensable alors que le risque de contamination est faible mais que les conséquences de l'infection sont importantes. Une attention particulière doit être accordée aux choix de l'antibiotique en fonction des circonstances données. Le moment et la voie d'administration doivent êgalement être pris en considération.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burke, J.F.: The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery50:161, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stone, H.H., Hooper, C.A., Kolb, L.B., Geheber, C.E., Dawkins, E.J.: Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary and colonic surgery. Ann. Surg. 184:443, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  3. Downing, R., McLeish, A.R., Burdon, D.W., Alexander-Williams, J., Keighley, M.R.B.: Duration of systemic prophylactic antibiotic cover against anaerobic sepsis in intestinal surgery. Dis. Colon Rectum20:401, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  4. Strachan, C.J.L., Black, J., Powis, S.J.A., Waterworth, T.A., Wise, R., Wilkinson, A.R., Burdon, D.W., Stevern, M., Mitra, B., Norcott, H.: Prophylactic use of cephazolin against wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. Br. Med. J.1:1254, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evans, C., Pollock, A.V., Rosenberg, I.L.: The reduction of surgical wound infection by prophylactic parenteral cephaloridine. Br. J. Surg.61:133, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nichols, R.L., Condon, R.E., Gorbach, S.L., Nyhus, L.: Efficacy of preoperative antimicrobial preparation of the bowel. Ann. Surg.172:257, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arabi, Y., Dimock, F., Burdon, D.W., AlexanderWilliams, J., Keighley, M.R.B.: Influence of bowel preparation and antimicrobials on colonic microflora. Br. J. Surg.65:555, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keighley, M.R.B., Arabi, Y., Alexander-Williams, J., Youngs, D., Burdon, D.W.: Comparison between systemic and oral antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Lancet1:894, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  9. Finch, D.R.A., Taylor, L., Morris, P.J.: Wound sepsis following gastro-intestinal surgery: A comparison of topical and two-dose systemic cephradine. Br. J. Surg.66:580, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gatehouse, D., Dimock, F., Burdon, D.W., Alexander-Williams, J., Keighley, M.R.B.: Prediction of wound sepsis following gastric operations. Br. J. Surg.65:551, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keighley, M.R.B.: Micro organisms in the bile. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl.59:328, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bivens, M., Neufeld, J., McCarth, W.D.: The prophylactic use of Keflex and Keflin in vaginal hyster-ectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.122:169, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weightman, J.A.K.: A prospective survey of the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications. Br. J. Surg.55:86, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cruse, P.J.E., Foord, R.: A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch. Surg.107:206, 1973

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keighley, M.R.B. A rational approach to antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. World J. Surg. 6, 327–329 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653549

Keywords

Navigation