Skip to main content

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in urology and transplantation

Abstract

The main source of infection in urological practice is from the presence of an indwelling catheter. The risk of catheteracquired infection is determined by the duration of catheterization, the adequacy of free drainage, and the efficiency of the closed drainage system. Many catheter-acquired infections are due to multiresistant strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp.,Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus sp., and Providentia sp. Antibiotic prophylaxis has no place in the prevention of catheter-acquired infections, and prophylaxis should be achieved by scrupulous aseptic technique and reducing the duration of drainage. The problems of catheters in the paraplegic are discussed. Septicemia and endotoxemia are the most feared complications of cystoscopy and retropubic prostatectomy if the urinary tract is infected and of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. For this reason, antibiotic cover is generally advised for these procedures.

Sepsis is still a major cause of death in patients who have received a renal transplant. These infections are not only bacterial, but viral, protozoal, and fungal. The severity and frequency of these infections have been reduced by less aggressive immunosuppression. There is probably a place for perioperative antibiotic cover, but long-term antibiotics should be avoided.

Résumé

Le principale cause de l'infection en chirurgie urologique est représentée par la présence d'un cathéter. Le risque d'infection est alors fonction de la durée de son maintien de l'efficacité du drainage et du caractère hermétique de l'appareil collecteur des urines. L'infection urinaire acquise est due à des germes résistants escherichia coli, klebsiella, pseudomonas, proteus et providentia. L'antibiothérapie prophylactique n'a pas de place pour prévenir l'infection urinaire acquise par la voie d'un cathéter. La prévention de l'infection est obtenue en observant rigoureusement les règles de l'asepsie et en réduisant la durée du sondage urinaire.

Le problème de la sonde urinaire chez les paraplégiques est envisagé dans l'article.

Lorsque l'appareil urinaire est le siège d'une infection la septicémie et l'endotoxémie sont des complications à redouter au décours de la cystoscopie ou de la prostectomie rétro-pubienne. Il en est de même après biopsie prostatique par voie transrectale. Il est donc avisé d'assurer une protection antibiotique systématique lors de ces interventions.

Chez les transplantés rénaux l'infection reste une cause majeure de mortalité. L'infection est non seulement de type bactérien mais aussi de type viral ou mycosique. Sa gravité s'est réduite avec la réduction de l'immuno suppression. L'antibiothérapie d'encadrement opératoire a certainement sa place alors que l'emploi prolongé des antibiotiques doit être évité.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Weil, M.H., Spink, W.W.: The shock syndrome associated with bacteraemia due to gram-negative bacilli. Arch. Intern. Med.101:184, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chisolm, G.D.: Urinary Tract Infections and Drug Distribution Studies. In Hospital Acquired Infections in Surgery, H.C. Polk, H.H. Stone, editors, Baltimore, University Park Press, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilksch, J., Vernon-Roberts, B., Garrett, R., Smith, K.: The role of catheter surface morphology and extractable cytotoxic material in tissue reactions to urethral catheters. Br. J. Urol. (in press)

  4. Bruce, A.W., Clark, A.F.: The problem of catheter encrustation. Can. Med. J.3:238, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brocklehurst, J.C., Brocklehurst, S.: The management of indwelling catheters. Br. J. Urol.50:102, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kass, E.G., Schneiderman, L.J.: Entry of bacteria into urinary tracts of patients with inlying catheters. N. Engl. J. Med.256:556, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kunin, C.M., McCormack, R.C.: Prevention of catheter-induced urinary tract infections by sterile closed drainage. N. Engl. J. Med.274:1155, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  8. Viont, A.L., Linton, K.B., Gillespie, W.A.: Improved method for preventing movement of the indwelling catheter in female patients. Lancet1:736, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wickham, J.E.A.: Stones: Surgical management. In Tutorials in Postgraduate Medicine: Urology, G.D. Chisolm, editor, London, Heinemann, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCoy, R.W., Rhamy, R.K.: Heal conduits in children. J. Urol.103:491, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt, J.D., Hawtrey, C.E., Flocks, R.H., Culp, D.A.: Complications, results and problems of ileal conduit diversion. J. Urol.109:210, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guinan, P.D., Moore, R.H., Weter, E., Murphy, G.P.: The bacteriology of ileal conduit urine in man. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.134:78, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bergman, B.: Studies in patients with ileal conduit diversion with special regard to renal infection. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. (Suppl.)47:1, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  14. O'Grady, F.: Initiation and ascent of urinary tract infection. In Scientific Foundations of Urology, Vol. I, D.I. Williams, G.D. Chisholm, editors, London, Heinemann, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blandy, J.P.: One-stage and two-stage urethroplasty. In Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, J.A. Libertino, L. Zinman, editors, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaches, C.G.C., Ashken, M.H., Dunn, M., Hammonds, J.C., Jenkins, I.L., Smith, P.J.B.: The role of selective internal urethrotomy in the management of urethral stricture: A multicentre evaluation. Br. J. Urol.51:579, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson, M.R.G., Cross, R.J., Shetty, M.B., Fittall, B.: Bacteriaemia and bacteriogenic shock in a district hospital urological practice. Br. J. Urol.52:10, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, J.D., Howards, A.J.: The use of antibiotics in urology. In Recent Advances in Urology/Andrology, No. 3, Section 6, W.F. Hendry, editor, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts, J.B.M., Linton, K.B., Pollard, B.R., Mitchell, J.P., Gillespie, W.A.: Long-term catheter drainage in the male. Br. J. Urol.37:63, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walter, S., Vejlsgaard, R.: Diagnostic catheterisation and bacteriuria in women with urinary incontinence. Br. J. Urol.50:106, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, A., Linton, K.B., Gillespie, W.A., Slade, N., Mitchell, J.P.: Catheter drainage and infection in acute retention of urine. Lancet1:310, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gillespie, W.A., Lennon, G.G., Linton, K.B., Slade, N.: Prevention of urinary infection in gynaecology. Br. Med. J.2:523, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jackaman, F.R., Chisholm, G.D.: Urinary infection and prostatectomy. Br. J. Urol.47:545, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  24. Slade, N.: Bacteriaemia and septicaemia after urological operations. Proc. R. Soc. Med.51:331, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mitchell, J.P.: A plastic balloon catheter. Br. Med. J.2:693, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  26. Butler, H.K., Kunin, C.M.: Evaluation of polymixin catheter lubricant and impregnated catheters. J. Urol.100:560, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bastable, J.R.G., Peel, R.N., Birch, D.M., Richards, B.: Continuous irrigation of the bladder after prostatectomy: Its effect on post-prostatectomy infection. Br. J. Urol.49:689, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kirk, D., Dunn, M., Bullock, D.W., Mitchell, J.P., Hobbs, S.J.F.: Hibitane bladder irrigation in the prevention of catheter-associated urinary infection. Br. J. Urol.51:528, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shah, P.J.R., Williams, G., Chaudary, M.: Shortterm antibiotic prophylaxis and prostatectomy. Br. J. Urol.53:339, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harper, W.E.S., Matz, L.R.: The effect of chlorhexidine irrigation of the bladder of the rat. Br. J. Urol.47:539, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harper, W.E.S.: An appraisal of 12 solutions used for bladder irrigation or instillation. Br. J. Urol.53:433, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  32. Merimsky, E., Werbin, N., Canetti, R.: Pre-operative bladder irrigation with povidone-iodine. Br. J. Urol.53:330, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  33. Britt, M.R., Garibaldi, R.A., Miller, W.A., Hebertson, R.M., Burke, J.P.: Antimicrobial prophylaxis for catheter-associated bacteriemia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.2:240, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  34. Butler, H.K., Kunin, C.M.: Evaluation of specific systemic antimicrobial therapy on patients while on closed catheter drainage. J. Urol.100:567, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mitchell, J.P., Slade, N., Linton, K.B.: Instrumental bacteraemia and its prevention. Br. J. Urol.34:454, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  36. Blandy, J.P.: Prostatectomy in 1980s: Logistics and techniques. In Recent Advances in Urology/Andrology, No. 3, Section 14, W.F. Hendry, editor, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marshall, A.: Retropubic prostatectomy: A review with special reference to urinary infection. Br. J. Urol.39:307, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  38. Singh, M., Blandy, J.P., Tresidder, G.C.: The evaluation of trans-urethral resection for benign enlargement of the prostate. Br. J. Urol.45:93, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chodak, G.W., Plaut, M.E.: Systemic antibiotics for prophylaxis in urologic surgery: A critical review. J. Urol.121:695, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morris, M.J., Golovsky, D., Guiness, M.D.G., Mather, P.: The value of prophylactic antibiotics in transurethral prostate resection: A controlled trial, with observations on the origin of postoperative infection. Br. J. Urol.48:479, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  41. Williams, M., Hole, D.J., Murdoch, R.W.G., Ogden, A.C., Hargreave, T.B.: 48-hour cephradine and post-prostatectomy bacteriaemia. Br. J. Urol.52:311, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hargreave, T.B., Hindmarsh, J.R., Elton, R., Chisholm, G.D., Gould, J.C.: Short-term cefotaxime pro-phylaxis for prostatic surgery, (in press)

  43. Bannister, G., Arkell, D.G., Menday, A.P.: Prostatectomy and prophylaxis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.7:209, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nielsen, O.S., Maigaard, S., Frimodt-Møller, N., Madsen, P.O.: Prophylactic antibiotics in transurethral prostatectomy. J. Urol.126:60, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  45. Astraldi, A.: Diagnosis of cancer of the prostate: Biopsy by rectal route. Urol. Cutan. Rev.41:421, 1937

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fawcett, D.P., Eykyn, S., Bultitude, M.J.: Urinary tract infection following transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Br. J. Urol.47:679, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bissada, N.K., Rountree, G.A., Gulieman, J.S.: Factors affecting accuracy and morbidity in transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.145:869, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  48. Davidson, P., Melament, M.: Urinary contamination as a result of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. J. Urol.105:545, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  49. Turner, B.I., Warner, J.T., Rhamy, R.K.: Prostate needle examination: Current clinical concepts. South. Med. J.73:813, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ruebush, T.K., McConville, J.H., Calia, F.M.: A double-blind study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxozole prophylaxis in patients having transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. J. Urol.122:492, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brown, R.W., Warner, J.J., Turner, B.I., Harris, L.F., Alford, R.H.: Bacteremia and bacteriuria after transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology18:145, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chisholm, G.D.: Nephrostomy. In Urologic Surgery, 3rd Edition, J.F. Glenn, editor

  53. Moisey, C.U., Rees, R.N.M.: Results of transurethral resection of prostate in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Br. J. Urol. 50:539, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lum, S.K., Marshall, V.R.: Results of prostatectomy in patients following a cerebrovascular accident. Br. J. Urol. (in press)

  55. Bunts, R.C.: Preservation of renal function in the paraplegic. J. Urol.81:720, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  56. O'Flynn, J.D.: Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury. Management of patients in Dublin, Ireland. Urol. Clin. North Am.1:155, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hackler, R.H.: A 25-year perspective mortality study in the spinal cord injured patient: Comparison with the long-term living paraplegic. J. Urol.117:486, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  58. Guttman, L., Frankel, H.: The value of intermittent catheterization in the early management of traumatic paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia4:63, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  59. Herr, H.W.: Intermittent catheterization in neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J. Urol.113:477, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pearman, J.W.: Urological follow-up of 99 spinal cord injury patients initially managed by intermittent catheterisation. Br. J. Urol.48:297, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pearman, J.W., England, E.J.: The Urological Management of the Patient Following Spinal Cord Injury. Springfield, Ill., Charles C Thomas, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  62. Boyarsky, S., Labay, P., Hanick, P., Abramson, A.S., Boyarsky, R.: Care of the Patient with Neuro-genic Bladder. Boston, Little, Brown and Co., 1979

    Google Scholar 

  63. Graham, S.D.: Present urological treatment of spinal cord injury patients. J. Urol.126:1, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lapides, J., Dickno, A.C., Lowe, B.S., Kalish, M.D.: Follow-up on unsterile intermittent self-catheterization. J. Urol.111:184, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rhame, F.S., Perkash, I.: Urinary tract infections occurring in recent spinal cord injury patients on intermittent catheterization. J. Urol.122:669, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sapico, F.L., Jiminez, E.M., Lindquist, L.B., Morrow, J.W., Montgomerie, J.Z.: Short course aminoglycoside therapy in patients with spinal cord injury: Standard dose versus low dose. Urology15:457, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rifkind, D., Marchioro, T.L., Waddell, W.R., Starzl, T.E.: Infectious diseases associated with renal homo-transplantation. I. Incidence, types and predisposing factors. J.A.M.A.189:397, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hill, R.B., Dahrling, B.E., Starzl, T.E., Rifkind, D.: Death after transplantation—an analysis of 60 cases. Am. J. Med.42:327, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  69. Moore, T.C., Hume, D.M.: The period and nature of hazard in clinical renal transplantation. I. The hazard to patient survival. Ann. Surg.170:1, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pletka, P., Cohen, S.L., Hulme, B., Kenyon, J.R., Owen, K., Thompson, A.E., Snell, M., Mowbray, J.F., Porter, K.A., Leigh, D.A., Peart, W.S.: Cadaveric renal transplantation. An analysis of 65 cases. Lancet1:1, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  71. Barnes, B.A., Bergan, J.J., Braun, W.E., Kayhoe, D.E., Kountz, S.L., Merkel, F.K., Mickey, M.R., Rubin, A.L., Simmons, R.L., Stevens, L.E., Wilson, R.E.: The tenth report of the human renal transplant registry. J.A.M.A.221:1495, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  72. Evans, D.B.: Infectious complications of transplantation surgery. Proc. R. Soc. Med.62:597, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tilney, N.L., Strom, T.B., Vineyard, G.C., Merrill, J.P.: Factors contributing to the declining mortality rate in renal transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med.299:1321, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  74. McGeown, M.G., Kennedy, J.A., Loughridge, W.G.G.: One hundred kidney transplants in the Belfast City Hospital. Lancet2:648, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  75. Chisholm, G.D.: Complications of renal transplantation. Proc. R. Soc. Med.66:914, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  76. McCoy, G.C., Loening, S., Braun, W.E., Magnusson, M.O., Banowsky, L.H., McHenry, M.C.: The fate of cadaver renal allografts contaminated before transplantation. Transplantation20:467, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  77. Winnearls, C.G., Lane, D.J., Warrell, M.J.: Infectious complications after renal transplantation. In Kidney Transplantation, P.J. Morris, editor, London, Academic Press, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  78. Sussman, M., Russell, R.B.: Infection after cadaveric renal transplantation. Proc. R. Soc. Med.65:471, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  79. Krieger, J.N., Brem, A.S., Kaplan, M.R.: Urinary tract infection in pediatric renal transplantation. Urology15:362, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  80. Griffin, P.J.A., Salaman, J.R.: Urinary tract infections after renal transplantation: Do they matter? Br. Med. J.1:710, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hamshere, R.J., Chisholm, G.D., Shackman, R.: Late urinary tract infection after renal transplantation. Lancet2:793, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  82. Appel, G.B., Neu, H.C.: The nephrotoxicity of antimicrobial agents (First of three parts). N. Engl. J. Med.296:663, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lant, A.F.: Renal excretion and toxicity of drugs. In Renal Disease, 4th Edition, D.A.K. Black, N.F. Jones, editors, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publishers, 1978, pp. 617–639

    Google Scholar 

  84. McHenry, M.C., Braun, W.E., Popowniak, K.L., Banowsky, L.H., Deodhar, S.D.: Septicemia in renal transplant recipients. Urol. Clin. North Am.3:647, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  85. Novick, A.C., Braun, W.E., Magnusson, M., Stowe, N.: Current status of renal transplantation at the Cleveland Clinic. J. Urol.122:433, 1979

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chisholm, G.D. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in urology and transplantation. World J. Surg. 6, 281–292 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653543

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653543

Keywords

  • Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
  • Indwell Catheter
  • Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
  • Aseptic Technique