Skip to main content
Log in

Concordance between classifications of the Ciconiidae based on behavioral and morphological data

Klassifikation der Ciconiidae nach ethologischen und morphologischen Daten

  • Published:
Journal für Ornithologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Kahl's data on courtship behavior in the Ciconiidae were recoded and analyzed from a phenetic viewpoint. The results reflect his published classification except for the placement ofCiconia nigra and the generaJabiru andEphippiorhynchus. Similarities based on skeletal morphology are highly congruent with those recalculated from the behavioral data. The classification suggested by both sets of data is similar to that proposed byKahl with the following changes: (1)Jabiru is included withEphippiorhynchus; (2)Ephippiorhynchus is transferred into the Ciconiini.

Zusammenfassung

Die DatenKahls über das Sexualverhalten der Ciconiidae wurden nach äußeren Merkmalen codiert und analysiert. Die Ergebnisse spiegeln seine publizierte Klassifikation wider, mit Ausnahme der Stellung vonCiconia nigra und der GeneraJabiru undEphippiorhynchus. Ähnlichkeiten der Skelettmorphologie stimmen mit dem Vergleich der Verhaltensdaten in hohem Maße überein. Die auf der Grundlage von beiden Datensätzen sich abzeichnende Klassifikation ist jener vonKahl sehr ähnlich mit Ausnahme der folgenden Änderungen:Jabiru ist mitEphippiorhynchus zusammenzufassen;Ephippiorhynchus wird in die Ciconiini eingegliedert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Atchley, W. R. (1978): Ratios, regression intercepts, and the scaling of data. Syst. Zool. 27: 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, M. P. (1966): Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 1. The Marabou Stork,Leptoptilos crumeniferus (Lesson). Behavior 27: 76–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1971): Social behavior and taxonomic relationships of the storks. Living Bird 10: 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1972 a): A revision of the family Ciconiidae (Aves). J. Zool. 167: 451–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1972 b): Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 2. The adjutant storks,Leptoptilos dubius (Gmelin) andL. javanicus (Horsfield). Ardea 60: 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1972 c): Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. The woodstorks (generaMycteria andIbis). Ibis 114: 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1972 d): Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 4. The „typical“ storks (generaCiconia, Sphenorhynchus, Dissoura, andEuxenura). Z. Tierpsychol. 30: 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1972 e): Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 5. The openbill storks (genusAnastomus). J. Orn. 113: 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1973): Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 6. The Blacknecked, Saddlebill, and Jabiru storks (generaXenorhynchus, Ephippiorhynchus, andJabiru). Condor 75: 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1979): Family Ciconiidae. Pp 245–252,in Check-list of birds of the world (E. Mayr &G. W. Cottrell, eds.), Mus. Comp. Zool., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2nd ed., vol 1: xvii + 1–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. C., &F. J. Rohlf (1974): Functionplane — A new approach to simple structure rotation. Psychometrika 39: 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S. L. (1978): Multiple origins of the Ciconiiformes. Proc. Colonial Waterbird Group 1978: 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, K. C. (1978): A review of the classification of the Ciconiiformes.In A. Sprunt, J. C. Ogden, &S. Winckler, eds. Wading birds. Natl. Audubon Soc. Res. Rep. no. 7: 7–15.

  • Peters, J. L. (1931): Check-list of birds of the world. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. vol. 1: xviii + 1–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. (1970): Linear adaptive hierarchical clustering schemes. Syst. Zool. 19: 58–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1981): Consensus indices for comparing classifications. Math. Biosci. 59: 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto &R. R. Sokal (1981): Comparing numerical taxonomic studies. Syst. Zool. 30: 459–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H. A., &R. R. Sokal (1973): Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco. 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen, R. (1959): Contribution à l'anatomie et à la systematique de base des Ciconiiformes (Parker 1868). Bull. Inst. Roy Soc. Natur. Belg. 35: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore, A. (1960): A classification for the birds of the world. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 139: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. S. (1982): A phenetic assessment of the Ciconiidae (Aves) using skeletal morphology. Unpubl. Ph. D. Diss., Univ. Oklahoma, Norman.

  • Ditto (1983 a): Phenetic relationships within the Ciconiidae (Aves). Ann. Carnegie Mus. 52: 79–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1983 b): Character transformations in phenetic studies using continuous morphometric variables. Syst. Zool. 32: 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, D.S. Concordance between classifications of the Ciconiidae based on behavioral and morphological data. J Ornithol 125, 25–37 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01652936

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01652936

Keywords

Navigation