Skip to main content
Log in

Limiting the role of the family in discontinuation of life sustaining treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In matters of discontinuation of life-sustaining treatment, traditional role of the family to speak on behalf of the incompetent patient is questionable. We explore the reasons why physicians perceive patient autonomy to be transferrable to family members. Principle of patient autonomy may not suffice when futile treatment is demanded and may serve to erode the ethical integrity of medical profession. An enhanced role for bioethics committees is proposed when physicians propose to discontinue life-sustaining treatment against the wishes of the patient or their families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramsey, P. (1978).In the matter of Quinlan-Ethics at Edges of Life. New Haven: EL University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Tocqueville, A. (1945).Democracy in America. A. Knopf.

  3. Berrigan, D. (1973).We die before we live-Talking with the very ill. New York: The Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miles, S. (1983). Paternalism, family duties and My Aunt Maude.Journal American Medical Association, 250, 2011–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kass, L. R. (1980). Ethical dilemmas in the care of the ill: What is the physician's service?Journal American Medical Association, 244, 1811–1818.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clements, C. D., & Sider, R. (1983). Medical ethics assault upon medical values.Journal American Medical Association, 250, 2011–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brennan, T. A. (1986). Do not resuscitate orders for the incompetent patient in absence of family consent.Law and Health Care, 14, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blackhall, L. J. (1987). Must we always use CPR?New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1281–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, B., Callahan, D., & Caplan, A. L. (1988). Ethical challenges of chronic illness.Hastings Center Report, Feb–Mar.

  10. President's Commission for the study of ethical problems in medicine and biomedical and behavior research. (1983).Deciding to forego life sustaining treatment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Veatch, R. M. (1986). Defining the family's role in treatment decisions.Health Progress, October, 50–52.

  12. Weil, M. H., Weil, C. J., & Rackow, E. C. (1988). Guide to ethical decision-making for the critically ill: The three R's and Q.C.Critical Care Medicine, 16, 636–641.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wikler, D. (1988). Not dead, not dying? Ethical categories and persistent vegetative state.Hastings Center Report, 18, 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kyff, J., Puri, V. K., Raheja, R., & Ireland, T. (1987). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalized patients: Continuing problems of decision-making.Critical Care Medicine, 15, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Callahan, D. (1987)Setting Limits-Medical goals in aging society. New York: Simon and Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jonsen, A. R., Sigler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (1982).Clinical Ethics. New York: McMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tomlinson, R., & Brody, H. (1987). Ethics and communication in Do Not Resuscitate Orders.New England Journal Medicine, 318, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying (1987). Indiana University Press: The Hastings Center.

  19. Brody, B. A. (1988). Ethical questions raised by the persistent vegetative patient.Hastings Center Report, 18, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cassel, E. J. (1986). Autonomy in the intensive care unit: The refusal of treatment.Critical Care Clinics, 2, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brennan, T. A. (1988). Ethics committees and decisions to limit care. The experience at Massachusetts General Hospital.Journal American Medical Association, 260, 803–807.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lo, B. (1987). Behind closed doors: Promises and pitfalls of ethics committees.New England Journal Medicine, 317, 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sundram, C. J. (1988). Informed consent for major medical treatment of mentally disabled people-A new approach.New England Journal Medicine, 318, 1368–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puri, V.K., Weber, L.J. Limiting the role of the family in discontinuation of life sustaining treatment. J Med Hum 11, 91–98 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650689

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650689

Keywords

Navigation