Summary
-
1.
Polymers I–IV behave much as do metal acetylides.
-
2.
The photocurrent decays only slowly at the end of illumination.
-
3.
The increase in response from I to IV is to be ascribed to the differences in structure.
-
4.
The marked fall in 1p at low intensities is probably due to trap levels, which are [5] ineffective at high intensities.
References
Ya. M. Paushkin, L. S. Polak, A. F. Lunin, and I. I. Patalakh, DAN SSSR,164, no. 5, 113, 1965.
G. V. Gulyaev, B. E. Davydov, B. A. Kventsel, I. I. Patalakh, and L. S. Polak, Transactions of the Second All-Union Conference on Radiation Chemistry [in Russian]. Izd.-vo AN SSSR, 621, 1962.
V. S. Myl'nikov, E. K. Putseiko, and A. N. Terenin, DAN SSSR,149, no. 4, 897, 1963.
V. S. Myl'nikov and A. N. Terenin, DAN SSSR,153, no. 6, 1381, 1963.
V. A. Benderskii, B. Ya. Kogan, Yu. Yu. Abramov, and L. E. Kapranova, DAN SSSR,156, no. 4, 897, 1964.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polak, L.S., Lunin, A.F. & Nechushkin, A.M. Photoelectric response of polymers with -C=N- bonds in the main conjugation chain. Soviet Physics Journal 10, 89–90 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01649494
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01649494