Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anal sphincter function after treatment of fissure-in-ano by lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation

A randomized study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty patients with chronic anal fissure were randomized into two groups. Ten patients were treated with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy and 10 with anal dilatation. Anal dilatation was carried out preoperatively, and at 1 and 3 months after the operation in all patients. Preoperatively there was a significantly increased maximal resting pressure in the 20 fissure patients (80 mmHg median) compared with 20 control subjects (50 mmHg median). Postoperatively a significant decrease in pressure occurred in the dilated group (49 mmHg medianp<0.05), whereas the pressure was not significantly reduced in the group that underwent sphincterotomy (65 mmHg medianp<0.05). At 1 year three patients complained of recurrent symptoms of anal fissure in the dilated group compared with one in the sphincterotomy group. Minor continence disturbance was noted in two patients in both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Notaras MJ (1971) The treatment of anal fissure by lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy —technique and results. Br J Surg 58:96–98

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen SL, Lund F, Nielsen OV, Tange G (1984) Lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation in the treatment of fissure in ano in outpatients: a prospective randomized study. Br Med J 289:528–530

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collopy MB, Ryan P (1979U Comparision of lateral subcutaneous sphinterotomy with anal dilatation in the treatment of fissure in ano. Med J Aust II:461–462

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hancock BD (1977) The internal sphincter and anal fissure. Br Med J 64:92

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marby M, Alexander-Williams J, Buchmann P, Arabi Y, Kappas A, Minnervini S, Gatehouse D, Keighley MR (1979) A randomized controlled trial to compare anal dilatation with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 22:308

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M (1986) Anal manometric evaluation in anal fissure. Acta Chir Scand 153:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abcarian H, Lashmanan S, Read DR, Roccaforte P (1982) The role of the internal sphincter in chronic anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum 25:525–528

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mortensen PE, Olsen J, Pedersen IK, Christiansen J (1987) A randomized study on haemorrhoidectomy combined with anal dilatation. Dis Colon Rectum 30 (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsen, J., Mortensen, P.E., Petersen, I.K. et al. Anal sphincter function after treatment of fissure-in-ano by lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation. Int J Colorect Dis 2, 155–157 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01647999

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01647999

Keywords

Navigation