Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative in vitro activity of cefpodoxime against anaerobes other than bacteroides fragilis

Vergleichende In-vitro-Aktivität von Cefpodoxim gegen andere Anaerobier als Bacteroides fragilis

  • Special Addendum
  • In Vitro Evaluation Of Cefpodoxime, A New Oral Cephalosporin Of The Third Generation
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To assess thein vitro activity of cefpodoxime against anaerobic respiratory tract and oropharyngeal pathogens 77 strains belonging to 18 gram-negative and 7 gram-positive species were studied by means of agar dilution tests. For comparison cefuroxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid and clindamycin were also tested. Cefpodoxime was found to be active at concentrations of ≤ 0.125 mg/l againstPrevotella oralis, Prevotella buccalis, Prevotella bivia, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, Bacteroides corporis, Bacteroides gracilis, Fusobacterium necrophorum, Fusobacterium naviforme andPropionibacterium acnes. Prevotella oris, Prevotella buccae, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Peptostreptococcus asacharolyticus, andRuminococcus bromii were inhibited at concentrations of ≤ 1 mg/l andPrevotella denticola, Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides pneumosintes, andPeptostreptococcus micros at concentrations of ≤ 4 mg/l. Strains ofVeillonella parvula were inhibited by cefpodoxime at 0.25 – 8 mg/l, and single strains ofPeptostreptococcus anaerobius andPetostreptococcus magnus showed MICs of 32 and 64 mg/l, respectively. The results obtained warrant the use of cefpodoxime in therapy of anaerobic and mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections of the upper and lower respiratory tract and similar infections not involvingBacteroides fragilis.

Zusammenfassung

Zur Einschätzung derIn-vitro-Aktivität von Cefpodoxim gegen Anaerobier aus dem Respirationstrakt und dem Orophyarynx wurden 77 Stämme von 18 gramnegativen und 7 grampositiven Species mit der Agardilutionstechnik untersucht. Als Vergleichssubstanzen dienten Cefuroxim, Amoxicillin, Amoxicillin + Clavulansäure und Clindamycin. Bei Konzentrationen ≤ 0,125 mg/l war Cefpodoxim wirksam gegenPrevotella oralis, Prevotella buccalis, Prevotella bivia, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, Bacteroides corporis, Bacteroides gracilis, Fusobacterium necrophorum, Fusobacterium naviforme undPropionibacterium acnes. Prevotella oris, Prevotella buccae, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus undRuminococcus bromii wurden bei Konzentrationen von ≤ 1 mg/l gehemmt, undPrevotella denticula, Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides pneumosintes undPeptostreptococcus micros bei Konzentrationen von ≤ 4 mg/l. Stämme vonVeillonella parvula wurden durch Cefpodoxim bei Konzentrationen von 0,25 – 8 mg/l gehemmt, und einzelne Stämme vonPetostreptococcus anaerobius undPeptostreptococcus magnus zeigten MHKs von 32 bzw. 64 mg/l. Diese Ergebnisse lassen den Einsatz von Cefpodoxim zur Therapie von anaeroben und gemischt aerob-anaeroben Infektionen des oberen und unteren Respirationstrakts und von ähnlichen Infektionen als berechtigt erscheinen, soweit nichtBacteroides fragilis beteiligt ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Utsui, Y., Inoue, M., Mitsuhashi, S. In vitro andin vivo antibacterial activities of CS-807, a new oral cephalosporin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1987) 1085–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, R. N., Barry, A. L. Antimicrobial activity and disk diffusion susceptibility testing of U-76,253 A (R-3746), the active metabolite of the new cephalosporin ester, 76,252 (CS-807). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 443–449.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fass, R. J., Helsel, V. L. In vitro activity of U-76,252 (CS-807), a new oral cephalosporin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 1082–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knapp, C. C., Sierra-Madeiro, J., Washington, J. A. Antibacterial activities of cefpodoxime, cefixime, and ceftriaxone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 1896–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Finegold, S. M., George, W. L. (eds.): Anaerobic infections in humans. Academic Press, San Diego 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Werner, H. Anaerobier-Infektionen. Pathogenese, Klinik, Therapie, Diagnostik. Thieme, Stuttgart 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holdeman, L. V., Cato, E. P., Moore, W. E. C. Anaerobe laboratory manual. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Werner, H., Heizmann, W., Luft, G. In vitro activity of flomoxef compared to moxalactam, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and clindamycin against anaerobes. Arzneim. Forsch. 38 (1988) 1553–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, C. C., Reinhardt, J. F., Edelstein, M. A. C., Mulligan, M. E., George, W. L., Finegold, S. M. Bacteroides gracilis, an important anaerobic bacterial pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22 (1985) 799–802.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tanner, A. C. R. Characterization ofWolinella spp.,Campylobacter concisus, Bacteroides gracilis, andEikenella corrodens by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24 (1986) 562–565.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werner, H., Heizmann, W.R. & Höflsauer, M. Comparative in vitro activity of cefpodoxime against anaerobes other than bacteroides fragilis. Infection 19, 377–379 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645372

Keywords

Navigation