Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution in antibiotic susceptibility of bacteroides fragilis group strains in France based on periodic surveys

Resistenzentwicklung bei Stämmen von Bacteroides fragilis in Frankreich. Ergebnis periodischer Kontrollstudien

  • Addendum II
  • The Impact Of Microbiology On Clinical Problem International Symposium Weitenburg/Tübingen, June 1988
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Anaerobic antibiotic susceptibility testing with standardized methods enabled the authors to speculate on the evolution of antibiotic resistance within theBacteroides fragilis group strains. Cefoxitin resistance was stable (0–5%) until 1985 and gradually increased later. Clindamycin resistance emerged in 1980 with a stable 10% resistance rate until 1986. An increase in clindamycin resistance developed in three institutions in 1987 [14]. No change was detected for imipenem and metronidazole, while piperacillin resistance increased since 1986. A comparison of antibiotic resistance rates is discussed for anaerobes in different countries.

Zusammenfassung

Standardisierte Methoden für die anaerobe Empfindlichkeitsprüfung ermöglichen es den Autoren, Vermutungen über die Entwicklung der Antibiotika-Resistenz innerhalb derBacteroides fragilis-Gruppe anzustellen. Die Cefoxitin-Resistenz war bis 1985 stabil (0–5%) und stieg danach langsam an. Die Clindamycin-Resistenz trat erst 1980 auf mit einer stabilen Resistenzrate von 10% bis 1986. Eine Steigerung der Resistenzraten von Clindamycin trat 1987 bei drei Instituten auf [14]. Keine Änderungen konnten für Imipenem und Metronidazol entdeckt werden, während die Piperacillin-Resistenz seit 1986 zunahm. Es wird ein Vergleich der Antibiotika-Resistenzraten der Anaerobier der verschiedenen Länder diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tally, F. P., Cuchural, G. J., Jacobus, N. V., Gorbach, S. L., Aldrigde, K., Cleary, T., Finegold, S. M., Hill, G., Iannini, P., O'Keefe, J. P., Pierson, C. Nationwide study of the susceptibility of theBacteroides fragilis group in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28 (1985) 675–677.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cuchural, G. J., Tally, F. P., Jacobus, N. V., Aldrigde, K., Cleary, T., Finegold, S. M., Hill, G., Iannini, P., O'Keefe, J. P., Pierson, C., Crook, D., Russo, T., Hecht, D. Susceptibility of theBacteroides fragilis group in the United States. Analysis by site of infection, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 717–722.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soussy, C. J., Thibault, M., Duval, J. Activité antibactériennein vitro du céfotaxime sur les bactéries anaérobies. La Nouvelle Presse Médicale 10 (1981) 556–558.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dublanchet, A., Durieux, R. Activité antibactérienne comparéein vitro de la céfalotine et de la céfoxitine sur les sous-espèces deBacteroides fragilis. Med. Mal. Inf. 9 (1979) 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tytgat, F. Activité de sept antibiotiques surBacteroides fragilis. Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur) 131 A (1980) 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubreuil, L., Devos, J., Neut, C., Romond, C. Etude de la sensibilité antibiotique des anaérobies stricts. Méd. Mal. Inf. 13 (1983) 478–483.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubreuil, L., Devos, J., Neut, C., Romond, C. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria from several French hospitals to three major antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 25 (1984) 764–766.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubreuil, L., Devos, J., Romond, C. Etude de la sensibilitéin vitro des bacilles Gram négatifs anaérobies stricts vis-à-vis de la N. F. Thiénamycine et de diverses céphalosporines. Pathol. biol. 32 (1984) 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubreuil, L., Derriennic, M., Reynaud, A., Devos, J., Romond, C., Courtieu, A. L. Sensibilité des anaérobies stricts au métronidazole à la céfoxitine et à la clindamycine. Pathol. Biol. 33 (1985) 899–903.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sedallian, A. Activité du céfotetan sur les bactéries anaérobies. Pathol. Biol. 34 (1986) 643–644.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Derriennic, M., Reynaud, A., Launay, C., Courtieu, A. L. Activitéin vitro de la pipéracilline, de l'amoxicilline, de la céfoxitine et du métronidazole face aux bactéries anaérobies strictes. La Nouvelle Presse Médicale 15 (1986) 2279–2281.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Derriennic, M., Reynaud, A., Launay, C., Courtieu, A. L. Activité comparée de neuf bêta lactamines de la clindamycine et du métronidazole sur les bactéries anaérobies strictes. Pathol. Biol. 35 (1987) 572–576.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Derriennic, M., Sedallian, A., Dubreuil, L.: Multicentric study on antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria. (unpublished data, in press)

  14. Garcia-Rodriguez, J. A., Garcia-Sanchez, J. E. Evolution ofBacteroides fragilis group antimicrobial susceptibility in Spain. Chemioterapia 4 (1985) (Suppl. 2) 806–809.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tally, F. P., Cuchural, G. J., Jacobus, N. V., Gorbach, S. L., Aldridge, K. E., Cleary, T. J., Finegold, S. M., Hill, G. B., Iannini, P. B., Mc Closkey, R. V., O'Keefe, J. P., Pierson, C. L. Susceptibility of theBacteroides fragilis group in the United States in 1981. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 23 (1983) 536–540.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avlami, A., Matsakas, E., Sahin, A., Giamarellou, H. The evolution of thein vitro activity of older and newer chemotherapeutics againstBacteroides fragilis group in Greece. Chemioterapia 4 (1985) (Suppl. 2) 808–809.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borobio, M. V., Pascual, A., Perea, E. J. Increasing resistance ofBacteroides fragilis group strains to metronidazole in Spain between 1977 and 1982. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 3 (1984) 153–155.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gallusser, A., Bille, J. Antibiotic resistance patterns inBacteroides clinical isolates. Chemioterapia 4 (1985) (Suppl. 2) 815–816.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heizmann, W., Heilmann, F., Werner, H. In vitro activity of ampicillin plus sulbactam against anaerobes compared to ampicillin and cefoxitin. Infection 15 (1987) 370–374.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fox, A. R., Phillips, I. The antibiotic sensitivity ofBacteroides fragilis group in the United Kingdom. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 20 (1987) 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bourgault, A. M., Harding, G. K., Smith, J. A., Horsman, G. B., Marrie, T. J., Lamothe, F. Survey of anaerobic susceptibility patterns in Canada. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 30 (1986) 798–801.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cuchural, G. J., Malamy, M. H., Tally, F. P. β-lactamase mediated Imipenem resistance inBacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 30 (1986) 645–648.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cuchural, G. J., Tally, F. P., Storey, J. R., Malamy, M. H. Transfer of β-lactamase associated cefoxitin resistance inBacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 29 (1986) 918–920.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Privitera, G., Ortisi, G., Rossi, R., Vigo, B., Setti, C. In vitro activity of a new penem FCE 22101 against anaerobic bacteria. Chemioterapia 4, 1985 (Suppl. 2) 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reig, M., Campello, M. G., Baquero, F. Epidemiology of clindamycin resistance in theBacteroides fragilis group. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 14 (1984) 595–603.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dublanchet, A., Durieux, R. Isolement deBacteroides fragilis résistant à la clindamycine. La Nouvelle Presse Médicale 6 (1977) 464.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dubreuil, L. In vitro comparison of roxithromycin and erythromycin against 900 anaerobic bacterial strains. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 20 (1987) (Suppl. B) 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Derriennic, M., Dubreuil, L., Reynaud, A. E., Courtieu, A. L. Comparativein vitro activities of four macrolides josamycin, erythromycin, spiramycin and roxithromycin against 424 anaerobic bacteria. Chemioterapia 6 (1987) (Suppl. 2) 159–160.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Olsson-Liljquist, B. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin againstBacteroides, Haemophilus influenzae andBranhamella catarrhalis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 3 (1984) 370–371.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dublanchet, A., Durieux, R. Sensibilité comparée de quelques bactéries aérobies et anaérobies à trois dérivés des 5 nitro-imidazoles, le métronidazole, l'ornidazole et la tinidazole. Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur) 131 (1980) 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sedallian, A. Sensibilité des anaérobies à huit antibiotiques. Pathol. Biol. 34 (1986) 645–647.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dublanchet, A., Caillon, J., Edmond, J. P., Chardon, H., Drugeon, H. B. Isolation ofBacteroides strains with reduced sensitivity to 5 nitroimidazoles. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 5 (1986) 346–347.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reynaud, A., Drugeon, H. B., Derriennic, M., Courtieu, A. L. Sensibilité comparée de 207 souches de bactéries anaérobies strictes à la pipéracilline et à quatre autres antibiotiques. Pathol. Biol. 33 (1985) 891–895.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubreuil, L., Romond, C., Derriennic, M. et al. Evolution in antibiotic susceptibility of bacteroides fragilis group strains in France based on periodic surveys. Infection 17, 197–200 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01644030

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01644030

Keywords

Navigation