Skip to main content
Log in

MICs of ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim for Escherichia coli: Influence of pH, inoculum size and various body fluids

Minimale Hemmkonzentrationen von Ciprofloxacin und Trimethoprim gegen Escherichia coli: Einfluß von pH, Inokulungröße und verschiedenen Körperflüssigkeiten

  • Therapy
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The influence of pH, inoculum size, human urine and prostatic extract on the MICs of ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim forEscherichia coli was investigated. There was no influence by the bacterial inoculum size within wide ranges on either drug. An increase in pH had a variable influence on the MICs of trimethoprim forE. coli but lowered those of ciprofloxacin considerably. Human prostatic extract increased the trimethoprim MIC forE. coli but lowered those of ciprofloxacin as compared to Mueller Hinton broth. Human urine increased the MICs of both drugs forE. coli.

Zusammenfassung

Der Einfluß von pH, Inokulumgröße, menschlichem Urin und Prostataextrakt auf die minimalen Hemmkonzentrationen von Ciprofloxacin und Trimethoprim gegenEscherichia coli wurde untersucht. Für keines der beiden Antibiotika ergab sich ein Einfluß der in einem großen Bereich geprüften Inokulumgrößen. Bei ansteigendem pH-Wert zeigten sich für Trimethoprim wechselnde Veränderungen der minimalen Hemmkonzentrationen gegenE. coli, die MHK-Werte für Ciprofloxacin wurden dagegen erheblich erniedrigt. Bei Prüfung in menschlichem Prostataextrakt waren die Trimethoprim-MHK-Werte gegenE. coli höher, die Werte für Ciprofloxacin dagegen niedriger als in Mueller-Hinton Bouillon. In menschlichem Urin zeigten sich für beide Antibiotika erhöhte MHK-Werte gegenE. coli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stamey, T. A., Meares, E. M., Winningham, D. G. Chronic bacterial prostatitis and the diffusion of drugs into prostatic fluid. J. Urol. 103 (1970) 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chin, N. X., Neu, H. C. In vitro activity of enoxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid, compared with those of norfloxacin, new beta-lactams, aminoglycosides and trimethoprim. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 24 (1983) 754–763.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fair, W. R., Cordonnier, J. J. The pH of prostatic fluid: a reappraisal and therapeutic implications. J. Urol. 120 (1978) 695–698.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Madsen, P. O., Whalen, P. R. Interaction between antimicrobial agents and prostatic tissue extract and fluid. Infection 6 (Suppl) (1978) S75-S77.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iravani, A., Welty, G. S., Newton, B. R., Richard, G. A. Effects of changes in pH, medium and inoculum size on thein vitro activity of amifloxacin against urinary isolates ofStaphylococcus saprophyticus andEscherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 27 (1985) 449–451.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aagaard, J., Madsen, P.O., Rhodes, P. et al. MICs of ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim for Escherichia coli: Influence of pH, inoculum size and various body fluids. Infection 19 (Suppl 3), S167–S169 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01643691

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01643691

Keywords

Navigation