Skip to main content
Log in

The throat badge as a status signal in juvenile male willow titsParus montanus

  • Published:
Journal für Ornithologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Status signalling in juvenile male Willow TitsParus montanus was studied by observing the outcome of interactions of birds with different size of their black throat badge, and by manipulating the size of their badge. The bird with the largest throat badge was the dominant one in all dyads studied (N=25), and the relative rank position of the males was positively correlated with the size of their badge. The badge size explained about 95% of the variation in the birds' dominance rank. When confronting juvenile males with a stuffed Willow Tit mounted close to a feeder placed in an aviary, there was found a negative correlation between the size of the badge of the males and the time from they were released till they visited the feeder. After subordinate birds from seven earlier dyads got their throat badge artificially increased, the originally dominant bird reacted submissively and tried to avoid the bird with a larger dyed badge, that temporary had increased its rank position. Our data support the status signalling hypothesis.

Zusammenfassung

Durch Beobachtung von Interaktionen zwischen jungen Männchen der Weidenmeise (Parus montanus) mit schwarzem Kehlfleck unterschiedlicher Größe und durch experimentelle Veränderung der Kehlfleckgröße wurde untersucht, ob durch den Kehlfleck der Dominanzstatus eines Vogels signalisiert wird. In allen untersuchten Paarvergleichen war der Vogel mit dem größten Kehlfleck dominant (N=25); die relative Rangposition eines Männchens war mit der Kehlfleckgröße positiv korreliert. Kehlfleckgröße erklärte 95% der Variation in der Rangstellung. Wurden junge Männchen mit einem Stopfpräparat konfrontiert, das in einem Käfig nahe der Futterstelle montiert war, ergab sich eine negative Korrelation zwischen der Kehlfleckgröße der Versuchsmännchen und dem Intervall zwischen ihrem Einsetzen in den Käfig und dem Besuch der Futterstelle. Nachdem die Kehlflecke von unterlegenen Männchen in sieben der Paarversuche künstlich vergößert worden waren, reagierte das vorher dominante Männchen unterwürfig und versuchte den Vogel mit dem durch Färbung vergrößerten Kehlfleck zu meiden, der dadurch vorübergehend seine Rangstellung verbesserte. Unsere Ergebnisse unterstützen die „status signalling“-Hypothese.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Dawkins, R., &J. R. Krebs (1978): Animal signals: information or manipulation? In:Krebs, J. R., &N. B. Davies, Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach: 282–309.

  • Dixon, K. L. (1963): Some aspects of social organization in the Caroline chickadee. Proc. XIII Int. Orn. Congr.: 240–258.

  • Eckert, C. G., &P.J. Weatherhead (1987): Owners, floaters and competitive asymmetries among territorial redwinged blackbirdsAgelaius phoeniceus. Anim. Behav. 35: 1317–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, J. (1988): Subordination costs and group territoriality in wintering Willow Tits. Acta XIX Int. Orn. Congr.: 2372–2381.

  • Ditto (1990): Alliances in winter flocks of willow tits; effects of rank on survival and reproductive success in male-female associations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto,G. Cederholm &C. Askenmo (1981): Spacing and survival in winter groups of willow titParus montanus and crested titP. cristatus — a removal study. J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugle, G. N., &S. I. Rothstein (1987): Experiments on the control of deceptive signals of status in white-crowned sparrows. Auk 104: 188–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A. (1990): Biological signals as handicaps. J. theor. Biol. 144: 517–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn, S. (1982): Variation in body measurements of the Willow TitParus montanus, together with a method for sexing live birds and data on the degree of shrinkage in size after skinning. Fauna norv. Ser. C, Cinclus 5: 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad, O. (1987): Social rank in winter flocks of Willow TitsParus montanus. Ibis 129: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1989 a): Winter floaters in Willow TitsParus montanus — a matter of choice or making the best of a bad situation? In:Blondel, J., et al., Population Biology of Passerine Birds, an Integrated Approach: 415–421.

  • Ditto (1989 b): The role of juvenile willow tits,Parus montanus, in the regulation of winter flock size: an experimental study. Anim. Behav. 38: 920–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holberton, R. L., K. P. Able &J. C. Wingfield (1989): Status signalling in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis): plumage manipulations and hormonal correlates of dominance. Anim. Behav. 37: 681–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. M., S. Rohwer &R. L. Winnergrad (1988): Social status signalling isabsent within age and sex classes of Harris' sparrows. Auk 424–427.

  • Järvi, T., &M. Bakken (1984): The function of the variation in the breast stripe of the great tit (Parus major). Anim. Behav. 32: 590–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson, E. D. (1979): Status signalling in dark-eyed juncos. Auk 96: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula, K., &M. Orell (1988): Social rank and winter survival in the willow titParus montanus. Orn. Fenn. 65: 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, M., &E. Lehikoinen (1976): Age determination of Willow and Crested TitParus montanus andP. cristatus. Orn. Fenn. 53: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., &G. A. Parker (1976): The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. Behav. 24: 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. (1987): Variation in badge size in male house sparrowsPasser domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim. Behav. 35: 1637–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, S. (1975): The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution 29: 593–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1977): Status signalling in Harris sparrows: some experiments in deception. Behaviour 61: 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto, &F. C. Rohwer (1978): Status signalling in Harris Sparrows: Experimental deception achieved. Anim. Behav. 26: 1012–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (1976): Ecological aspects of dominance hierarchies in black-capped chickadees. Auk 93: 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1984): Identification Guide to European Passerines. Stockholm.

  • Watt, D. J. (1986 a): A comparative study of status signalling in sparrows (genusZonotrichia. Anim. Behav. 34: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto (1986 b): Relationships of plumage variability, size and sex to social dominance in Harris' sparrows. Anim. Behav. 34: 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, D. P. (1986): Plumage variability and territoriality in breeding turnstoneArenaria interpres: status signalling or individual recognition? Anim. Behav. 34: 1471–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (1992): A re-assessment of the significance of status signalling in populations of wild great tits,Parus major. Anim. Behav. 43: 999–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogstad, O., Kroglund, R.T. The throat badge as a status signal in juvenile male willow titsParus montanus . J Ornithol 134, 413–423 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01639832

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01639832

Keywords

Navigation