Skip to main content
Log in

Sex drive, person perception, and marital choice

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the stimulus-value-role theory of marital choice, several hypotheses were derived relating to the relationship of person perception, sex drive, and marital choice. Subjects were two populations of premarital college couples who filled out questionnaires relating to sex drive and took two personality tests from different “perceptual sets.” It was predicted that couples in which the man had a high sex drive would show less perceptual compatibility, less accuracy in predicting the partner's responses, and less courtship progress than male-low-drive couples. No difference in perceived compatibility was predicted between highand low-drive women, but high-drive women were predicted to make better courtship progress. Last, discrepancies between members of a couple for sex drive were predicted to be associated with poor perceived compatibility and courtship progress. The hypotheses relating to male and female sex drive were generally supported, but those relating to couple discrepancy were only slightly supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgess, E. W., and Wallin, P. (1953).Engagement and Marriage Lippincott, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. (1959).Edwards Personal Preference Schedule Psychological Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrmann, W. (1960).Premarital Dating Behavior Bantam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaat, G. A., and Davis, K. E. (1971). Effect of volunteer biases on sexual behavior and attitudes.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male Saunders, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. (1970). Stimulus-value-role: A theory of marital choice.J. Marr. Fam. 32: 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. (1971). A theory of marital choice and its applicability to marriage adjustment and friendship. In Murstein, B. I. (ed.),Theories of Attraction and Love Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. (in press).Who Will Marry Whom? Studies in Marital Choice, Springer, New York.

  • Schmidt, G., and Sigusch, V. (1972). Sex differences in reactions to pictorial and narrative stimuli of sexual content. Paper read at the Fourth Meeting, Czecho-Slovakian Sex Research Association, Praha, June 8–9.

  • Shuttleworth, F. K. (1959). A biosocial and developmental theory of male and female sexuality.Marr. Fam. Liv. 21: 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V., Schmidt, G., Reinfeld, A., and Wiedemann-Sutor, I. (1970). Psychosexual stimulation: Sex differences.J. Sex Res. 6: 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, vol. 8 (1971).Erotica and Social Behavior, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

  • Terman, L. M. (1938).Psychological Factors in Marital Happiness McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murstein, B.I. Sex drive, person perception, and marital choice. Arch Sex Behav 3, 331–348 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01636439

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01636439

Keywords

Navigation