Summary
The angle between the total geomagnetic field direction and the axial dipole field direction was computed for the whole of the Earth's surface for the epoch 1945. It was supposed that the dipole field exerts a latitude-dependent influence on the surface manifestation of the non-dipole field. A modifying function of latitude was estimated to eliminate this influence. The isolines of the resulting quantity were plotted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. D. Skiles: A Method of Inferring the Direction of Drift of the Geomagnetic Field from Paleomagnetic Data. J. Geomagn. Geoelec., 22 (1970), 441.
S. K. Runcorn: On the Theory of the Geomagnetic Secular Variation. Ann. de Geophys., 15 (1959), 87.
R. Bock, W. Schumann: katalog der Jahresmittel der magnetischen Elemente der Observatorien und der Stationen, an denen eine Zeitlang erdmagnetische Beobachtungen stattfanden. B. I–IV. Akademie-Vlg, Berlin 1948.
M. P. Fisher: Annual Mean Values of Geomagnetic Elements since 1941. Natural Environment Res. Council, Inst. Geolog. Sci., Geomagn. Bull. No. 6, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1976.
Jahrbuch 1977 des Adolf-Schmidt-Observatoriums für Erdmagnetismus in Niemegk. Akad. d. Wiss. der DDR, Potsdam 1978.
E. H. Vestine et al.: The Geomagnetic Field, Its Description and Analysis. Carnegie Inst. of Washington Publ. 580, Washington, D. C. 1947.
R. R. Doell, A. Cox: The Pacific Geomagnetic Secular Variation Anomaly and the Question of Lateral Uniformity in the Lower Mantle. In: The Nature of the Solid Earth (Ed. E. C. Robertson), McGraw-Hill, Inc., USA 1972.
M. Barazangi, J. Dorman: World Seismicity Maps Compiled from ESSA, Coast and Geodetic Survey, Epicenter Data, 1961–1967. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 59 (1969), 369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Janáčková, A., Anděl, J. The deviation of the total geomagnetic field direction from the dipole field direction as a manifestation of the non-dipole field. Stud Geophys Geod 24, 153–162 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01634409
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01634409