Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasonic measurement: An evaluation of three heel bone scanners compared with a bench-top system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three commercial ultrasound bone scanners designed for os calcis measurements (Lunar Achilles, C.U.B.A. “Research” and UBA 575) were compared using the Leeds Ultrasonic Bone Phantoms. The porosity of the phantoms ranged from 50% to 83% with velocities between 1490 and 1621 m s−1 and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) values in the range 46–115 dB MHz−1. The three devices tested were able to discriminate porosity differences of at least 3%, although the values obtained for the propagation parameters varied widely. Velocity differences of up to 38 m s−1 and BUA variations of up to 33 dB MHz−1 were found, although a relationship was identified between the velocity and BUA measurements. In some cases, the variation can be attributed to differences in the measurement technique adopted, although there also seem to be detailed differences in the definition of the parameters themselves. The variation between different devices from the same manufacturer (Lunar) was also studied. Measurements taken from five devices showed variation in velocity values of up to 25 m s−1 (SD 10.8 m s−1) and in BUA values of up to 11 dB MHz−1 (SD 4.3 dB MHz−1). We conclude that the variation both between manufacturers and between nominally identical machines may be of clinical significance. Both users and manufacturers need to consider urgently the introduction of quality standards and consensus definition of terms and techniques. The fact that all machines studied have been superseded commercially does not invalidate these conclusions, since many of the devices tested remain in clinical use and there is no evidence of fundamental change in manufacturers' procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Massie A, Reid DM, Porter RW. Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:107–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Langton CM, Palmer SB, Porter RW. The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. Eng Med 1984;13:89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yamazaki K, Kushida K, Ohmura A, et al. Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in Japanese women. Osteoporosis Int 1994;4:220–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Truscott JG, Simpson M, Stewart SP, et al. Bone ultrasonic attenuation in women: reproducibility, normal variation and comparison with photon absorptiometry. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1992;13:29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hans D, Scott AM, Chapuy MC, et al. Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;55:94–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kawana K, Kushida K, Takahashi M, et al. The effect of menopause on biochemical markers and ultrasound densitometry in healthy females. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;55:420–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herd RJM, Blake GM, Ramalingham T, et al. Measurements of postmenopausal bone loss with a new contact ultrasound system. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;53:153–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herd RJM, Ramalingham T, Ryan PJ, et al. Measurements of the broadband ultrasonic attenuation in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:247–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bouxsein ML, Courtney AC, Hayes WC. Ultrasound and densitometry of the calcaneus correlate with the failure loads of cadaveric femurs. Calcif Tissue Int 1995;56:99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke AJ, Evans JA, Truscott JG, et al. A phantom for quantitative ultrasound of trabecular bone. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1677–87.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evans JA, Tavakoli MB. Ultrasonic attenuation and velocity in bone. Phys Med Biol 1990;35:1387–96.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenspan M, Tschigg CE. Table of the speed of sound in water. J Acoust Soc Am 1959;31:75–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strelitzki R, Clarke AJ, Evans JA. The measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in fixed trabecular bone using broadband pulses and single frequency tone bursts. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:743–53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bamber JC. Speed of sound. In: Hill CR, editors. Physical principles of medical ultrasound. New York: Wiley, 1986:206–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schott AM, Weill-Engerer S, Hans D, et al. Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:243–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rossman P, Zagzebski J, Mesina C, et al. Comparison of speed of sound and ultrasonic attenuation in the os calcis to bone density of radius, femur and lumbar spine. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1989;10:353–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kotzki PO, Buyck D, Hans D, et al. Influence of fat on ultrasound measurements of the os calcis. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;54:91–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lunar Achilles Manual. Madison, WI: Lunar Corporation.

  19. Lunar News, June 1994. Madison, WI: Lunar Corporation.

  20. Langton CM, Ali AV, Riggs CM, et al. A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. Clin PHys Physiol Meas 1990;11:243–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strelitzki R, Evans JA. On the broadband ultrasonic attenuation in trabecular bone. In: BMUS abstract book, 1995:48. (27th Meeting of the British Medical Ultrasound Society, 5–7 December 1995).

  22. Vahlensieck M, Glueer CC, Engelke K, et al. Osteoporosediagnostik mittels Breitband-Ultraschallabschwaechung (BUA): Korrelation zu etablierten Messverfahren der Knochendensito-metrie. Fortschr Rontgenstr 1993;158:479–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strelitzki, R., Clarke, A.J., Truscott, J.G. et al. Ultrasonic measurement: An evaluation of three heel bone scanners compared with a bench-top system. Osteoporosis Int 6, 471–479 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01629580

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01629580

Keywords

Navigation