Skip to main content
Log in

Semipractical alarms: A parable

  • Panel On Practical Alarms: Fifth International Symposium On Computing In Anesthesia And Intensive Care
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current alarms protect the manufacturers of medical equipment from liability but do little to improve the quality of patient care. Existing alarms are so intrusive that the response of the anesthesiologist and others in the operating room is to want the offensive noise to go away, rather than to address potentially life-threatening situations. Alarms need to be refined so that only those whose attention is required (e.g., the anesthesiologist) are disturbed. It should always be immediately clear which particular variable is outside accepted limits, and alarms for different variables should operate independently so that if one alarm fails, others will still work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Quinn M. The philosophy of alarms. In: Gravenstein JS, Newbower R, Ream AK, Smith NT, eds. The automated anesthesia record and alarm systems. Stoneham, MA: Butterworths, 1987:169–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quinn, M.L. Semipractical alarms: A parable. J Clin Monitor Comput 5, 196–200 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01627455

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01627455

Key words

Navigation