Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 164–167 | Cite as

Osteoporosis: The evolution of a scientific term

  • D. Schapira
  • C. Schapira
Review Article

Abstract

Coined in French in the early 1820s as a mere description of a pathological state of the bone, the term ‘osteoporosis’ made its way into the English medical vocabulary only in the twentieth century. Unlike other medical concepts, which have not been substantially altered by progress in medical research, the definition of osteoporosis has constantly reflected the state of knowledge on the phenomenon itself. Over its 170 years of evolution, this definition has continuously sought to maintain a difficult balance between physiological and clinical criteria. Even at present, while the 1990 Consensus Conference definition (centering mainly on physiological deterioration) merely implies the clinical aspect through the notions of fragility and fracture risk, others advocate restriction of the term to the clinical consequences of osteopenia. How will the concept of osteoporosis develop in the future? This article, which deals with the origin of the term and its successive definitions, is offered as a basis for further discussion on this subject of high topicality.

Keywords

Osteomalacia Osteoporosis Osteopenia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nordin BEC. The definition and diagnosis of osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1987;40:57–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mazess RB. Bone density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: thresholds and breakpoints. Calcif Tissue Int 1987;41:117–18.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riggs BL, Wahner HW. Bone densitometry and clinical decision-making in osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:293–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melton JL III, Wahner HW. Defining osteoporosis (editorial). Calcif Tissue Int 1989;45:263–4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melton JL III. A ‘Gomperzian’ view of osteoporosis (editorial). Calcif Tissue Int 1990;46:285–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt JE. Medical discoveries: who and when. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1959.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Universal-Lexicon der practische Medicin und Chirurgie. Leipzig: Heinrich Franze, 1941.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lobstein JGCFML (the Younger). Traité d'anatomie pathologique. Paris and Strasbourg 1829, 1833 (German translation: Stuttgart 1834).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raymond F. Dictionnaire général de la langue française et vocabulaire universel des sciences, des arts et des metiérs. 2 vols. Paris: A. André-Brochard-F. G. Levrault, 1832.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dulieu L. Joseph-Marie Dubreuil, médecin parisien, chirurgien de la Marine et professeur d'anatomie à Montpellier. Rev Hist Sci 1961;14(l):33–46.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Complément du dictionnaire de l'Académie Française. Paris: F Didot, 1842.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Larousse P. Grand dictionnaire universel du 19e siècle français, historique, géographique, mythologique, bibliographique, littéraire, artistique, scientifique, etc. 16 vols. Paris: Admin, du Gd. dict. univ. 1866–78.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Littré E. Dictionnaire de la langue française, vol 2. Paris and London: Hachette, 1868.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kraus LA. Kritisch-etymologisches medicinisches Lexicon. Göttingen: Verlag der Deuerlisch und Dieterichschen Buchhandlung, 1844.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quain R, A dictionary of medicine. New York: D Appleton and Co., 1888.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maxwell T. Terminologia medica polyglotta. London/Paris/Philadelphia: Churchill G Masson P. Blakiston, Son & Co., 1890.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton JL III. Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging. Relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 1981;67:328–33.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Einhorn TA. Osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease. Adv Orthop Surg 1984;8:175–84.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lindsay R. Managing osteoporosis: current trends, future possibilities. Geriatrics 1987;42:35–40.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Heilbrun LK, Vogel JM. Definition of a spine fracture threshold based upon prospective fracture risk. Bone 1987;8:271–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson BF, Lucasey BL, Robinson RG, Lukert BP. Contributing diagnoses in osteoporosis. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1069–72.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sewell KL. Modern therapeutic approaches to osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1984;15:583–614.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woolf AD, Dixon A StJ. Osteoporosis: an update on management. Drugs 1984;28:565–76.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osteoporosis. Lancet 1987;2:833–5.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lindsay R. Osteoporosis: an updated approach to prevention and management. Geriatrics 1989;44:45–54.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seeman E, Hopper JL, Bach LA, Cooper ME, Parkinson E, McKay J et al. Reduced bone mass in women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1989;320:554–8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mallette LE. Osteoporosis: approaching treatment with optimism. Postgrad Med Osteoporosis 1982;72:271–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gardsell P, Lindberg H, Obrant KJ. Osteoporosis and heredity. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989;240:164–7.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gold DT, Bales CW, Lyles KW, Drezner MK. Treatment of osteoporosis: the psychological impact of a medical education programme on older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:417–22.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    MacKinnon JL. Osteoporosis: a review. Phys Ther 1988;68:1533–9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Genant HK, Vogler JB, Block JE. Radiology of osteoporosis. In: Riggs BL, Melton JL III, editors. Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Raven Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dorland's medical dictionary, 27th edn. Philadelphia and London: WB Saunders, 1988.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Larousse médical illustré. Paris: Larousse, 1971.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Churchill's illustrated medical dictionary. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1989.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    De Sèze L, Rickewaert A. Maladies des os et des articulations. 2 vols. Paris: Flammarion Médicine-Sciences, 1954.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1991;96:107–10.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gillespy T III, Gillespy MP. Osteoporosis. Radiol Clin North Am 1991;29:77–84.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gallagher JC. The pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Bone Miner 1990;9:215–27.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Blakiston's gould medical dictionary, 3rd edn. New York; McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Parfitt AM. Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. Am J Med 1987;82:68–72.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Heaney RP. Osteoporosis at the end of the century (editorial). Western J Med 1991;154:106–7.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Politzer WZ, Anderson JJB. Ethnic and genetic differences in bone mass: a review with a hereditary vs environmental perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;50:1244–9.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fogelman J. An evaluation of the contribution of bone mass measurements to clinical practice. Semin Nucl Med 1989;19:62–8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kanis JA. Osteoporosis and osteopenia (editorial). J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5:209–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Foundation for Osteoporosis 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Schapira
    • 1
  • C. Schapira
    • 2
  1. 1.B. Shine Department of Rheumatology, Rambam Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, TechnionIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Humanities, TechnionIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations