Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Postmenopausal bone loss and the risk of osteoporosis

  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The two most important risk factors for long-term skeletal health are the peak bone mass and the subsequent rate of bone loss. The rate of bone loss after skeletal maturity is determined by both genetic factors and environmental factors. Furthermore, all factors that impair estrogen production will increase bone loss. The present risk of developing osteoporosis and fractures may be assessed by bone mass measurements in the total skeleton, or in local parts of the skeleton such as the spine, hip and forearm, by single-photon/X-ray absorptiometry (SPA or SXA), dual-photon/energy X-ray absorptiometry (DPA or DXA), or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Furthermore, the rate of bone loss in postmenopausal women may be assessed by means of a number of biochemical markers. The fútúre risk of developing osteoporosis may thus be determined by combining the values for bone mineral content and bone loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnston CC, Slemenda CW. Peak bone mass, bone loss and risk of fracture. Osteoporosis Int 1994;4 (Suppl 1):S43–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melton LJ, Chao EYS, Lane J. Biomechanical aspects of fractures. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ, editors. Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis, and management. New York: Raven Press, 1988:111–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen GF, Christiansen C, Transbøl I. Fracture frequency and bone preservation in postmenopausal women treated with oestrogen. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:493–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nachtigall LE, Nachtigall RH, Nachtigall RD, Beckman EM. Estrogen replacement therapy. I. A 10-year prospective study in the relationship to osteoporosis. Obstet Gynecol 1979;53:277–81.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lindsay R, Hart DM, Forrest C, Baird C. Prevention of spinal osteoporosis in oophorectomized women. Lancet 1980;2:1151–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr. Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 1988;81:1804–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Vogel JM. Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1988;3:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heaney RP, et al. En recherche de la difference (p<0.05). Bone Miner 1986;1:99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gotfredsen A, Pødenphant J, Nørgaard H, Nilas L, Nielsen V-AH, Christiansen C. Accuracy of lumbar spine bone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry. J Nucl Med 1988;29:248–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Consensus Development Conference. Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993;94:646–50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scientific Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 1989; 4 (Suppl 2).

  12. Hansen MA, Riis BJ, Overgaard K, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Bone mass measured by photon absorptiometry: comparison of forearm, heel, and spine. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1990;50:517–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazess R, Cameron JR. Direct readout of bone mineral content using radionuclide absorptiometry. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 1972;23:471–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nilas L, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Long-term precision of dual photon absorptiometry in the lumbar spine in clinical settings. Bone Miner 1988;3:305–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, et al. Dual photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone. Radiology 1985;156:203–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen MA, Hassager C, Overgaard K, Marslew U, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1156–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, et al. Abstract presented at RSNA'89, Chicago 26 November–1 December 1989.

  18. Christiansen C, Riis BJ, Rødbro P. Prediction of rapid bone loss in postmenopausal women. Lancet 1987;1:1105–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christiansen C, Riis BJ, Rødbro P. Screening procedure for women at risk of developing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1990;1:35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nilas L, Christiansen C. Bone mass and its relationship to age and the menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987;65:697–702.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Civitelli R, Gonnelli S, Zacchei F, et al. Bone turnover in postmenopausal osteoporosis: effect of calcitonin treatment. J Clin Invest 1988;82:1268–74.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Riis B J, Christiansen C. Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study. BMJ 1991;303:961–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Riis BJ. Consensus Development Conference 1993. Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Biochemical markers. II Clinical use. Am J Med (Submitted).

  24. Hassager C, Jensen SB, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C. The impact of measurement errors in diagnostic value of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int 1991:1:250–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Clinical and Basic Research, Ballerup Byvej 222, DK-2750, Ballerup, Denmark

    C. Christiansen

Authors
  1. C. Christiansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christiansen, C. Postmenopausal bone loss and the risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 4 (Suppl 1), S47–S51 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623436

Keywords

Search

Navigation