Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Premenopausal bone loss: Fact or artifact?

  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone strength is closely related to bone mass, and sex differences in bone mass are the main reason for the greater frequency of osteoporotic fractures in elderly women than in men of the same age. Peak bone mass is lower and the subsequent rate of loss is greater in women. It has been debated whether there is a significant bone loss in women before menopause. This has been studied in cross-sectional studies with and without information on menopausal status, and in longitudinal studies following women through the menopause. The present review addresses this issue and discusses important cross-sectional and longitudinal studies on this question. The overall conclusion is that there probably is a minor premenopausal trabecular bone loss which can be found to be of statistical significance where many individuals are included in the study and very precise methods are used, but it is of a magnitude which probably is of no clinical significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartley, MH, Arnold JS, Haslam RK, Jee WSS. The relationship of bone strength and bone quality in health, disease and aging. J Gerontol 1966;1:517.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horsman A, Currey JD. Estimation of mechanical properties of the distal radius from bone mineral content and cortical width. Clin Orthop 1983;176:298.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christiansen C, Rødbro P. Bone mineral content and estimated total body calcium in normal adults. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1975;35:433.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith DM, Khairi MRA, Norton J, Johnston CC. Age and activity effects on rate of bone mineral loss. J Clin Invest 1976;58:716.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conn SH, Vaswani A, Zanzi I, Ellis KJ. Effect of aging on bone mass in adult women. Am J Physiol 1976;230:143.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meinicke B, Jensen GF, McNair P, Hyldrstrup L, Transbol I. Perimenopausal bone changes. Calcif Tissue Int 1984;36 (Suppl 2):856.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rickelson LS, Whaner HW, Melton LJ, Riggs BL. Relative contributions of aging and estrogen deficiency to postmenopausal bone loss. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1273.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsay R, Hart DM, Aitken JM, MacDonald EB, Anderson JB, Clarke AC. Long-term prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis by estrogen. Lancet 1976;1:1038.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nachtigall LE, Nachtigall RH, Nachtigall RD, Beckman EM. Estrogen replacement therapy. I. A 10-year prospective study in the relationship to osteoporosis. Obstet Gynecoi 1979;53:277.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christiansen C, Christiansen M, McNair P, Hagen C, Stocklund K-E, Tranbol I. Prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss: controlled 2-year study in 315 normal females. Eur J Clin Invest 1980;10:273.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mazess RB. On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop 1982;165:239.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn WL, Mazess RG, et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. J Clin Invest 1982;70:716.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Awbrey BJ, Jacobsen PC, Grubb SA, McCartney WH, Vincent LM, Talmage RV. Bone density in women: a modified procedure for measurement of distal radial density. J Orthop Res 1984;2:314.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krolner B, Pors Nielsen S, Lund B, Lund Bj, Sørensen PH, Uhrenholdt A. Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine. II. Correlation between forearm BMC and lumbar spine BMC. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1980;40:665.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hedlund HR, Gallagher JC. The effect of age and menopause on bone mineral density of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 1989;4:639–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nilas L, Gotfredssen A, Hadberg A, Christiansen C. Age-related bone loss in women evaluated by single and dual photon absorptiometry. Bone Miner 1988;4:95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geusens P, Dequeker J, Verstraeten A, Nijs J. Age-, sex- and menopause related changes of vertebrae and peripheral bone: population study using dual and single photon absorptiometry and radiogrammetry. J Nucl Med 1986;27:1540–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slemenda C, Hui SL, Longscope C, Johnston CC. Sex steroids and bone mass. J Clin Invest 1987;8:1261–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nilas L, Christiansen C. Rates of bone loss in normal women: evidence of accelerated trabecular bone loss after the menopause. Eur J Clin Invest 1988;18:529–34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Falch JA, Sandvik L. Perimenopausal appendicular bone loss: a 10-year prospective study. Bone 1990;11:425–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Ribot C. The effect of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;52:340–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Clinical and Basic Research, Ballerup Byvej 222, DK-2750, Ballerup, Denmark

    B. J. Riis

Authors
  1. B. J. Riis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riis, B.J. Premenopausal bone loss: Fact or artifact?. Osteoporosis Int 4 (Suppl 1), S35–S37 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623433

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623433

Keywords

Search

Navigation