Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Different characteristics of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures

  • Session V: Bone And Biochemical Measurements
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pogrund H, Makin M, Robin G, Menczel J, Steinberg R. The epidemiology of femoral neck fractures in Jerusalem: a prospective study (1967–1971). Clin Orthop Rel Res 1977;122:141–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zetterber C, Anderson GBJ. Fractures of the proximal end of the femur in Göteborg, Sweden 1940–1970. Acta Orthop Scand 1982;53:419–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dretakis EK, Christodoulou NA. Significance of endogenic factors in the location of fractures of the proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:198–203.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bohr H, Schaadt O. Bone mineral content of femoral bone and the lumbar spine measured in women with fractures of the femoral neck by dual-photon absorptiometry. Clin Orthop 1983;179:240–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elabiden B, Olerud S, Karlstrom G, Smedby B. Rising incidence of hip fracture in Uppsala, 1965–1980. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:284–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erikkson SAV, Widhe TL. Bone mass in women with hip fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sernbo I, Johnell O. Changes in bone mass and fracture type in patients with hip fractures. Clin Orthop 1989;238:139–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vega E, Mautalen C, Gómez H, Garrido A, Melo L, Sahores AO. Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis Int 1991;1:81–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chevalley T, Rizzoli R, Nydegger V, Slosman D, Tkatch L, Ropin CH, et al. Preferential low bone mineral density of the femoral neck in patients with a recent fracture of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis Int 1991;1:147–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallagher JC, Melton LJ, Riggs BL, Bergstrath E. Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Rochester, Minnesota. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1980;150:163–71.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lips P, Taconis WK, Van Ginkel FC, Netelenbos JC. Radiologic morphometry in patients with femoral neck fractures and elderly control subjects: comparison with histomorphometric parameters. Clin Orthop 1984;183:64–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vega E, Mautalen C, Fromm G. Bone mineral density in patients with hip fractures of the proximal femur. In Christiansen C, Overgaard K, editors. Osteoporosis 1990. Copenhagen. Osteopress ApS, 1991:501–3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riggs BL, Wahner HZ, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging: differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clin Invest 1982;70:716–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uitewaal PJM, Lips P, Netelembos JC. An analysis of bone structure in patients with hip fracture. Bone Miner 1987;3:63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eventov I, Frisch B, Cohen Z, Hammel I. Osteopenia, hematopoiesis, and bone remodelling in iliac crest and femoral biopsies: a prospective study of 102 cases of femoral neck fractures. Bone 1991;12:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Melton LJ, III, Chao EYS, Lane J. Biomechanical aspects of fractures. In Riggs BL, Melton LJ, III, editors. Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis and management. New York, Raven Press, 1988:111–31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith RW Jr, Walter RR. Femoral expansion in aging women: implications for osteoporosis and fractures. Science 196;145:156–7.

  18. Einhorn TA. Biomechanical properties of bone. Triangle 1988;27:27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mautalen CA. Differences between cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Trends Osteoporosis 1991;3:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sección Osteopatías Medicas, Hospital de Clínicas ‘Jose de San Martín’, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    C. A. Mautalen & E. M. Vega

Authors
  1. C. A. Mautalen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. M. Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mautalen, C.A., Vega, E.M. Different characteristics of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures. Osteoporosis Int 3 (Suppl 1), 102–105 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01621878

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01621878

Keywords

Search

Navigation