Skip to main content
Log in

Auscultation cannot distinguish esophageal from tracheal passage of tube

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We quantitatively compared the acoustic characteristics of passage of an endotracheal tube into the trachea with those of passage into the esophagus by analyzing the loudness and frequency (90% spectral edge frequency) of the sounds when auscultated at the suprasternal notch. We found that there was a significant difference (P<0.01) in maximum loudness between esophageal and tracheal intubations (0.15±0.05 and 0.25±0.06 V, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the 90% spectral edge frequencies. We conclude that, without directly comparing the maximal acoustic amplitude of tracheal intubation with that of esophageal in each patient, one cannot distinguish between the two types of intubation by means of auscultation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Lone CD, McPeek B. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors. Anesthesiology 1978;49:399–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keenan RL, Boyan CP. Cardiac arrest due to anesthesia: a study of incidence and causes. JAMA 1985;253:2373–2377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson AW, Jacker LM. Death following inadvertent esophageal intubation: a case report. Anesth Analg 1973;52:398–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Howells TH, Riethmuller RJ. Signs of endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1980;41:689–691

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kerr JH. Is the tube in the trachea? (Letter) Br Med J 1987;295:400

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Linko K, Paloheimo M, Tammisto T. Capnography for detection of accidental oesophageal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983;27:199–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray IP, Modell JH. Early detection of endotracheal tube accidents by monitoring end tidal carbon dioxide concentration in respiratory gas. Anesthesiology 1983;59:344–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pollard BJ, Junius F. Accidental intubation of the esophagus. Anaesth Intensive Care 1980;8:183–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart RD, Paris PM, Winter PM, et al. Field endotracheal intubation by paramedical personnel: success rates and complications. Chest 1984;85:341–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Birmingham PK, Cheney FW, Ward RJ. Esophageal intubation: a review of detection techniques. Anesth Analg 1986;65:886–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mizutani, A.R., Ozaki, G., Benumof, J.L. et al. Auscultation cannot distinguish esophageal from tracheal passage of tube. J Clin Monitor Comput 7, 232–236 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01619265

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01619265

Key words

Navigation