Abstract
To assess the utility of routine duplex surveillance for prosthetic grafts in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass, 33 prosthetic grafts (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene; ePTFE 26, externally supported Dacron graft; EXS 7) were prospectively entered into a surveillance protocol from April 1990 through August 1994. Peak systolic flow velocity (PSFV), measured in two segments (midportion of the graft and host popliteal artery), was performed every 3 months. The mean value at the last point is compared between the patent group (n=28) and the occluded group (n=5). The means ± standard deviation (SD) of PSFV at the midportion of the graft are not significantly different in either group (patent group 36.4±7.0 cm/second, occlusive group 34.9±10.0 cm/second). For PSFV at the host popliteal artery, there is a tendency for the means ± SD of PSFV in the patent group to be superior to those in the occluded group (patent group 39.9±12.0 cm/second, occluded group, 29.6±7.4 cm/second). The mean rate of PSFV at the midgraft to PSFV at the popliteal artery (midgraft-popliteral artery index; MPI) in the occluded group is significantly lower than that of the patent group (patent group 1.2±0.3, occlusive group; 0.8±0.2,p<0.01), whereas all anklebrachial index (ABI) of the occluded group at the last point is higher than 0.85. Measurements of PSFV in two segments and calculation of MPI by using duplex scanning are more reliable in identifying failing prosthetic grafts than is determination of ABI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moore WS (1991) Therapeutic options for femoropopliteal occlusive disease. Circulation 83(suppl):I-91–3.
Sladen JG, Gilmour JL (1981) Vein graft stenosis. Characteristics and effect of treatment. Am J Surg 141:549–553.
Berkowitz HD, Greenstein S, Barker CF, et al. (1989) Late failure of reversed vein grafts. Ann Surg 210:782–786.
Bandyk DF, Cates RF, Towne JB (1985) A low flow velocity predicts failure of femoropopliteal and femorotibial bypass grafts. Surgery 98:799–809.
Hobson RW (1989) Recurrent symptoms and vein graft stenosis: the failing graft. In: Brewster DC, ed. Common problems in vascular surgery. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers: 289–93.
Barnes RW, Thompson BW, MacDonald CW, et al. (1989) Serial noninvasive studies do not herald postoperative failure of femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass grafts. Ann Surg 210:486–494.
Mills JL, Harris EJ, Taylor LM (1990) The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: A study of 379 reversed vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 12:379–389.
Bandyk DF (1986) Postoperative surveillance of femorodistal grafts: the application of echo-Doppler (duplex) ultrasonic scanning. In: Bergan JJ, Yao JST, eds. Reoperative arterial surgery. Orlando: Grune & Stratton: 59–79.
Grigg MJ, Nicolaides AN, Wolfe JHN (1988) Femorodistal vein bypass graft stenosis. Br J Surg 75:737–740.
Lalak NJ, Hanel KC, Hunt J, et al. (1994) Duplex scan surveillance of infrainguinal prosthetic bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 20:637–641.
Szilagyi DE, Elliott JP, Hageman JH, Smith RF, et al. (1973) Biologic fate of autogenous vein implants as arterial substitutes: clinical, angiographic, and histopathologic observations in femoropopliteal operations for atherosclerosis. Ann Surg 178:232–246.
Morinaga K, Eguchi H, Miyazaki T, Okadome K, et al. (1987) Development and regression of intimal thickening of arterially transplanted autologous vein grafts in dogs. J Vasc Surg 5:19–30.
Inokuchi K, Okadome K, Otsuka K, et al. (1984) A desktop computer to visalize the intraluminal velocity profile and its clinical application. J Vasc Surgl: 787–794.
Otsuka K, Takahara H, Okadome K, et al. (1990) Computational simulation method of intraluminal velocity profile proved by laser Doppler velocimeter. J Surg Res 49:408–412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Mawatari, K., Komori, K., Eguchi, D. et al. Usefulness of duplex scanning for following prosthetic grafts in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass: A new indicator for identification of failing grafts. International Journal of Angiology 7, 81–83 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618374
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618374