Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of duplex scanning for following prosthetic grafts in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass: A new indicator for identification of failing grafts

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Angiology

Abstract

To assess the utility of routine duplex surveillance for prosthetic grafts in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass, 33 prosthetic grafts (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene; ePTFE 26, externally supported Dacron graft; EXS 7) were prospectively entered into a surveillance protocol from April 1990 through August 1994. Peak systolic flow velocity (PSFV), measured in two segments (midportion of the graft and host popliteal artery), was performed every 3 months. The mean value at the last point is compared between the patent group (n=28) and the occluded group (n=5). The means ± standard deviation (SD) of PSFV at the midportion of the graft are not significantly different in either group (patent group 36.4±7.0 cm/second, occlusive group 34.9±10.0 cm/second). For PSFV at the host popliteal artery, there is a tendency for the means ± SD of PSFV in the patent group to be superior to those in the occluded group (patent group 39.9±12.0 cm/second, occluded group, 29.6±7.4 cm/second). The mean rate of PSFV at the midgraft to PSFV at the popliteal artery (midgraft-popliteral artery index; MPI) in the occluded group is significantly lower than that of the patent group (patent group 1.2±0.3, occlusive group; 0.8±0.2,p<0.01), whereas all anklebrachial index (ABI) of the occluded group at the last point is higher than 0.85. Measurements of PSFV in two segments and calculation of MPI by using duplex scanning are more reliable in identifying failing prosthetic grafts than is determination of ABI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moore WS (1991) Therapeutic options for femoropopliteal occlusive disease. Circulation 83(suppl):I-91–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sladen JG, Gilmour JL (1981) Vein graft stenosis. Characteristics and effect of treatment. Am J Surg 141:549–553.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berkowitz HD, Greenstein S, Barker CF, et al. (1989) Late failure of reversed vein grafts. Ann Surg 210:782–786.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bandyk DF, Cates RF, Towne JB (1985) A low flow velocity predicts failure of femoropopliteal and femorotibial bypass grafts. Surgery 98:799–809.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hobson RW (1989) Recurrent symptoms and vein graft stenosis: the failing graft. In: Brewster DC, ed. Common problems in vascular surgery. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers: 289–93.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barnes RW, Thompson BW, MacDonald CW, et al. (1989) Serial noninvasive studies do not herald postoperative failure of femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass grafts. Ann Surg 210:486–494.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mills JL, Harris EJ, Taylor LM (1990) The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: A study of 379 reversed vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 12:379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bandyk DF (1986) Postoperative surveillance of femorodistal grafts: the application of echo-Doppler (duplex) ultrasonic scanning. In: Bergan JJ, Yao JST, eds. Reoperative arterial surgery. Orlando: Grune & Stratton: 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grigg MJ, Nicolaides AN, Wolfe JHN (1988) Femorodistal vein bypass graft stenosis. Br J Surg 75:737–740.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lalak NJ, Hanel KC, Hunt J, et al. (1994) Duplex scan surveillance of infrainguinal prosthetic bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 20:637–641.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Szilagyi DE, Elliott JP, Hageman JH, Smith RF, et al. (1973) Biologic fate of autogenous vein implants as arterial substitutes: clinical, angiographic, and histopathologic observations in femoropopliteal operations for atherosclerosis. Ann Surg 178:232–246.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morinaga K, Eguchi H, Miyazaki T, Okadome K, et al. (1987) Development and regression of intimal thickening of arterially transplanted autologous vein grafts in dogs. J Vasc Surg 5:19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Inokuchi K, Okadome K, Otsuka K, et al. (1984) A desktop computer to visalize the intraluminal velocity profile and its clinical application. J Vasc Surgl: 787–794.

  14. Otsuka K, Takahara H, Okadome K, et al. (1990) Computational simulation method of intraluminal velocity profile proved by laser Doppler velocimeter. J Surg Res 49:408–412.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Mawatari, K., Komori, K., Eguchi, D. et al. Usefulness of duplex scanning for following prosthetic grafts in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass: A new indicator for identification of failing grafts. International Journal of Angiology 7, 81–83 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618374

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618374

Keywords

Navigation