Accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide tension analyzers
- 144 Downloads
Substantial mean differences between arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PetCO2) in anesthesia and intensive care settings have been demonstrated by a number of investigators. We have explored the technical causes of error in the measurement ofPetCO2 that could contribute to the observed differences. In a clinical setting, the measurement ofPetCO2 is accomplished with one of three types of instruments, infrared analyzers, mass spectrometers, and Raman spectrometers, whose specified accuracies are typically ±2, ±1.5, and ±0.5 mm Hg, respectively. We examined potential errors inPetCO2 measurement with respect to the analyzer, sampling system, environment, and instrument. Various analyzer error sources were measured, including stability, warm-up time, interference from nitrous oxide and oxygen, pressure, noise, and response time. Other error sources, including calibration, resistance in the sample catheter, pressure changes, water vapor, liquid water, and end-tidal detection algorithms, were considered and are discussed. On the basis of our measurements and analysis, we estimate the magnitude of the major potential errors for an uncompensated infrared analyzer as: inaccuracy, 2 mm Hg; resolution, 0.5 mm Hg; noise, 2 mm Hg; instability (12 hours), 3 mm Hg; miscalibration, 1 mm Hg; selectivity (70% nitrous oxide), 6.5 mm Hg; selectivity (100% oxygen), −2.5 mm Hg; atmospheric pressure change, <1 mm Hg; airway pressure at 30 cm H2O, 2 mm Hg; positive end-expiratory pressure or continuous positive airway pressure at 20 cm H2O, 1.5 mm Hg; sampling system resistance, <1 mm Hg; and water vapor, 2.5 mm Hg. In addition to these errors, other systematic mistakes such as an inaccurate end-tidal detection algorithm, poor calibration technique, or liquid water contamination can lead to gross inaccuracies. In a clinical setting, unless the user is confident that all of the technical error sources have been eliminated and the physiologic factors are known, depending onPetCO2 to determine PaCO2 is not advised.
Key wordsMonitoring carbon dioxide Equipment infrared analyzers Raman spectrometer mass spectrometer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.American Society of Anesthesiologists. Standards for basic intraoperative monitoring, House of Delegates of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, October 21, 1986. Park Ridge, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists, 1986Google Scholar
- 9.Gravenstein JS, Paulus DA, Hayes TJ.Capnography in clinical practice. Boston, Butterworths, 1988:103Google Scholar
- 10.Raemer DB, Philip JH. Monitoring anesthetic and respiratory gases. In: Blitt CD, ed.Monitoring in anesthesia and critical care medicine. New York, Churchill Livingston, 1989:373–386Google Scholar
- 11.Kertzman J. Continuous drying of process sample streams. Paper 73425, Instrument Society of America, Analytical Instrumentation Division, 1973:121–124Google Scholar
- 12.Anonymous. Evaluation: carbon dioxide monitors. ECRI Health Dev 1986;15:255–271Google Scholar
- 17.Brunner JX, Westenskow DR. How carbon dioxide analyzer rise time affects the accuracy of carbon dioxide measurements (abstr). J Clin Monit 1988;4:134Google Scholar
- 19.Weast RC, ed.CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 58th ed. Cleveland: CRC Press, 1978:F210Google Scholar
- 20.Hudson RD.Infrared system engineering. New York: Wiley, 1969Google Scholar