Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 285–290 | Cite as

Evaluation of users' abilities to recognize musical alarm tones

  • Frank E. BlockJr
Original Articles

Abstract

The problem of accurate identification of alarm sounds in the operating room, recovery room, and intensive care environment has persisted for many years. Monitors made by different companies may have different alarm sounds for the same monitored variable, and similar alarm sounds for different variables. In an effort to illustrate universal alarms sounds, a system of six musical alarm tones was designed with musical themes from popular songs used for oxygenation, ventilation, cardiovascular monitoring, temperature monitoring, artificial perfusion, and drug administration systems. These melodies were played for a group of anesthesiologists and others, who were initially asked to guess the organ system for each melody. The answers were then given to the participants, and after a short delay the melodies were played again in a different order. Seventy-nine response sheets were collected. The expected random score was 1.0±1.0 SEM correct. The observed score on the first hearing was 1.5±1.6 SEM,p=0.01 compared with the random score. The observed score on the second testing was 4.3±2.2 SEM,p=0.001 compared with the first hearing. Indeed, 42 of 79 (53%) respondents got all six answers correct on the second testing, versus three respondents for the first testing. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of integrated alarm systems used in complex medical environments such as the operating room.

Key words

Monitoring Equipment: monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Patterson R. Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft. Civil Aviation Authority Report 82017, 1982Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kerr JH. Warning devices. Br J Anaesth 1985;57:696–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spatz C, Johnston JO. Basic Statistics: tales of distributions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1976:247Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleiss, JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2d ed. New York: Wiley, 1981:126–129Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spatz C, Johnston JO. Basic statistics: tales of distributions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1976:273Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spatz C, Johnston JO. Basic statistics: tales of distributions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1976:269Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gulick WL, Gescheider GA, Frisina RD. Hearing: physiological acoustics, neural coding, and psychoacoustics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1989Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Backus J. The acoustical foundations of music. New York: W. W. Norton, 1969Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Merritt AT. Sixteenth-century polyphony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1939Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forte A. Tonal harmony in concept and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1962Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spaeth SG. Great symphonies; how to recognize and remember them. Garden City, NY: Garden City Publishing, 1936Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Little, Brown and Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank E. BlockJr
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of AnesthesiologyFrom The Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations