Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Successful individual approaches in engineering design

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designers have been observed and their abilities and design processes were analysed. Their solutions were evaluated in order to measure the success. Success-promoting abilities were: good spatial imagination, routine in sketching, solid engineering knowledge and high heuristic competence. An appropriate strategic approach was found to be oriented towards the central function when solving simple problems, whereas in more complex problems the approach also conformed with methodical guidelines. All in all, a flexible methodical style of working proved successful. During the goal analysis successful tactics were: asking questions focused on the problem structure, summarizing information, and not suppressing solution ideas. During the search for solutions successful tactics were: varying alternatives at least for the main functions, generating and reducing variants in a balanced manner, and evaluating solutions frequently and according to their level of abstraction. Based on these findings, conclusions have been drawn for engineering design research, education and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blessing, L. T. M., ‘A Process-Based Approach to Computer-Supported Engineering Design’. Cambridge: Black Bear Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dylla, N.,Denk- und Handlungsabläufe beim Konstruieren’. München: Hanser (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrlenspiel, K.; Dylla, N., ‘Experimental Investigation of the Design Process’,Proceedings ICED 1989, WDK 18. London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers (1989) pp. 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fricke, G., ‘Empirical investigation of successful approaches when dealing with differently precised design problems’,Proceedings ICED 1993, WDK 22. Zürich: Edition Heurista (1993) pp. 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fricke, G., ‘Konstruieren als flexibler Problemlöseprozeß—Empirische Untersuchung über erfolgreiche Strategien und methodische Vorgehensweisen’. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pahl, G.; Beitz, W.: ‘Konstruktionslehre’. Berlin: Springer (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Radcliffe, D. F.; Lee, T. Y., Design methods used by undergraduate engineering students,Design Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4 (1989) pp. 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stauffer, L. A.; Ullman, D. G., Fundamental processes of mechanical designers based on empirical data,Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 23, No. 2 (1991) pp. 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  9. VDI-Guideline 2221,Systematic Approach to the Design of Technical Systems and Products. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. VDI-Richtlinie 2225,Technisch-wirtschaftliches Konstruieren. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Von der Weth, R., Konstruieren—Heuristische Kompetenz, Erfahrung und individuelles Vorgehen,Zeitschrift für Arbeitsund Organisationspsychologie (1994) pp. 102–111.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Machine Elements and Engineering Design, Technical University Darmstadt, Germany

    Gerd Fricke

Authors
  1. Gerd Fricke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fricke, G. Successful individual approaches in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 8, 151–165 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608350

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608350

Keywords

Search

Navigation