Skip to main content
Log in

The Datum Flow Chain: A systematic approach to assembly design and modeling

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current CAD systems are ‘part-centric’ and do not capture the underlying logic of an assembly at an abstract level. We need to make CAD systems ‘assembly-centric’. To be able to lay out, analyze, outsource, assemble and debug complex assemblies, we need ways to capture their fundamental structure in a top-down design process, including the designer's strategy for constraining the parts kinematically and locating them accurately with respect to each other. We describe a concept called the ‘Datum Flow Chain’ to capture this logic. Most assembly problems occur due to ineffective datum logic or the choice of assembly procedures that are not consistent with the datum logic, if any, that was used to design the parts. The DFC relates the datum logic explicitly to the product's key characteristics, assembly sequences, and choice of mating features, and provides the information needed for tolerance analyses. Two types of assemblies are addressed: Type-1, where the assembly process puts parts together at their pre-fabricated mating features, and Type-2, where the assembly process can incorporate in-process adjustments to redistribute variation. Two types of assembly joints are defined: mates that pass dimensional constraint from part to part, and contacts that merely provide support. The scope of DFC in assembly planning is presented using several examples. Analysis tools to evaluate different DFCs and select the ones of interest are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee DJ, Thornton, AC. Key characteristics for agile product development and manufacturing. Agility Forum 4th Annual Conference Proceedings 1995

  2. Mantripragada R, Cunningham T, Whitney DE. Assembly oriented design: a new approach to designing assemblies. Product Modeling for Computer Integrated Design and Manufacture, TC5/WG5.2 International Workshop on Geometric Modeling in Computer-Aided Design, MJ Pratt, RD Sriram, Eds., 19–23 May 1995, Airlie, VA

  3. Lee K, Gossard D. A hierarchical data structure for representing assemblies: part 1. Computer-Aided Design 1985; 17: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sodhi R, Turner J. Towards a unified framework for assembly modeling in product design. RPI, Troy, NY, Technical report 92014, 1992

  5. Srikanth S, and Turner J. Toward a unified representation of mechanical assemblies. Engineering with Computers 1990; 6: 103–112

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roy U, Bannerjee P, Liu CR. Design of an automated assembly environment. Computer-Aided Design 1989; 21: 561–569

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gui J, Mäntylä M. Functional understanding of assembly modeling. Computer-Aided Design 1994; 26: 435–451

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio TLD, Whitney DE. Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences. IEEE J. Robotics and Automation 1987; 3: 640–658

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ko H, Lee K. Automatic assembling procedure generation from mating conditions. Computer-Aided Design 1987; 19: 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson R. Geometric Reasoning About Mechanical Assembly. Artificial Intelligence 1994; 71: 371–396

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hart-Smith DJ. Interface Control — The Secret to Making DFMA Succeed. Society of Automotive Engineers 1997

  12. Muske S. Application of Dimensional Management on 747 Fuselage. World Aviation Congress and Exposition Anaheim, CA, 1997

  13. Shah J, Zhang BC. Attributed graph model for geometric tolerancing. ASME Advances in Design Automation 1992; 44-2: 133–140

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham T, Mantripragada R, Lee D, Thornton A, Whitney D. Definition, analysis, and planning of a flexible assembly process. Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation Boston, MA, 1996

  15. Mello LSHD. Task sequence planning for robotic assembly. PhD dissertation, Electrical and Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, 1989

  16. Bourjault A. Contribution a une approche methodologique del'assemblage automatise. PhD dissertation, Universite de Franche-Comte, 1984

  17. Baldwin DF. Algorithmic methods and software tools for the generation of mechanical assembly sequences. SM Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, MIT, 1989

  18. Baldwin DF, Abell TE, Lui M-CM, Fazio TD, Whitney D. An integrated computer aid for generating and evaluating assembly sequences for mechanical products. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 1991; 7: 78–94

    Google Scholar 

  19. Whitney DE, Gilbert OL, Jastrzebski M. Representation of geometric variations using matrix transforms for statistical tolerance analysis in assemblies. Research in Engineering Design 1994; 6: 191–210

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mantripragada R, Whitney DE. Modeling and controlling variation propagation in mechanical assemblies using state transition models. Proceedings, 1998 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation

  21. Nevins JL, Whitney DE. Concurrent Design of Products and Processes McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adams JD. Feature-based Analysis of Selective Limited Motion in Assemblies. MS Thesis, MIT Mechanical Engineering Department, 1998

  23. Mantripragada R. Assembly Oriented Design: Concepts, Algorithms, and Computational Tools. PhD Thesis, MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering, 1998

  24. Wang N, and Ozsoy T. Automatic generation of tolerance chains from mating relations represented in assembly models. ASME Advances in Design Automation 1990; 23(1): 227–232

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shalon D, Gossard D, Ulrich K, and Fitzpatrick D. Representing geometric variations in complex structural assemblies on CAD systems. ASME Advances in Design Automation 1992; 44(2): 121–132

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang G, Porchet M. Some new developments in tolerance design in CAD. ASME Advances in Design Automation 1993; 65(2): 175–185

    Google Scholar 

  27. Frey DD, Otto KN. The process capability matrix: a tool for manufacturing variation analysis at the systems level (DETC97/DFM-4348) Proceedings of DFM: Design for Manufacturing Conference September 14–17 1997, Sacramento CA

  28. Munk C, Strand D. AFPAC — Accurate Fuselage Panel Assembly Cell. SAE paper 922411, Aerofast 92, October 13–15 1992, Bellevue, WA

  29. Kriegel JM. Exact Constraint Design. ASME Paper 94-WA/DE-18, 1994 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, November 1994

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mantripragada, R., Whitney, D.E. The Datum Flow Chain: A systematic approach to assembly design and modeling. Research in Engineering Design 10, 150–165 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01607157

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01607157

Keywords

Navigation