Sexual reproduction is a composite, not a singular, phenomenon and as such can be subdivided into a number of componentsi.e. fusion, recombination, fission, and the male-female phenomenon. These components can evolve independently, though any evolutionary change in one component is likely to influence the future evolution of the other components. The ambiguity that surrounds the term ‘sex’ due to a failure to recognise the composite nature of sexual reproduction has led to considerable confusion in past discussions of the evolution of the phenomenon. This paper considers the possible chronological interaction of the components of sexual reproduction both with each other and with the sequence of selective pressures that seem likely to have acted. This chronological approach is used to consider: the origin of sexual reproduction; the evolution of sexual reproduction in the common ancestor of the procaryotes and eucaryotes; the modification of the ancestral system in the procaryote line following the procaryote-eucaryote dichotomy; and the modification of the ancestral system in the eucaryote line up to the origin of the male-female phenomenon.
It is suggested that the fusion and recombination of the first living organisms were chronological continuations of the fusion and recombination of complex organic molecules that led up to the origin of life. The evolution of the third major component of sexual reproductioni.e. fission (replication), by definition coincided with the origin of life. Initial selection on the components of sexual reproduction are likely to have been related to the optimum manifestations of size, complexity, diversity, multiplication, and distribution. Resultant early evolutionary trends are likely to have been: selective fusion between more-similar organisms; increase in number of fissions per fusion; and less recombination.
The procaryote-eucaryote dichotomy is argued to have evolved in response to the increasing cellular problems of packing and replicating an increasing amount of hereditary material. The evolution of a single circular hereditary organelle in the procaryote line is argued to have led to the loss of total fusion and the specialisation of individuals into either donors or recipients. The donor-recipient phenomenon of procaryotes is directly analogous to the male-female phenomenon of eucaryotes and leads to parallel evolution due to sexual selection in both groups. In the eucaryote line the ancestral mechanism of sexual reproduction is argued to have persisted through, but to have been greatly modified by, the evolution of complex machinery (mitotic/meiotic) for the handling of multiple hereditary organelles at cell division and reduction division. The evolutionary modification of the ancestral system of sexual reproduction is suggested to have led in eucaryotes to the evolution of: the species phenomenon; allelic recombination; and the male-female phenomenon.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bernal, J. D. (1967). The origin of life.-Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.
Bodmer, W. F. (1970). The evolutionary significance of recombination in the Procaryota. Organisation and control in procaryotic and eucaryotic cells, 20th Symposium of the society for general microbiology.-Cambridge University Press.
Boyden, A. A. (1953), Comparative evolution with special reference to primitive mechanisms.-Evolution7, 21–30.
Calvin, M. (1969). Chemical evolution.-Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Campbell, A. (1964). Transduction.in:Gunsalus, I. C. &Stanier, R. Y. (eds), Bacteria, Vol. V, Heredity, 49–86.-Academic Press, New York & London.
Clark, R. B. (1964). Dynamics in metazoan evolution.-Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Cohen, J. (1969). Why so many sperms? An essay on the arithmetic of reproduction.-Sci. Prog., Oxford,57, 23–41.
Crow, J. F. &Kimura, M. (1969). Evolution in sexual and asexual populations: a reply.-Amer. Natur.,103, 89–91.
DeLong, R. (1967). On sexuality in bacteria.-J. theor. Biol.16, 333–6.
Dougherty, E. C. (1955). The origin of sexuality.-Syst. Zool.4, 145–69.
Driskell-Zamenhof, P. (1964). Bacterial episomes.In:Gunsalus, I. C. &Stanier, R. Y. (eds), Bacteria, Vol. V, Heredity, 155–222.-Academic Press, New York & London.
Erlich, P. R. &Holm, R. W. (1963). The process of evolution.-McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fischer-Fantuzzi, L. &DiGirolamo, M. (1961). Triparental mating inEschenchia coli.-Genetics,46, 1305–15.
Fisher, R. A. (1930), The genetical theory of natural selection.-Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fong, P. (1967). Packing of the DNA molecule.-J. theor. Biol.15, 230–5.
Fuller, H. J. &Tippo, O. (1949). College botany.-Henry Holt & Co., New York.
Gross, J. D. (1964). Conjugation in bacteria.In:Gunsalus, I. C. &Stanier, R. Y. (eds), Bacteria. Vol. V, Heredity. 1–48.-Academic Press, New York & London.
Hamilton, W. D. (1967). Extraordinary sex ratios.-Science,156, 477–88.
Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik.- Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.
Hinton, H. E. (1948). A synopsis of the genusTribolium Macleay, with some remarks on the evolution of its species-groups (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae).-Bull. Entomol. Research39, 13–55.
— (1968). Reversible suspension of metabolism and the origin of life.-Proc. Roy. Soc. (B)171, 43–56.
- (1971). Reversible suspension of metabolism.-De la physique théorique à la biologie,C.N.R.S. 69–89.
— &Blum, M. S. (1965). Suspended animation and the origin of life.-New Scientist.28, 270–1.
Hutner, S. H. &Provasoli, L. (1951). The phytoflagellates.In: Biochemistry and physiology of Protozoa, Vol. 1.-Academic Press, New York & London.
Leedale, G. F. (1968). The nucleus inEuglena.In:Buteow, D. E. (ed.) The biology ofEuglena. Vol. I General biology and ultrastructure. 185–243.- Academic Press, New & York London.
Luria, S. (1953). General virology.-John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Margulis, L. (1970). The origin of eucaryotic cells.-Yale University Press, Newhaven & London.
Maynard-Smith, J. (1971). What use is sex?-J. theor. Biol.30, 319–35.
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution.-Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Oparin, A. I. (1961). Life: its nature, origin, and development.-Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh & London.
Parker, G. A. (1970a). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects.-Biol, Rev.45, 525–68.
— (1970b). Sperm competition and its evolutionary effect on copula duration in the fly,Scatophaga stercoraria.-J. Insect Physiol.16, 1301–1328.
—,Baker, R. R., &Smith, V. G. F. (1972). The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon.-J. theor. Biol.36, 529–53.
Pringsheim, E. G. (1949). The relationship between bacteria and Myxophyceae.- Bact. Revs.13, 47–98.
Savage, J. M. (1969). Evolution (2nd ed.)-Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London.
Schaeffer, P. (1964). Transformation.In:Gunsalus, I. C. &Stanier, R. Y. (eds), Bacteria, Vol. V, Heredity, 87–154.-Academic Press, New York & London.
Sermonti, G. &Hopwood, D. A. (1964). Genetic recombination inStreptomyces.In:Gunsalus, I. C. &Stanier, R. Y. (eds), Bacteria, Vol. V, Heredity, 223–52.-Academic Press, New York & London.
Smith, G. M. (1955). Cryptogamic botany, Vol. I, Algae and fungi.-McGraw-Hill, New York.
Stanier, R. Y. (1964). Toward a definition of the bacteria.In:Gunsalus, I. C. &Stanier, R. Y. (eds), Bacteria, Vol. V, Heredity, 445–64.-Academic Press, New York & London.
Stebbins, G. L. (1960). The comparative evolution of genetic systems.In:Tax, S. (ed.) Evolution after Darwin, Vol. I, The evolution of life, 197–226.-University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Swanson, C. P., Merz, T. & Young, W. J. (1967). Cytogenetics.-Prentice-Hall International, London.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection.In:Campbell, B. (ed.) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971.-Aldine, Chicago.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection.-Princeton University Press, Princeton.
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, R.R., Parker, G.A. The origin and evolution of sexual reproduction up to the evolution of the male-female phenomenon. Acta Biotheor 22, 49–77 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01601983
- Sexual Selection
- Sexual Reproduction
- Composite Nature
- Considerable Confusion
- Reduction Division