Conclusions
-
1.
It is possible to discern the most active research topics (in CMP) by selecting the scientific reviews having high SW-values.
-
2.
On the basis of SW-values of scientific reviews one may estimate the degree of involvement of the research groups to which their authors belong in the development of scientific topics of their own.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vlachý L: Czech. J. Phys.B 33 (1983) 117–120.
Vlachý J.: Czech. J. Phys.B 35 (1985) 801–804.
Garfield E.: Citation Indexing. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979, p. 98–148.
Garfield E.: in Index of Scientific Reviews, ISI, Philadelphia, 1984, p. 1.
Vlachý J.: Czech. J. Phys.B 34 (1984) 95–98.
Vlachý J.: Czech. J. Phys.B 34 (1984) 171–174.
Kara-Murza S. G., Rozhkov S. A.: Vestnik AN SSSR (1984) No. 8, 44–57.
Index of Scientific Reviews. ISI, Philadelphia, 1984, p. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We are grateful to Dr. S. G. Kara-Murza and Dr. V. K. Popov for useful discussions, as well as to Dr. J. Vlachý (Prague) for a number of valuable remarks.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rozhkov, S.A., Yavelov, B.E. & Melamed, S.A. Forefront research and group involvement in condensed matter physics assessed from scientific reviews. Czech J Phys 36, 118–120 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01599742
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01599742